Why do we mock that which we don't understand?Hope you are kidding because it would have no use except to impress others with the WOW factor. Even if your family makes rifle barrels, it is a non-starter.
Why do we mock that which we don't understand?Hope you are kidding because it would have no use except to impress others with the WOW factor. Even if your family makes rifle barrels, it is a non-starter.
There are two "Cheetahs".
The Mark I flavor is a near twin to the .22-243AI, sharing the 40 ° shoulder. The Cheetah Mark II has a 28 ° shoulder. Main difference is that the Cheetahs are built off necking down (small primer pocket) .308Palma brass. Whereas, the .22-243Win & AI are a simple step down of .243Win brass.
I had a .22-243Win for a few years, it opened my eyes to the capability of what a fast twist .224 hotrod can do. I could plaster my 1K steel target relative ease, courtesy of Alliant powders & 75 Amaxs.
Fast forward a couple years, compared my .22-243Win case side by side to a .22-243AI. That got the wheels turning on how to make a very good thing, better!
Side by side:
![]()
Cool thing about the .22-243Win is, there is brass, everywhere for it. Heck, I just picked up 50pcs. of Hornady at the local range, for free. Or, you can load with Lapua & roll in style.
For reloading, if you have .243Win dies already, you're either halfway home...or already there! A .243Win bushing die with proper bushing is all ya need for sizing. And, a .243Win seater will work fine for heavy .224 bullets.
Same rules apply for .22-243AI dies, all ya need is a 243AI bushing die. The 243AI seater works fine.
Middlested is a cool round, almost like a .22SLR. But, if I'm fireforming, I'll go 'full monty' and blow it all the way out to AI & enjoy the extra capacity. Beyond that, the Middlested is gonna need a custom die if you wish to FL size at all. Might get away with a .243AI sizer? For that, the net gain in performance is negligible over a .22-243Win. I have 'one off' wildcats & custom dies, but only because there wasn't an easy alternative. Simple fact is, a .22-243Win is just that...easy!
For easy peasy, throttle up a .22-243Win with RL-22 or 17. By the time you need to trim brass, it'll be toast. And ya won't fret losing one, here & there...
Or, fireform that .22-243Win to an AI. More capacity = ability to run a full case of slow burn powder like H1000 or Retumbo. Might just eek ya out a couple hundred more rounds on the back end, and you'll still hit that 35-3700fps 'sweet spot' where a 75-80gr bullet seems to perform optimally, without over-stressing the bullet...
Performance wise, whatever a .22Creed can do, a .22-243Win has already been doing for a long time. .22Creed is just the new kid on the block to reach the same end. If Lapua 6.5Creed (smal pocket) brass comes out, you'll need two steps to get to .224. Whereas, Lapua .243 brass is one step. Up to you, if you think the percieved benefit of (small pocket) Creed is worth the extra step?
.22x47L is a little badazz, but you'll need to pressure those cases to the roof to match a .22-243AI. And likely, that will negatively impact barrel life that is already short on a .224 hotrod. Up to you, if you consider that a good idea?
Wild card (for me) with the .22-243AI is using RL-26. I still haven't been able to find any! Bet that would make a .22-243AI even more of a short action monster than it already is...
Obviously, we've all got our favorites! If you've got components for any of 'em, that makes decisions easier. Regardless of what ya go with, you'll have ALOT of fun!!!
I'll sure find out for sure on round count. However the barrel is going back for nitride. We will have to see how it goes.
Let's face it. The average guy using it to shoot coyotes or ghogs won't shoot that much in 2 years even if they throw in some steel plates and other playing. Even every two years spending 500.00 on a new barrel is chicken feed. Put it in perspective because for the fun thats brought into our lives shooting these barrel burners is unequalled in my opinion.i'll probably get flamed for this but here goes. Im tired of always hearing the barrel burner argument. Some people don't care. I can go to my shop and set my barrel back or just replace it if i want. I know people who can go through 10 barrels a year and never blink. I know a guy that shoots a 22/243 on a dog town. Takes several guns with him at a time, then rebarrels them for the next trip. I know a guy that drives a ferrari as a daily driver, wouldn't work for me, Ill stick with my truck. Just because it not practical for someone doesn't mean its not normal for another. Some people like the biggest, fastest, hotrod they can get. Barrels are just part of the cost, nothing more.
Don,t get me wrong. I did not say don,t build on. Just pointing out when your grand kids get it , they will not hit the ground. But thanks for the heads up on the 223 and 308. I did not know they were for target shooting WOW.. Thanks tommy Mc..600 to 700 rounds is a lot of coyotes, woodchucks, Pdogs, crows, ect.
Now if you use it to punch paper or plinking, well that is not the right option,
that's what 223 and 308s are for.
Dean
i'll probably get flamed for this but here goes. Im tired of always hearing the barrel burner argument. Some people don't care. I can go to my shop and set my barrel back or just replace it if i want. I know people who can go through 10 barrels a year and never blink. I know a guy that shoots a 22/243 on a dog town. Takes several guns with him at a time, then rebarrels them for the next trip. I know a guy that drives a ferrari as a daily driver, wouldn't work for me, Ill stick with my truck. Just because it not practical for someone doesn't mean its not normal for another. Some people like the biggest, fastest, hotrod they can get. Barrels are just part of the cost, nothing more.
Let's face it. The average guy using it to shoot coyotes or ghogs won't shoot that much in 2 years even if they throw in some steel plates and other playing. Even every two years spending 500.00 on a new barrel is chicken feed. Put it in perspective because for the fun thats brought into our lives shooting these barrel burners is unequalled in my opinion.
My gunsmith would like that, about 12 good days of groundhog hunting. Many days we shoot 50 to 75 shots. Matt600 to 700 rounds is a lot of coyotes, woodchucks, Pdogs, crows, ect.
Now if you use it to punch paper or plinking, well that is not the right option,
that's what 223 and 308s are for.
Dean
I am somewhat acquainted with one of the previous posters. He told me that in his years is shooting rock chuck's, pdogs, coyotes etc, to the tune of 100s of thou rounds, the 6 AI bbls lasted considerably longer than the 22-243. Same smiths, same actions/ bbls etc etc.....iowords - apples to apples over years of field "testing". The 6 Rem AI bbls even with the extra powder capacity lasted noticeably LONGER than the Middle stead iterations.