• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

6XC OR 6 Creedmoor

Did they elaborate on some of the "whys" of that decision?

Thanks,

George
Some of this experience, I've been around my share of 6 creeds, owned one, and some conjecture, but I think necking the case down results in a lack of efficiency. If you run the faster powders that work in 6.5, now you have no barrel life. If you opt for a slower powder, now you get into a dead zone of suitable powders, and incomplete burns the order of the day. And it does not have the capacity to run slow powders like H1000.
I have friends that are trying to download the case for prs style shooting, (fast strings), it's not really working, too much carbon buildup, esp carbon rings.
Not a fair comparison, but take the 6.5x284, far from an efficient case itself, necked down to 6mm, yeah it worked, all it is was something to talk about.
I Pulled my 6 creed apart, I'm done with the case, but I pulled my barrel because my sizing die out of spec, was not buying new die, fixing brass, or buying new brass, it was just the easiest route
 
Last edited:
Did they elaborate on some of the "whys" of that decision?

Thanks,

George
The ones that had 6xc's before 6 Creedmor said the XC was easier to load for, had better barrel life, and easier to keep in tune. The one that had 6.5 and went to 6 Creedmor said that he just bought into the hype and had already ordered another 6.5 barrel. WD
 
Lapua making 6mm creedmoor brass by the end of the year. This is a no brainer IMO. Not to mention you're starting to see 6mm creedmoor factory ammo on the market and even factory rifles chambered in this caliber. You'll never see that with the 6XC.
 
Lapua making 6mm creedmoor brass by the end of the year. This is a no brainer IMO. Not to mention you're starting to see 6mm creedmoor factory ammo on the market and even factory rifles chambered in this caliber. You'll never see that with the 6XC.

I learned quite some time ago...the hard way...."never say never."
 
Some of this experience, I've been around my share of 6 creeds, owned one, and some conjecture, but I think necking the case down results in a lack of efficiency. If you run the faster powders that work in 6.5, now you have no barrel life. If you opt for a slower powder, now you get into a dead zone of suitable powders, and incomplete burns the order of the day. And it does not have the capacity to run slow powders like H1000.
I have friends that are trying to download the case for prs style shooting, (fast strings), it's not really working, too much carbon buildup, esp carbon rings.
Not a fair comparison, but take the 6.5x284, far from an efficient case itself, necked down to 6mm, yeah it worked, all it is was something to talk about.
I Pulled my 6 creed apart, I'm done with the case, but I pulled my barrel because my sizing die out of spec, was not buying new die, fixing brass, or buying new brass, it was just the easiest route

Both of my 6mm creeds have been super easy to load for. 1st one is still going strong with 1800rds on it and the second is at 500 with zero issue's. Both shoot practically the same load (4451 or rl23) with the exception of bullet choice as one has used only 105 and the other 115. I have no experience with xc but can't really see it being any easier.
 
blaser already have released 6xc

Blaser rifles use a modular system with owner-operation QD barrel (and if needed, magazine) changes, so 'releasing a rifle in any particular calibre' simply means that the company has produced a stock of barrels in that calibre / chambered for that cartridge. The number of barrels made in a batch might be in the 10s, 100s, or ,000s depending on expected demand. The cost and risk of investing in a low demand cartridge are modest - the hammer forging mandrel, barrel forging machine downtime for set-up/breakdown before and after a run, and the inventory cost of the barrels alone should they sit on a shelf for years only being slowly used up. That's how come Blaser R models are also one of the tiny handful (possibly the only) factory rifles also listed in 6.5X47mm Lapua.

When an order is received for a new complete rifle, the factory staff simply select the appropriate bits from the store, assemble them, check headspace, and send the completed item off to the proof-house. (An EU legal requirement.) As many owners use the DIY switch calibre facility, the order may be for a standalone barrel as an alternative. The assembly bit takes a few minutes only. Manufacturing a conventional rifle with a threaded barrel takes more time and work and once made it ties up the inventory cost of the complete rifle (or maybe just a barrelled action) until an order is received.

So, having Blaser list a cartridge doesn't necessarily signal any opening of floodgates with others following. Because Blaser can do this so easily and relatively cheaply though, how quickly it starts to list something is a good indicator of demand being received from dealers and its distributors in other countries. I believe it has taken several years for 6XC to be adopted whereas the Creedmoors were picked up rather more quickly.
 
Both of my 6mm creeds have been super easy to load for. 1st one is still going strong with 1800rds on it and the second is at 500 with zero issue's. Both shoot practically the same load (4451 or rl23) with the exception of bullet choice as one has used only 105 and the other 115. I have no experience with xc but can't really see it being any easier.
Not really what I was trying to convey at all, I know it can work. I guess I should have went in depth by saying if you run a powder in the 4451 burn rate, you now have a less than ideal case fill, and 4-5 gr of unusable capacity. If you are not utilizing the capacity of the case, it's efficiency drops, IMO
 
A 243 will shoot 105s all the way up to almost 3400 with N160, and you can shoot the lower nodes to the same or even better accuracy. I am really kind of stunned no one shoots it. Works for Dan Whidden, and considering how people love to copy so and so whoever won this or that, people not copying Whidden is really kind of perplexing. Maybe it the cost of VV 160N powder... No one uses it. It is one of the neatest powders i have ever tried in my life. It runs cooler than H1000, is so clean it barely leave anything in the bore and is just stupid accurate from the bottom node to the top.
A couple in our club shoot the 243 competitively and win matches. I shoot it and have shot a 1.7 inch group at 540 yds using Hornady 105 hpbt. That's in a Savage PTA and criterion barrel.
 
That's funny, there is no one that I know that started out with a 6.5 creedmoor and transitioned to the 6mm version that would ever go back. Shoot a 140 hybrid at say 2870 fps, or the same BC bullet in 6mm at 3100fps. No brainer.
With less recoil.
Which 6mm bullet has the same bc as a 140 hybrid? Berger shows .311 for the 140 Hybrid. The 115 VLD is only .289 and pushing that to 3100 is going to be a bit warm.
 
Which 6mm bullet has the same bc as a 140 hybrid? Berger shows .311 for the 140 Hybrid. The 115 VLD is only .289 and pushing that to 3100 is going to be a bit warm.
Hohn, You probably will not get a reply from him. Thread is a couple years old and if I remember correctly he got banned from this site.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,851
Messages
2,204,884
Members
79,174
Latest member
kit10n
Back
Top