I don't know if you've ever heard of the following comments concerning the venerable .303 British: The .303, shot through the Enfields, displayed poor grouping characteristic at 100 yds, but when the shooting distance was extended to say, 500-1000yds, became much better performers. Also, by the same commenters, if rifles were zeroed at 100 yds, the groupings were substantially off to the right at those longer distances. The explanation then was given that the projectile had 'gotten to sleep'. [tazzman]
That's never been ascribed to the 'bullet going to sleep', well not at least on the east side of the Atlantic. It's a function of the non-rigid rear locking Enfield action causing 'positive compensation' that saw muzzle position at the time of bullet exit fortuitously 'compensate' for large differences in bullet barrel-time and hence MV variations in the as-issued arsenal .303 ball ammunition primarily used by British and British Commonwealth SR discipline shooters for generations. It substantially reduced on-target elevations, first showing at around 600 yards and becoming increasingly pronounced as you went by steps to 1,000. When Target Rifle using as issued 7.62 replaced .303 Service Rifle, it was practice amongst top shooters for maybe 10-15 years to have a Mauser system short-range rifle, but to retain an Enfield No.4 based job for the long-range 800 yards and up stages. That was ended with the Swing 4-lug and later Barnard etc 3-lug actions that were much better than either standard Mauser style twin-lug actions or the Enfield in coping with poor ammunition.