I've read this thread a couple of times and certainly may have missed something. I don't see what your intended purpose for this rifle. If you are looking to punch paper and have some fun for yourself, a Savage is fine. I have owned several and still have a couple. If that is your purpose you are wasting $$ to go with a high end barrel, chamber job etc. The after market barrels from Criterion, Shilen, Pac Not etc will do just exactly what you want. It is really point less to bother with custom reamers, gunsmiths etc and build this around a Savage action. Short range benchrest rifles are the most accurate in the world and you will NEVER see a Savage in the winner list. If you want accuracy and really feel the need to go the custom route then get a custom action and go for it. If you want economics you can split the difference and get a Remington. For serious accuracy forget the Savage. They are fine for varmints, but that's about it. Last time I bought a Criterion it was just over $300 and it will do everything you can. Flame suit on.
Rick
I am the OP.
"Intended purpose" is to shoot 100 - 300 yards, at local ranges, paper targets. No competition...ever. Just building a rifle that I hope can shoot more often than not, .25" 5 shot groups at 100 yards with well developed quality hand-loaded ammo, if I drive the gun correctly, the wind cooperates, and am my shooting setup is ideal. That is probably a stretch goal, but given I can shoot fairly consistently, under 1/2" 5 shot groups off a bipod with a 223 AR-15, I hope a 6BR can do similarly or better.
You state "It is really point less to bother with custom reamers, gunsmiths etc and build this around a Savage action". You also state "you will NEVER see a Savage in the winner list", and "For serious accuracy forget the Savage". First, one must ask just WHY is a Savage not in the winner's circle. The following thread explains much.
http://benchrest.com/showthread.php?83962-Savage-vs-Custom-Action. Specifically, the following post. My comments are in red. My emphasis in bold.
---------
I can give my opinions based on experience with both.
I shoot Nesika and Bat custom actions in short-range BR. My husband (kinda thick in the head) had a purpose-built BR gun built on one of the very 1st available RBLP Target actions from Savage that he uses as a HV bag gun, and I have shot it from time to time as well.
When it's all said and done, here is what I find, having shot them both is registered competition and hundreds of rounds of practice and load development:
1st the Cons:
The action is big and heavy. It is also "clunky". Things rattle both in the action and in the bolt. Yes, yes--the floating bolthead,
I know.
It IS large and clunky feeling, at least stock out of the box.
The action requires a larger shank barrel than the customs, meaning that it is hard to fit a LV barrel to it because of the thread diameter. With the large shank, a HV barrel is easier to fit. This makes the barrel heavy.
Of no concern to me for my use.
Stock choice is limited. Very few stock makers offer short-range contour stocks for the Savage. Many are too heavy to use on a LV rifle.
Since I do not compete, this too is of no concern to me.
Even with the "Evolution" trigger, and a timing job, the bolt lift (without a case in the chamber) is almost twice as heavy as either of my custom actions. Read this to mean, it is twice as hard to lift the bolt. Read this to mean that lifting the bolt upsets the gun in the bags considerably more than with the custom actions. Read this to mean that it takes more time to get back on target after every shot. This is magnified greatly when unlocking the bolt on a fired case.
I am in no rush to get back on target. I am not competing. If conditions change, I'll wait or try my hand at compensating.
Even with the "Evolution" trigger, and a timing job, the bolt cam force (without a case in the chamber) is greater than either of my custom actions. Read this to mean, it is harder to close the bolt. Read this to mean that closing the bolt upsets the gun in the bags considerably more than with the custom actions. Read this to mean that it takes more time to get back on target after every shot. This is magnified slightly when chambering an actual round.
I am in no rush to get back on target. I am not competing.
The bolt is not coned nor is the barrel tapered, so most of the time feeding and chambering is not very smooth. It is possible to jam the round between the boltface and the flat of the barrel tenon. Either of these things happening can change the dimensions of the round, deform the bullet, or simply add to the hassle of having to dig the loaded case out of the action and guiding it into the chamber by hand.
Maybe so. I have operated the identical Long Range Precision Varminter and found no issues.
If you want to glue the action into the stock, the barrels have to be conventionally mounted against a shoulder, with the recoil lug permanently attached to the reciever. This means no barrel nut.
Gluing actions? I am not that hardcore, as a non-competitor.
The supplied trigger-guard is heavy.
Of zero concern to me.
Now the Pros:
The Savage action is capable of shooting the same size groups as the customs. Great.
If you have all day to shoot those groups that is.
I do. Both my husband and I have managed groups in the "ones", just not as many as with the customs. It is so hard to be smooth in the process of extracting, ejecting, and chambering rounds that too much time is required to get back on target between shots.
Of no real concern to me.
If you are a "runner" it is darn-near impossible to get all 5 record shots downrange before a condition change. It is simply no where near as fast. On my best attempts, I am AT LEAST twice as fast with the customs, and they DO NOT have ejectors fitted to them.
I shot a 300 Weatherby Mag 65 lb. open class NBRSA gun at 1000 yards with a custom action, and was a "runner". Yup, it is definitely faster than a Savage, but not using the Savage in competition, so...
It is 1/2 the price for the action.
Can always appreciate that!
It has a floating bolt-head.
Easily adjustable firing pin protrusion.
So, in actual use next to custom actions, I can say that the Savage action is every bit a accurate as the custom. It is just alot harder to use.
Can't disagree, just more effort to do everything, but not a big deal to me for a savings of over $500 and non-competition use.
Because of the weight of the action and bolt, the large diameter needed for the barrel, the limited availability of lightwieght stocks, and the heavy factory triggerguard it is almost impossible to get down into a 10-1/2 pound LV configuration.
Of absolutely no concern to me.
It is frustrating to use when compared to a custom.
At the end of the day, it wasn't any less expensive either. Gunsmithing costs are higher on the Savage (trigger, action timing, barreling, flat and parallel recoil lug, pinning the recoil lug, stock fitting, etc).
That's my two cents anyway,
Lisa
------------
In Lisa's experience, the accuracy is no different between a Savage and a custom, if you have the extra time to use the Savage and are OK with it being harder to use. Time is a complete non-issue for me, and I am OK with the extra effort to use, especially given the money saved. I do want very good accuracy, as described above, and will do all I can to see what I can make it deliver. Given Lisa's experience, the Savage action is the best for me, and a custom would be a waste of money. For a competitor, I can see how a Savage (or Remington in my opinion), would be a waste of money.
As an aside, I like to see what accuracy I can get out of different platforms. I did spend the bucks for a premium cut-rifled barrel and trigger on an AR-15. I just wanted to see how accurate an AR-15 could be and was quite pleased with that fun project.
Phil