I had a Remington Model 17 and a Mauser Model 96 do that in both caces it was an improperly bedded action.Why? Shooting at 300 yards. 3 shots nice and tight (1 inch) and then 3 more about an inch away that are also nice and tight. What the heck. It happens alot. Me, the gun, the powder/primer/bullet. 24.7 grains of Varget, 80 grain Berger, CCI 450. ??????????
Kids in the back did the work?Bedding? My used 1965 Winchester model 70 internal magazine was to long, after new barrel & new bedding. The action screw will be tight, but action can still move.
A well known 1960s gunsmith shop did the work. He was retired. Kids in the back room did the work.
When i took gun back, guy tightened action screw. Broke floor plate. New/Used floor plate didnt seat into wood stock. Not latching.
So called "gunsmith" turned rifle so its resting on my new 6x18 Redfield scope.
Take a very large screw driver, plastic end and pounded on the floor plate, to seat into the wood.
That A Hole almost died that day.
Sold M70. Bought Remigton 40 X.
Learned to do my own bedding/gun smithing.
Brett, I question that myself. Even if the shots were placed in succession, if the shooting does not have the same placement on the gun from shot to shot, it can generate 2 sometimes several impact points. I've seen this happen with shooters at the range whether on the bench or prone.Makes me wonder if he shot all 6 at th e same time how it would look
"WE" are the weakest link in the rifle system, provided the system and load is solid.Brett, I question that myself. Even if the shots were placed in succession, if the shooting does not have the same placement on the gun from shot to shot, it can generate 2 sometimes several impact points. I've seen this happen with shooters at the range whether on the bench or prone.
Most of the time with these types of posts, evaluation goes way off into the weeds but what is commonly overlooked, is the shooter.
I've witnessed one dude fire a round of 10 shots and have 3 beautiful groups in 3 different locations. 4, 3 and 3. Also seen shots volley back and forth between 2 impact points. All because of inconsistent buttstock pressures. Doesn't take much to shift an impact.
Well spoken"WE" are the weakest link in the rifle system, provided the system and load is solid.
Bingo Spot on Assessment!Brett, I question that myself. Even if the shots were placed in succession, if the shooting does not have the same placement on the gun from shot to shot, it can generate 2 sometimes several impact points. I've seen this happen with shooters at the range whether on the bench or prone.
Most of the time with these types of posts, evaluation goes way off into the weeds but what is commonly overlooked, is the shooter.
I've witnessed one dude fire a round of 10 shots and have 3 beautiful groups in 3 different locations. 4, 3 and 3. Also seen shots volley back and forth between 2 impact points. All because of inconsistent buttstock pressures. Doesn't take much to shift an impact.
I'm having a similar issue with my 6x45. I've been working up loads of 55, 58, 75 and 80 grain bullets. I did ladder tests with each from an un weighted lead sled. All were clustered pretty well together 2 inches high and 3 inches right. When finished I took what I had most of and corrected for zero 2" high. The next day I took the same loads and shot a 3 shot group with each off sand bags. The poi shifted 2.5 inches left. So if had shot the day before off sand bags all loads would have been pretty much zeroed 2" high. So has anyone else seen a poi shift from sand bags to lead sled or do I have another issue. I'm going to resort off sand bags tomorrow to check zero.I thought he was shooting the exact same load which arbitrarily changed POI after a 3 shot group. Am I wrong with this interpretation?
If not, I have never seen the exact same load arbitrarily change 3 shot groups unless a scope, rings, mount,parallax, or something else was wrong.
Never saw 3 shot groups just suddenly jump into another 3 shot group and inch or may away with the exact same load. Have I seen shots jump all over the target to to a load that is unsuited? Sure.
Then maybe my interpretation of the post was wrong.
I just shot this yesterday, any thoughts? After shot 3.................
There's a clue for yaI really really tried to be consistent in manners. (5 is under 6, this is at 600y BTW.) With a tenth more powder it doesn't seem to do this, but maybe a bit less accuracy is masking the split?
My rifle is a 24" heavy barrel, free float hand gaurd and I was only shooting at 50 yards. Like I said, I will try them again tomorrow off the sand bags. This is a hunting rifle not competition and I hunt mostly from tree stands. I usually lay the forend in my hand wheather off the bench or in the stand so that the condition is consistent. Of course I didn't do that on the lead sled, however I guess I could have.I'm having a similar issue with my 6x45. I've been working up loads of 55, 58, 75 and 80 grain bullets. I did ladder tests with each from an un weighted lead sled. All were clustered pretty well together 2 inches high and 3 inches right. When finished I took what I had most of and corrected for zero 2" high. The next day I took the same loads and shot a 3 shot group with each off sand bags. The poi shifted 2.5 inches left. So if had shot the day before off sand bags all loads would have been pretty much zeroed 2" high. So has anyone else seen a poi shift from sand bags to lead sled or do I have another issue. I'm going to resort off sand bags tomorrow to check zero.
Brett, I question that myself. Even if the shots were placed in succession, if the shooting does not have the same placement on the gun from shot to shot, it can generate 2 sometimes several impact points. I've seen this happen with shooters at the range whether on the bench or prone.
Most of the time with these types of posts, evaluation goes way off into the weeds but what is commonly overlooked, is the shooter.
I've witnessed one dude fire a round of 10 shots and have 3 beautiful groups in 3 different locations. 4, 3 and 3. Also seen shots volley back and forth between 2 impact points. All because of inconsistent buttstock pressures. Doesn't take much to shift an impact.
Not that I am an expert shooter but lots of mistaken odd looking groups are blamed on the rifle or the load when in fact either the shooter or the other equipment (bench, rest, rear bag, etc.) is at fault. If a shooter is consistently seeing these divided or odd looking groups I would suggest taking an inventory of all the items mentioned and the attitude of the body when approaching the shot. It is common knowledge if your crosshairs move off of the POA as you over take the rifle preparing for the shot you are setting your self up for an ugly group whether it happens or not. One well know retired F-class shooter explains it on a video with Erik Cortina on "Believe the Target". Shooting "free recoil" or some variation thereof is the answer to this equation for many but that requires a technique well developed and good concentration to do exactly the same thing every shot."WE" are the weakest link in the rifle system, provided the system and load is solid.
Yes, very much this ^^^Not that I am an expert shooter but lots of mistaken odd looking groups are blamed on the rifle or the load when in fact either the shooter or the other equipment (bench, rest, rear bag, etc.) is at fault. If a shooter is consistently seeing these divided or odd looking groups I would suggest taking an inventory of all the items mentioned and the attitude of the body when approaching the shot. It is common knowledge if your crosshairs move off of the POA as you over take the rifle preparing for the shot you are setting your self up for an ugly group whether it happens or not. One well know retired F-class shooter explains it on a video with Erik Cortina on "Believe the Target". Shooting "free recoil" or some variation thereof is the answer to this equation for many but that requires a technique well developed and good concentration to do exactly the same thing every shot.
I just got back in from checking my zero with my hand on the sand bag and forend on my hand. Group did move a little but not near as much as going from sand bags unsupported to lead sled. I shot 2 each of 55, 58, 75, 95 and 100 grain bullets. All were in a nice little cluster. Then made final adjustments and shot last two with the 55 grain bullets so all should be centered left to right, 2" high. This is my typical deer zero, I just hold for wind and use maximum point blank range for elevation. This will get me out to 300 yards or so which is about where the 6x45 will drop to @2000 fps. I've seen videos where people shot from various bypods, sand bags and rests and claim there is no POI. This has not been my experience!My rifle is a 24" heavy barrel, free float hand gaurd and I was only shooting at 50 yards. Like I said, I will try them again tomorrow off the sand bags. This is a hunting rifle not competition and I hunt mostly from tree stands. I usually lay the forend in my hand wheather off the bench or in the stand so that the condition is consistent. Of course I didn't do that on the lead sled, however I guess I could have.
This is why I always try to remember to zero my rifle with the forend resting on my hand. I always have it with me, . That way whether I'm shooting off a tree limb or the rail on my tree stand the zero should be the same.I just got back in from checking my zero with my hand on the sand bag and forend on my hand. Group did move a little but not near as much as going from sand bags unsupported to lead sled. I shot 2 each of 55, 58, 75, 95 and 100 grain bullets. All were in a nice little cluster. Then made final adjustments and shot last two with the 55 grain bullets so all should be centered left to right, 2" high. This is my typical deer zero, I just hold for wind and use maximum point blank range for elevation. This will get me out to 300 yards or so which is about where the 6x45 will drop to @2000 fps. I've seen videos where people shot from various bypods, sand bags and rests and claim there is no POI. This has not been my experience!