• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Why is the Savage Target Action better than other "budget" actions?

Nothing says you have to use a bat or a ppc. There were a bunch there that wasnt- they didnt get the honorable mention. Plenty of other actions and cartridges have come and gone in just my 22 or so years of doing it. Come on and join us- after a few years youll be shooting a ppc and a bat action im sure. The main reason for the bats is to grab somebodys spare barrel at a match if yours goes south plus at 100&200 you can pick out a faulty action real quick. You get burned a few times not able to sell an oddball action and being with a barrel that doesnt shoot youll see the light as well. Every top shooter actually does experiment.

That's what I'm saying. The "optimal solution" has been found. A rule chnage or a new class would push everything out of balance and everyone would need to discover the new optimal solution.

With modern carbon fiber stocks and barrels, I think a new lighter weight class would be doable and interesting. Give an advantage to 22s over the 6s cause recoil would be more of an issue.
 
That's what I'm saying. The "optimal solution" has been found. A rule chnage or a new class would push everything out of balance and everyone would need to discover the new optimal solution.

But nothing is saying you cant venture out- all the top shooters do, but you either shoot a ppc or get beat by a ppc. Call a top br gunsmith and ask him how many reamers he has for br that only have one chamber on them. Its not just one guy every once in a while
 
DSC_0216small.jpg
 
Two things jump out at me. A Farley action won. And Krieger barrels seem to be the mainstay. I would have never thought that.

What brand barrels did the top two shooters use?
Old farley actions are as good as they get (pre black widow) and krieger has been the most popular for a long time
 
I have a couple of the old Farley’s. One is a “Firefly”. Smoothest action I have felt.

I have a savage target action in a 6br that is slick as snot and shoots as good as most ppcs. I have owned several savage 110 actions. Some accurate, some not. I think it has more to do with the barrel than the action.
 
I have a couple of the old Farley’s. One is a “Firefly”. Smoothest action I have felt.

I have a savage target action in a 6br that is slick as snot and shoots as good as most ppcs. I have owned several savage 110 actions. Some accurate, some not. I think it has more to do with the barrel than the action.

Some actions just agg better than others. When you find one like that every barrel is a good one. Tony boyer’s old hart HV comes to mind
 
Can I ask what make Bat action so dominant? in question to Dusty Steven "Some actions just agg better than others".
 
Can I ask what make Bat action so dominant? in question to Dusty Steven "Some actions just agg better than others".

When people spend a year getting a rifle together they want to have the best chance at getting a good action. When you gamble with that much money and a year getting it together the safest bet is with a bat so thats the main reason
 
When people spend a year getting a rifle together they want to have the best chance at getting a good action. When you gamble with that much money and a year getting it together the safest bet is with a bat so thats the main reason
I'd argue a little differently. I think it's a mixture of looks, prestige, and herd mentality.

All the top actions (Panda, Borden, BAT, for example) have long proven track records of performance. The BAT is the prettiest, to my eye, mostly due to the bolt shroud design. Pandas are bulky and Bordens look like a Rem clone. But all of them are capable of setting records and winning matches, as they have demonstrated.
 
savage only drawback is the trigger only a few peeps make triggers but you can get one from SS that works well, but other than that they are ok but not for comp because of the bolt lift unless you shoot a 70lbs gun, other peeps will chime in than are more knowledgeable than me, I have a PTA and have had barrels that shoot bugholes all dayjust sold a 260ai that shoots great, but shooting comp and keeping the rifle stable in the bags for a fast firing string is a no go

Nothing you put forward is actually evidence of Savage bolt action being "better" than the other "budget" actions. First there is nothing budget about any of the Savage actions from a price standpoint for the action itself or for an entire rifle if looking for a rifle that does not require you to repurchase everything other than the bar stock receiver itself.

Aftermarket support is competently different than "better"! What you actual said is as backwards and misguided as someone that does not know the difference between clearances and tolerances and proceeds to spew nonsense.

A good example is the old school Chevy Small Block. At one point everyone and their mother made parts for it. You could buy performance parts very cheaply for it. They were so common that I once had a friend trade a case of beer for a fully dressed SBC over the CB radio in Hinesville Ga.! LOL None of that made the SBC a good design or a better design than say the early small hemi's, Olds Rocket Block, Pontiac Nail Head and on and on it just made them cheap, common and easy to source parts for! LOL

For the record while the 110 action and it's offspring are ugly, cheaply made and not well made from an engineering standpoint they are genius in how much money can be taken out of a Mauser design and still end up with a very functional action! I own a 12FV so I have nothing against Savage. I think it is shameful that they think the 110 and it's offspring are not already cheap enough and feel compelled to cheapen the design even more.
 
I'm not sure what advantage a 110 has over an Axis beside the more traditional recoil lug.

The Axis has a smallish ejection port compared to an open top. I'm not sure if it is stiffer than an open top single shot without a magazine cut but it might be and it's certainly stiffer than an open top receiver with a magazine cut.

A stiff receiver keeps the scope rail aligned with the bore.

The Axis also removes the need to free-float the rear tang because it doesn't have one. I'm sure this saves money because the receiver can be made with at least a 1" shorter piece of bar stock.

I wish they didn't do the weird recoil lug notch but beside that, I think their cost reductions are pretty good.

My Axis should do fine. A Savage Target action would probably be better. Many good customs would be better than that. I'm not sure where the other production actions would fall in line, especially when price is a factor. My Axis was $250 slightly used and has about $80 worth of take-off parts I could sell if I tried, making it about a $170 action with Accu-trigger. Maybe a surplus Mauser is cheaper than that but not by much and sporterizing it isn't free.
 
Nothing you put forward is actually evidence of Savage bolt action being "better" than the other "budget" actions. First there is nothing budget about any of the Savage actions from a price standpoint for the action itself or for an entire rifle if looking for a rifle that does not require you to repurchase everything other than the bar stock receiver itself.

Aftermarket support is competently different than "better"! What you actual said is as backwards and misguided as someone that does not know the difference between clearances and tolerances and proceeds to spew nonsense.

A good example is the old school Chevy Small Block. At one point everyone and their mother made parts for it. You could buy performance parts very cheaply for it. They were so common that I once had a friend trade a case of beer for a fully dressed SBC over the CB radio in Hinesville Ga.! LOL None of that made the SBC a good design or a better design than say the early small hemi's, Olds Rocket Block, Pontiac Nail Head and on and on it just made them cheap, common and easy to source parts for! LOL

For the record while the 110 action and it's offspring are ugly, cheaply made and not well made from an engineering standpoint they are genius in how much money can be taken out of a Mauser design and still end up with a very functional action! I own a 12FV so I have nothing against Savage. I think it is shameful that they think the 110 and it's offspring are not already cheap enough and feel compelled to cheapen the design even more.
I concur
 
There is one feature of a Savage action that I haven't seen mentioned. It has a floating bolt head that allows full lug contact, solid bolts with loose clearance at the rear allow the bolt to tip and push the upper lug away from the receiver lug. Custom actions maintain close tolerances at the rear and don't suffer from that problem. It was made as a cost cutting measure on the original 110 action, which was the proposed price of that model. It allows the rest of the action to be rough and still deliver superior accuracy. Unless my memory fails me, the Mosin Nagant has the same feature and gives better than expected accuracy.
 
Tikka action. PreFit barrels available. Good trigger after putting in an aftermarket spring. I have one in a Manners that I bought used on here. Great setup.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
167,026
Messages
2,226,941
Members
80,152
Latest member
FormulaZR
Back
Top