I did a complete Mauser project just for the fun of it. I wasn’t particularly concerned about the “cost” of it, I wanted to build a rifle based on a vintage action.Can't believe people are still wanting to use those old Mausers. Ends up costing more in the end to make them half way decent, and even then, they are still far weaker and less accurate than any of the current cheap factory actions. If I was smithing for customers, I wouldn't touch one for liability reasons
But, YOU did it YOUR way.I did a complete Mauser project just for the fun of it. I wasn’t particularly concerned about the “cost” of it, I wanted to build a rifle based on a vintage action.
Of course, i did not have to pay a gunsmith to put it all together, and I stayed within the pressure limits of what these actions were designed to handle., that being a 280 Remington at around 50,000 psi with 140 grn bullets.
But you are correct. If your sole aim is to build a rifle that can take advantage of all of the more modern cartridge designs and velocity capabilities with a wide range of bullets, building a rifle based on a old military action makes about as much sense as taking an old junked out ‘67 Chevelle and spending enough money on it to put the kids, and grandkids, through college.![]()
Can't believe people are still wanting to use those old Mausers. Ends up costing more in the end to make them half way decent, and even then, they are still far weaker and less accurate than any of the current cheap factory actions. If I was smithing for customers, I wouldn't touch one for liability reasons
To each his own on an opinion. But there are thousands of old Mauser actions out there that have been reworked and still being used to take shooting and hunting. They were and still are fine products to play with and use. Just something about having a seeing them still used.You don't have the same goals in mind, in rifles, or maybe in life.
That doesn't have to mean you don't understand.
That looks like a very nice job on that stock. I have a soft spot for those tang-safety Rugers too. WHI have a lot of respect for the Mauser and the innovation it brought to the industry, but they are definitely lacking by modern terms. I like the old Ruger M77 Tangs and M70s for Mauser style actions if that's the look a person is going for. Very strong and reliable and not much modifications needed.
I re-barreled this old M77 tang in 6mm Remington. Had it powder coated and did all the stock work myself. Made a great classic looking Mauser style rifle. Topped it off with an old Japanese built Tasco scope. Shot really good and loved the look of that stipled fancy walnut
View attachment 1533730View attachment 1533731
Mee too! I also have a 100% factory original heavy barrel 'red pad' M77 in 6mm Remington thats almost mint condition. I believe the factory barrels were made by Douglas back when this one was built. Never touched a thing on this rifle other than lightening the trigger, even the bluing is original. Topped with an older Japanese bulit Bushnell 6-24 AO scope. Dont shoot it much anymore as they seem to be gaining collectors value in this condition, but it is very accurate with my handloads. Also have and old mint condition Shootings Times magazine from 1968 when the Ruger M77 made its debut. Adds a little nostalgia to the old M77 when I show it to peopleThat looks like a very nice job on that stock. I have a soft spot for those tang-safety Rugers too. WH
Correction, a copy of the M98 with "many improvements". I've owned and shot both Rugers and old Mausers over the years.Those old Ruger's are cool, But, The angled recoil lug and the built in mounts and cast receivers in my book don't make them any better than an FN Supreme Mauser 98 or even a Santa Barbara M98 commercial Mauser.
The Ruger is just a copy of the M98 with a couple of subtle changes.