• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Which burn rate chart?

tikkaman308

Michael Scott
Gold $$ Contributor
I have been looking at burn rate charts for years(normally from a Hornady manual). I've noticed that different manuals have the powder burn rates in different order as to speed,so I assume the best chart to use would be the one in the Hodgdon annual manuals. The reason for my assumption is, they are the manufacturer. Which chart would you go by,when looking for powders in the same burn rate area as the powder you normally use but can't get or is no longer being made?
 
There are a number of different burn rate charts available from different powder manufacturers/suppliers such as Accurate, Hodgdon, Western, and Vectan. I have several and peruse them all from time to time. One thing to remember is that burn rate charts are really only a rough guide and the relationships between different powder burn rates as specified by their position number/place on the chart is only relative. Further, the range of useful burn rates for a given cartridge/bullet weight/barrel length may be wider than many think. One example would running fairly heavy 200 gr bullets in the .308 Win cartridge for use in F-TR competition. Powders used successfully by various F-TR shooters range from H4895 (#99 on the 2023 Hodgdon chart) to N150 (#124 on the 2023 Hodgdon chart). That's a pretty wide swath for a single cartridge; the point being there are usually a fair number of choices for any given combination that will work acceptably, if not necessarily be the very best choice available.
 
I have been looking at burn rate charts for years(normally from a Hornady manual). I've noticed that different manuals have the powder burn rates in different order as to speed,so I assume the best chart to use would be the one in the Hodgdon annual manuals. The reason for my assumption is, they are the manufacturer. Which chart would you go by,when looking for powders in the same burn rate area as the powder you normally use but can't get or is no longer being made?
You probably know this but those charts are just generalities. You really can't take much else from them as there are several factors that can effect burn rates. One such example I'll give, because I'm quite familiar with both powders and their characteristics is n120 vs h4198. A few charts show h4198 as being faster and that might or might not be true in some cartridges. I have used a lot of both in 30BR and 30 Major(grendel) cases. In every instance n120 has been faster, considerably so. In those two cartridges, it's about 2 full grains faster on average. That's not a small amount when you consider the case capacity involved here and that the chart would imply that a safe charge of h4198 would be safe with n120, but that is NOT the case. With the light bullets typically used in those two cases, it's hard to get enough h4198 in there to be dangerously hot but with n120, that's just not true and this is just one example where if you put 35.0 grains of n120 in a 30BR case, I'd pretty much promise extreme pressures or worse yet, it comes unwound on ya. I'm sure there are other examples but I'm just very familiar with this one.

Just be careful when using burn rate charts is all I'm saying. There's more to burn rates than meets the eye at times.
 
I always use Hodgdon. Has not let me down in 20 years until recently when I found out Vihtavouri N568 is significantly slower than N570 even tho it's listed as being about the same or slightly faster. But that's been the only hiccup with the chart that I've ever ran into and N568 is a relatively new powder offering from VV
 
You probably know this but those charts are just generalities. You really can't take much else from them as there are several factors that can effect burn rates. One such example I'll give, because I'm quite familiar with both powders and their characteristics is n120 vs h4198. A few charts show h4198 as being faster and that might or might not be true in some cartridges. I have used a lot of both in 30BR and 30 Major(grendel) cases. In every instance n120 has been faster, considerably so. In those two cartridges, it's about 2 full grains faster on average. That's not a small amount when you consider the case capacity involved here and that the chart would imply that a safe charge of h4198 would be safe with n120, but that is NOT the case. With the light bullets typically used in those two cases, it's hard to get enough h4198 in there to be dangerously hot but with n120, that's just not true and this is just one example where if you put 35.0 grains of n120 in a 30BR case, I'd pretty much promise extreme pressures or worse yet, it comes unwound on ya. I'm sure there are other examples but I'm just very familiar with this one.

Just be careful when using burn rate charts is all I'm saying. There's more to burn rates than meets the eye at times.
I understand what you saying,and I agree I have seen the same issues with powders for .308 and 6.5cm.....I actually am working on loads for my 30 br at the moment. I'm using LT30, but was looking at different options for powders. Not that the LT30 doesn't perform, but looking at different options for if and when LT30 can't be found,like H4198.
 
I understand what you saying,and I agree I have seen the same issues with powders for .308 and 6.5cm.....I actually am working on loads for my 30 br at the moment. I'm using LT30, but was looking at different options for powders. Not that the LT30 doesn't perform, but looking at different options for if and when LT30 can't be found,like H4198.
N130 is a good one but so is n120 ime. If you'r gun likes it, you'll love that powder. The old stuff was even better but it's still a great powder to work with and it will shoot. Meters fantastic too....Probably better than any powder I've ever used in anything. It just has limited use or I'd use it in everything possible.

edit....it likes pressure so don't let me scare you from testing it. Just know it's gonna act faster than some others and load accordingly. Nothing really new here. Just work up loads as usual with it. It has a smooth pressure curve and typically does not get stupid fast like some faster powders can do.
 
Last edited:
I have been looking at burn rate charts for years(normally from a Hornady manual). I've noticed that different manuals have the powder burn rates in different order as to speed,so I assume the best chart to use would be the one in the Hodgdon annual manuals. The reason for my assumption is, they are the manufacturer. Which chart would you go by,when looking for powders in the same burn rate area as the powder you normally use but can't get or is no longer being made?
Never used a burn rate chart. I look in the reloading manuals and see which powders give the highest fps for my bullet weight for a 6BR. I assume they are the most efficient powders for my cartridge. Also see what powders they are using at high levels of competition. Speed doesn't guarantee accuracy but that’s what I do.

Burn rate charts are not accurate. The burn rates are not determined with a rifle. The burn rates are determined with a closed cylinder that doesn't come close to resembling a rifle chamber. The powder they are evaluating is a fixed standard wt. So the test is done with a standard fixed volume cylinder that is bigger than a rifle chamber and reguardless what powder is being tested it's always the same wt. of powder.
 
Never used a burn rate chart. I look in the reloading manuals and see which powders give the highest fps for my bullet weight for a 6BR. I assume they are the most efficient powders for my cartridge. Also see what powders they are using at high levels of competition. Speed doesn't guarantee accuracy but that’s what I do.

Burn rate charts are not accurate. The burn rates are not determined with a rifle. The burn rates are determined with a closed cylinder that doesn't come close to resembling a rifle chamber. The powder they are evaluating is a fixed standard wt. So the test is done with a standard fixed volume cylinder that is bigger than a rifle chamber and reguardless what powder is being tested it's always the same wt. of powder.
Thank you Webster. I'd add that bore to capacity ratio can make a huge difference. Your post may indirectly indicate that too. I've literally seen people believe that a 6br and a 30br data can be interchangeable. This is very far from true, even with the same bullet weights, or close. Big difference. Most of us know these things but I thought that guy knew better too, until he proved me wrong. He didn't underway he had to beat his bolt open every shot. :oops:
 
Never used a burn rate chart. I look in the reloading manuals and see which powders give the highest fps for my bullet weight for a 6BR. I assume they are the most efficient powders for my cartridge. Also see what powders they are using at high levels of competition. Speed doesn't guarantee accuracy but that’s what I do.

Burn rate charts are not accurate. The burn rates are not determined with a rifle. The burn rates are determined with a closed cylinder that doesn't come close to resembling a rifle chamber. The powder they are evaluat is a fixed standard wt. So the test is done with a standard fixed volume cylinder that is bigger than a rifle chamber and reguardless what powder is being tested it's always the same wt. of powder.
Thank you for the information. Good to know.
 
Thank you Webster. I'd add that bore to capacity ratio can make a huge difference. Your post may indirectly indicate that too. I've literally seen people believe that a 6br and a 30br data can be interchangeable. This is very far from true, even with the same bullet weights, or close. Big difference. Most of us know these things but I thought that guy knew better too, until he proved me wrong. He didn't underway he had to beat his bolt open every shot. :oops:
Comparing a 6BR to a 30BR. As the bullet moves forward the cylinder that the powder burns in increases. The powder doesn't burn in just the case volume. The hole that the powder burns in increases at a different rate with a bigger diameter and wt. bullet. The burn rate should change from initial ignition to max pressure.
 
Last edited:
Comparing a 6BR to a 30BR. As the bullet moves forward the cylinder that the powder burns in increases. The powder doesn't burn in just the case volume. The hole that the powder burns in increases at a different rate with a bigger diameter and wt. bullet. The burn rate should change from initial ignition to max pressure.
I agree and I look at it like the chamber is from bolt face to the point where peak pressure happens, maybe 3 inches down the bore for example. And yes, 3 inches of 30 cal bore has a lot more expansion area vs 3 in of 6mm bore.
 
Burn rate charts are not a definite way to figure out the actual burn rate of a powder.

Good example would be RL-33... While it might give you some idea provided in data indicated for appropriate cartridges,.. once you use it in a slightly smaller case (example - 338 LapuaMag vs 300winmag), the burn rate of RL-33 in the 300winmag becomes much slower than logic would dictate. These 2 examples I know from experience.

Another example I came across is H-335 and H-4895 in the 7.62x39... Somehow the H-335 seems to burn a little bit slower in the x39 than H-4895 and I have to use more grains of H-335 to reach max than H-4895.

So burn rate charts are a rough guide of what powders could or could not work, but you can't use burn rate charts as a way to determine if one powder might need more fill in the case as opposed to the next powder below or above in the burn rate chart.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,438
Messages
2,195,830
Members
78,902
Latest member
Kapkadian
Back
Top