• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

What Brand Rings are these?

hoz53

Gold $$ Contributor
Okay I’ll try this again. Want to sell this set of quick detach rings but cannot figure out what brand they are. Does anybody know???

Closest I can see are Talley or Warne but they are not the same as these companies current offerings.

The rings are high quality, steel, 1” size. The base has the ruger style recoil lug. They fit and line up on a Ruger 77/22.

Any help would be appreciated and I’d even send you a Candy Cane reward ( Christmas Spirit)

Thanks. Hoz 53
 

Attachments

  • BF886080-4208-4FCD-8F88-418A5661190C.jpeg
    BF886080-4208-4FCD-8F88-418A5661190C.jpeg
    534.1 KB · Views: 93
  • 2B29110C-E98D-404F-BB60-4195870EBA2A.jpeg
    2B29110C-E98D-404F-BB60-4195870EBA2A.jpeg
    297 KB · Views: 85
  • 5F02FA9C-1469-49D6-B5EE-F5BE4E041BBA.jpeg
    5F02FA9C-1469-49D6-B5EE-F5BE4E041BBA.jpeg
    295.8 KB · Views: 91
My guess is older Warne design...light duty with one screw on top, offset split in the bottom of the ring to accommodate the integral recoil lug, similar levers.
 
The old Warne Premier detachable rings have that exact profile and single screw. They have been discontinued for quite a while. The Warne Premier were excellent rings, but required the Premier proprietary bases.

The set of Warne Premier rings I have are split in the center on the bottom, and don’t have the same profile on the bottom of the base as yours. The profile on the bottom of your rings looks like they may be made for a M77 Ruger, and that may also explain why the lower split is offset rather than centered.
 

Attachments

  • 9C8B39C6-02E2-4B48-B96C-D3D524072223.jpeg
    9C8B39C6-02E2-4B48-B96C-D3D524072223.jpeg
    339.7 KB · Views: 25
  • 0854EE1B-1EE9-45C8-9A00-6D941BC0E78F.jpeg
    0854EE1B-1EE9-45C8-9A00-6D941BC0E78F.jpeg
    338.2 KB · Views: 25
The old Warne Premier detachable rings have that exact profile and single screw. They have been discontinued for quite a while. The Warne Premier were excellent rings, but required the Premier proprietary bases.

The set of Warne Premier rings I have are split in the center on the bottom, and don’t have the same profile on the bottom of the base as yours. The profile on the bottom of your rings looks like they may be made for a M77 Ruger, and that may also explain why the lower split is offset rather than centered.
well thank you for that. these work on a 77/22 and will fit on a M77 but wont work as the m77 receiver rings are different dia and these bases are both the same height. someone told me they would fit on a #1 but dont know about that. I will call warne and see what they say. thanks again
 
My guess is older Warne design...light duty with one screw on top, offset split in the bottom of the ring to accommodate the integral recoil lug, similar levers.
well warne sounds like the best guess- thanks again
 
If they are the same height, they should work on the #1 & #3.

The Ruger 77 & MKIIs and I believe the Hawkeye use lower rings in the front.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,279
Messages
2,215,723
Members
79,518
Latest member
DixieDog
Back
Top