6MMsteve
Gold $$ Contributor
I concurNothing you put forward is actually evidence of Savage bolt action being "better" than the other "budget" actions. First there is nothing budget about any of the Savage actions from a price standpoint for the action itself or for an entire rifle if looking for a rifle that does not require you to repurchase everything other than the bar stock receiver itself.
Aftermarket support is competently different than "better"! What you actual said is as backwards and misguided as someone that does not know the difference between clearances and tolerances and proceeds to spew nonsense.
A good example is the old school Chevy Small Block. At one point everyone and their mother made parts for it. You could buy performance parts very cheaply for it. They were so common that I once had a friend trade a case of beer for a fully dressed SBC over the CB radio in Hinesville Ga.! LOL None of that made the SBC a good design or a better design than say the early small hemi's, Olds Rocket Block, Pontiac Nail Head and on and on it just made them cheap, common and easy to source parts for! LOL
For the record while the 110 action and it's offspring are ugly, cheaply made and not well made from an engineering standpoint they are genius in how much money can be taken out of a Mauser design and still end up with a very functional action! I own a 12FV so I have nothing against Savage. I think it is shameful that they think the 110 and it's offspring are not already cheap enough and feel compelled to cheapen the design even more.