Sounds like you should've held a few bucks back for an anger management class.
Another comment from the Wyoming peanut gallery.Sounds like you should've held a few bucks back for an anger management class.
Last edited:
Sounds like you should've held a few bucks back for an anger management class.
Another comment from the Wyoming peanut gallery.Sounds like you should've held a few bucks back for an anger management class.
Take the number of years that Jewell's have been around. When B&A triggers equal the same time span, then see who has more records under it belt. I would bet my life that the B&A's exceed the number of records that Jewell's have ever held.Jewell triggers have been on more winning and record setting rifles than all others combined.
This^^^^stay on topic...
Geeeze, can't there be an intelligent discussion with dissenting views without getting childish and nasty??
They are hard to compare on a cost basis. Wages in Austria are considerably higher than here in the U.S. Add to that the import/export fees, shipping and dealer markup. Those things add to the cost of the trigger.Why not compare one of the new BIX n ANDY triggers that Run In the $175-200 range to a Jewel in the same price range and see honestly which one is most consistent? The KIA will cost less than the Rolls and the Rolls will by far be the most luxurious but they both will get you to the same place albeit at very different costs. So lets compare apples to apples on a cost basis. I think both are great and can't wait to try the new Budget priced BIX. If their customer service is close to Jewel's then it is top notch!
I don't exactly agree with this statement. People use what works. If you look at short range BR. 20 years or so ago the barrel lists would have been mostly Hart's and Shilens. I believe Krieger and Bartlien are now the top choices. Seems most want cut barrels over button. When quality goes down people stop or slow down buying. Shooters talk among themselves at matches.It's an equipment race, with no end in sight.
That logic just does not make sense. IIRC the Mac McMillan rifle was made up of components that neither were/are popular, widely used, or copied by custom action makers. As a matter of fact in that time period, XP-100 actions were among the winningest in the BR circuit. I believe the action and barrel were McMillan and the scope was Remington 20x. How does that analogy work?All of the quality equipment works, Matt. If 75% of the actions used are BAT, a BAT action has a greater chance of being on the winning gun. Same thing for barrels, bullets and scopes. Popularity, percentage used and copycat rule the roost. Look at the rifle and scope used that set and held the SR small group record for more than 4 decades![]()
The action was made by McMillan, and other competitors purchased their actions. The button rifled barrel was made by McMillan, highly regarded, and they were on many match winning rifles. The Scope was a 12x Leupold boosted by Wally Siebert to 24x. It was chambered in 222 Remington using hand swaged 50 grain bullets, BL-C powder and CCI BR4 primers. Tony Boyer accumulated many HOF points using button rifled barrels, along with the lowly Leupold scopes and Jewell triggers. A great shooter can win with any of the quality actions, barrels, scopes, etc; etc. The 222 Remington was "popular" and "widely used". It isn't so much what you use, but rather how you use it along with the enormous amount of time behind the trigger to enjoy success. With the quality we have available, any properly machined and assembled rifle is capable of winning in the hands of a top tier shooter. If current competitors were shooting the 22PPC short, Waldog or 220 BEGGS, rather than the 6PPC, those 22's would be winning.That logic just does not make sense. IIRC the Mac McMillan rifle was made up of components that neither were/are popular, widely used, or copied by custom action makers. As a matter of fact in that time period, XP-100 actions were among the winningest in the BR circuit. I believe the action and barrel were McMillan and the scope was Remington 20x. How does that analogy work?
BTW, a small group won't get you in the HOF like winning aggregates will.