I only compared what bullet I was given which was the 105. I the went to the 88 rather than a 95 smk. Thought I kinda did a fair comparison. It's really a senseless thread to Carry on the difference between the two. My comment doesn't defend the 224 as the better performing round. It only defends it as a closer comparison than it's been given by another. Of course the 6 Creedmoor is ballistically superior. It ought to be. Its not night and day by using the 105 vs 88. Many have chosen the high BC .224 bullets over farily high bc 6mm bullets due to the recoil and shootability of the 22. Not alot different than comparing the 300 NM to the 338 Lapua Mag. Just a much larger comparison. Fun,varmints, plinking etc. If it was for serious shooting or competition, it really wouldn't be a tough decision.If you want to pick high bc 22's like the 88ELD then compare apples to apples and compare the the high bc 6mm's like the 110SMK and the 115 DTAC. A 6 Creed can push 110SMK's and 115DTAC's at 3100. Both have right at .620 BC. At a thousand yards the 6mm has 2moa less drop and a little over 1 moa (about 12") less wind drift in a 10 mph cross wind.
If you compare more common bullets like the 105-108 6mm's to the 80gr range 22's the difference grows considerably larger in favor of the 6mm.
I shoot mostly 600 and 1K F Class. What's "close" or not is subjective but a 12" wind advantage in my shooting disciplines would be considered not even close. And this best a case scenario, again, when you compare 105-107 6mm's to the 80gr range 22's the difference grows even more in favor of the 6mm's.
If your only shooting to 500 yards you could call it close enough, but the OP's criteria was out to 1K. And don't get me wrong, I like the 22-250 especially the AI version, but when when you throw in that 1K distance there's a good reason why we go up to 6mm's and larger. Because it ain't even close..
Last edited: