Keith Glasscock
Gold $$ Contributor
Right. And, how many people are taken in.Simple rule of thumb as late is if they aren’t taking credit cards and are asking for Venmo, PP F&F etc it’s best to just run. As stated many times before, I don’t understand how a fraudulent site can keep operating, its like there’s no repercussions.
Someone posted once that the "s" in the https means it's a"secure" website.. I guess that's not true anymore, if it ever was
So the internet provider is assuring people that their information won't get hacked, while they are getting ripped off. Nice. Where are the "fact-checkers" when we need them ?Of course, the only security the "s" in https provides is the ostensible incorruptibility of one's connection to that site ... even if the site in question is fraudulent.
Gotta love the minefield that is the Internet. Lots of holes to step in.
So the internet provider is assuring people that their information won't get hacked,
When 44 gave away control of the internet to a "World Body" where there's no accountability
Unless I am mistaken the thread is about the proliferation of scam web sites and not specifically about SSL security Certificates. Even then, the permission to produce and certify certificates was controlled by, I think it was ICCN, or something like that.Which is totally unrelated to SSL certificates and what SSL protects against.