Tuners could really help out, in spades. I have had some remarkable success with factory sporter barrels with the rubber doughnut on the barrel, nothing short of amazing.
exactly
I’ve shot a lot of contours and I shoot short range bench rest for agg and score, 600 yard prone F, and PRS/NRL matches. I would say that the medium Palma or similar contour is where the accuracy gains start to become dramatic relative to smaller contours. With good factory ammo, you should be .5 MOA or below; with well-tuned reloads, you should be .3 or below all day. For hunting, that should be more than good. Moving up in the weight of the contour from there isn’t going to get you any additional benefit within the context of hunting.
I have spent literally years and $thousands trying to make light barreled hunting rigs shoot to my satisfaction, but to no avail. I am, at this point, pretty much done with the attempt and am now going to go with heavier tubes. I have had several rifles chambered by top name 'smiths with #2 tubes from Douglas and Hart and most recently three Bartlein 2Bs. My experience with these light contours is that one MOA 5-shot groups is what they are consistently capable of, even if being very careful to not let the barrel get hot. Very often I will have 4 shots in .5 MOA or so and one out about .5 to 1 inch. I may not be the best shot, but I KNOW if my crosshairs were .5 to 1 inch out at the trigger break or if I have had a significant wind shift.
Anyway, all of this leads to this question:
At what contour have you guys observed that barrels become significantly more consistent than the #2 and 3 contours?
I have also used a #4 Brux that was somewhat more consistent than my #2 and 3 contours and I have used two #5 contours that were significantly better than any of the lighter tubes, including the #4. I have asked this question of a couple of well known 'smiths. One of them said Light Palma is where things become noticeably better and the other said a #5.
What say you?
John