What is the neck diameter of a case fired in your chamber?
The chamber’s neck is too skinny to be shootin’ it with brass having a neck wall thickness avg. of ~ .0175”.
The chamber’s neck is too skinny to be shootin’ it with brass having a neck wall thickness avg. of ~ .0175”.
The chamber neck is not too skinny, the neck is too thick, and needs to be turned so the neck wall is 0.015" (or less).
It is possible I could be over annealing via slightly too high temperatures. I had not heard of this happening elsewhere but what you say seems to make sense. As usual I researched how I anneal and I have done it consistently. On my next two boxes of brass I can apply a test vs control to settle that.
All brass was clean inside and out (stainless media), chamfered, trimmed. Carbide expander ball on sizing. 200 Hybrids are tapered boat tails.
Now I'm wondering if 90 minutes in the tumbler mis-shaped the mouth again. Wouldn't think so.
Gonna re-size the failed ones and wipe clean. See if that helps. If not then I will try the old standard seater.
You have said earlier that the new factory brass seats the bullet fine, but your reloads do not. Perhaps you should take some once fired cases, skip the annealing, and see how they seat a bullet as a test.
I read where the stainless pins can damage ( roll over ) the case mouth. A tubing micrometer can read this, or you could chamfer the inside of the neck after tumbling.
Thanks John. I am willing to invest in the tools necessary to do this as I see it being very worth doing to get to more than two firings on expensive Lapua brass. Before ordering what's necessary I would feel better hearing confirmation that neck turning to fit a chamber is common practice.
"Just seated a brand new Lapua Palma. OD is .336 before and .338" after bullet seated."
"Second firings were .341 to .342 at the mouth. Mid neck were all .342. The neck near the shoulder .343."
This suggests to me that the brass in the neck is not too thick, and your chamber neck is not too tight, probably in the 0.342 to 0.344" taper range.
You don't have the problem with new brass, but you have it with two different seating dies after you have annealed. Sure points to the annealing process...
On measurements, it is certainly nice to have an ID micromenter, and a thickness micrometer. However, with a 1/10 thou OD micromenter and a blade vernier you can get the basic measurments. If you measure the bullet (probably will not be exactly 0.308"), the case before seating, and the case after seating, you can easily calculate average neck brass thickness. Also with the vernier gauge, you can check within a thou the thickness of the brass for any gross non uniform thickness.
However, I don't think your problem is with measurements. It is the seating that is deforming the brass. Do you lubricate the ID of the neck? I use powdered graphite to reduce seating force and seating tension.`
Here's what could be an important point that I overlooked. When raising the ram on new and once fired brass the ram travels smoothly all the way through. On twice fired there is point of resistance that "bumps" during travel that isn't there on subsequent re-seating if that bullet. Almost feels like its hitting the leading edge of the brass.
Check the dia of your bullets, there was a post that someone found 30 cal Berger bullets that were oversized in dia. They were about .310 or .311.
OK. So how does the new brass compare to as fired and after sizing, for overall length?
New Lapua Palma typically 2.006 to 2.007". First firing moves a couple thousandths and after second firing I trim about 25/100 slightly to a standard length of 2.010".
This is likely your answerI read where the stainless pins can damage ( roll over ) the case mouth. A tubing micrometer can read this, or you could chamfer the inside of the neck after tumbling.