I have my own crown 'theory'. The smaller the bullet, the more critical the crown. A slight imperfection at the muzzle that results in a gas distribution anomaly, will have a far greater effect on a 20gr .17 vs a 300gr .338.
If an 11* crown is applied to a barrel that isn't perfectly centered, there will be a deviation along the axis of the bore of the contact point. Same goes for a chamfer applied that is off center, one 'side' of the barrel will be in contact longer, thus gas escaping out of the other side first.
If the muzzle is 90*, the contact can only be equal, regardless of how it was centered. For protection, a slightly recessed muzzle will fill that purpose, this is my personally preferred method. Next up, I've drawn the bores of all the different calibers, and created a brass sphere of the correct radius to provide a 45* edge break. I'll lightly lap the muzzle, spinning in the lathe, with the specific sphere until I've broken the edge of the groove to the 90* face.
I have excellent results on 17's, and this would translate into anything larger than those based on the crown 'theory'.
If an 11* crown is applied to a barrel that isn't perfectly centered, there will be a deviation along the axis of the bore of the contact point. Same goes for a chamfer applied that is off center, one 'side' of the barrel will be in contact longer, thus gas escaping out of the other side first.
If the muzzle is 90*, the contact can only be equal, regardless of how it was centered. For protection, a slightly recessed muzzle will fill that purpose, this is my personally preferred method. Next up, I've drawn the bores of all the different calibers, and created a brass sphere of the correct radius to provide a 45* edge break. I'll lightly lap the muzzle, spinning in the lathe, with the specific sphere until I've broken the edge of the groove to the 90* face.
I have excellent results on 17's, and this would translate into anything larger than those based on the crown 'theory'.