• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Tuners

That! I know many who win big matches and I shoot with some on occasion....some only use a fixed weight that looks like a tuner. If it is a tuner it is never touched! Some have even taken them off when rebarreling. These are guys my age and have shot out many barrels over 50-60 years!
Then, monkey see, monkey do it. Sorry, but that's all that your post tells me about your own tuner testing. Not intended to be an attack but just please, give me something besides what others that don't want to accept anything different. If it works for them, no reason why it won't work as well for you. Seriously, I'm not trying to argue and we should all do what we think gives us the best chance to win. But I call BS on things that are based on the way things were done 60 years ago unless you can definitively tell me why that method is best. There are shooters that can beat most of us with a broomstick. Not gonna argue but I will hope to hear a scientific reason that supports your position.
 
Now my next question would be, considering different harmonics and speed of sound in different mterials
Should a tuner be light, (Made from Aluminum)
Or as heavy and dense as possible (Lead or Tungsten)
???
I'm thinking SG of at least 10.0 or more would be more beneficial
(show most difference in change with small incremental adjustments)
This sucks, now I'm gonna have to make one :/
Ahhh...good question. For the most part, heavier is better but with counterintuitive exceptions. That being, the stiffer the beam, the sooner a tuner can become too heavy. Talking BR contours here. Not hunting bbls. I found about 12 ounces as a safe max for any contour tested, including 16" 1.450 straights. Actually tried some reverse engineering that turned this up. I think any tuner between even zero added weight to about 12 ounces will work but I prefer tuners that are toward the heavier end of that over lighter ones. That's when we see drastic changes in how they work. A little can make a large difference. I tested this with different weights, medias and locations relative to the muzzle, quite a bit.
 
While I realize this may "Sound" farfetched
There is a lot going on in the barrel we can't see or monitor
such as how fast or when pressure builds at certain points in the barrel
We can ony measure the max pressure
it would interesting and useful to gauge pressure at certain intervals down the barrel in time with the bullets travel down the barrel.
----------------------------
This is absolutely false. A Pressure Trace system that measures the stretch of the bbl can and does see primer ignition, peak pressure and bullet exit. Not sure if they are still in business but my PT system came from RSI ballistics, IIRC. It uses strain gauges to convert stretch to current that can be graphed. We overlayed this with vibration to establish exit time relative to muzzle position.
 
This is absolutely false. A Pressure Trace system that measures the stretch of the bbl can and does see primer ignition, peak pressure and bullet exit. Not sure if they are still in business but my PT system came from RSI ballistics, IIRC. It uses strain gauges to convert stretch to current that can be graphed. We overlayed this with vibration to establish exit time relative to muzzle position.
Really?
Well why didn't somebody tell somebody then?
I hadn't read that anybody was measuring pressures in this manner
More good info, you're quite an excellent informant
-----------
However I still believe in rare (very rare and likely almost must be perfect conditions for it to happen)
circumstances that powder can go from deflagration to detonation
Such as Nitromethane can also do the same, after they found out when shipping some by train and it went off,
And thats what I find would be difficult to duplicate and measure.....
... if colliding standing waves are a contributor since it is the supersonic wavefront that sets off an explosive.
Which would be even more interesting to me if a tuner could alter this occurence as well
 
Last edited:
Really?
Well why didn't somebody tell somebody then?
I hadn't read that anybody was measuring pressures in this manner
I could send a pic! RSI Laboratories is right, I think. They may be out of business. My unit quit after leaving it plugged up in a thunderstorm that happened overnight. Musta been pretty sensitive because it was plugged into a usb port on the computer and the only thing that died from the storm, was the Pressure Trace system.
 
I’m not so sure about these one.
This may help provide anyone with a good understanding of "PC" within the context of this thread.
I had to refamiliarize myself as well to be sure I was understanding correctly as it relates to tuners.
Positive Compensation vs Negative Compensation
explained in Post #6
 
Then, monkey see, monkey do it. Sorry, but that's all that your post tells me about your own tuner testing. Not intended to be an attack but just please, give me something besides what others that don't want to accept anything different. If it works for them, no reason why it won't work as well for you. Seriously, I'm not trying to argue and we should all do what we think gives us the best chance to win. But I call BS on things that are based on the way things were done 60 years ago unless you can definitively tell me why that method is best. There are shooters that can beat most of us with a broomstick. Not gonna argue but I will hope to hear a scientific reason that supports your position.
This is why I normally refrain from engaging in a peeing contest. Its interesting that you mention pressure tracing. The testing I have done and seen from others indicates big variances in chamber pressure. My experiences with tuners has been much like many others. Trigger, trigger fall consistency, trigger timing, brass consistency, primers, powder, friction, heat, and a host of other things cause barrel harmonics and dynamic changes within the barrel, shot after shot. Even with match primers, the abundance of pressure trace data illustrates that you can run a test on 10 different primers one day and get different info the next day. A powder manufacturer assured me that nobody would ever calculate the surface area of every kernel in a load, but weighing powder is the best we can do. Just because the weight indicates the same, that does not mean the square inch area of exposed powder is the same. Mass versus surface is not exactly the same, shot to shot. You nor anyone else knows what variable may come up on the next shot. Although small, they are variables. Pressure Trace indicates this with the wide swings in pressure. One shooter may experience 5,000 psi high to low. The next guy could experience up to 7,000 psi, and some have seen a bad primer lose 10,000 psi from the high. These are match primers. We are not talking 60 years ago stuff as you mention. I have seen guys make a tuner adjustment (one builds tuners and win matches), yet he says, where the heck did that come from. You tell me how you know exactly where to move a tuner in the middle of a match that will compensate for the variables that you are not even aware of. I've done plenty of testing on barrel harmonics and counting pixels. We have a patent pending on a pressure regulating device that could show some promise. Air gun guys figured this out long ago. Now they use regulators. I realize mixing air guns with a powder burner is apples to oranges, but it gets to the point that its really a pressure thing, shot to shot, causing much of our problems. Folks are doing the best with what we have and may I say, doing well! If folks want to use tuners, go for it. I hope it works for you. Its not my inability to know what to do with a tuner. Thats why I don't use one. We sure don't need to make out like it's the magic bullet! I often can widen the node with just a 2-3 oz weight and do my load develop. That's no magic bullet either and that's why probably nobody on this thread is winning every match they attend!
 
This is why I normally refrain from engaging in a peeing contest. Its interesting that you mention pressure tracing. The testing I have done and seen from others indicates big variances in chamber pressure. My experiences with tuners has been much like many others. Trigger, trigger fall consistency, trigger timing, brass consistency, primers, powder, friction, heat, and a host of other things cause barrel harmonics and dynamic changes within the barrel, shot after shot. Even with match primers, the abundance of pressure trace data illustrates that you can run a test on 10 different primers one day and get different info the next day. A powder manufacturer assured me that nobody would ever calculate the surface area of every kernel in a load, but weighing powder is the best we can do. Just because the weight indicates the same, that does not mean the square inch area of exposed powder is the same. Mass versus surface is not exactly the same, shot to shot. You nor anyone else knows what variable may come up on the next shot. Although small, they are variables. Pressure Trace indicates this with the wide swings in pressure. One shooter may experience 5,000 psi high to low. The next guy could experience up to 7,000 psi, and some have seen a bad primer lose 10,000 psi from the high. These are match primers. We are not talking 60 years ago stuff as you mention. I have seen guys make a tuner adjustment (one builds tuners and win matches), yet he says, where the heck did that come from. You tell me how you know exactly where to move a tuner in the middle of a match that will compensate for the variables that you are not even aware of. I've done plenty of testing on barrel harmonics and counting pixels. We have a patent pending on a pressure regulating device that could show some promise. Air gun guys figured this out long ago. Now they use regulators. I realize mixing air guns with a powder burner is apples to oranges, but it gets to the point that its really a pressure thing, shot to shot, causing much of our problems. Folks are doing the best with what we have and may I say, doing well! If folks want to use tuners, go for it. I hope it works for you. Its not my inability to know what to do with a tuner. Thats why I don't use one. We sure don't need to make out like it's the magic bullet! I often can widen the node with just a 2-3 oz weight and do my load develop. That's no magic bullet either and that's why probably nobody on this thread is winning every match they attend!
While I haven't measured, the reportedly velocity uniformity of air rifles is amazing. Even for springers. We have a lot to learn.
 
This is why I normally refrain from engaging in a peeing contest. Its interesting that you mention pressure tracing. The testing I have done and seen from others indicates big variances in chamber pressure. My experiences with tuners has been much like many others. Trigger, trigger fall consistency, trigger timing, brass consistency, primers, powder, friction, heat, and a host of other things cause barrel harmonics and dynamic changes within the barrel, shot after shot. Even with match primers, the abundance of pressure trace data illustrates that you can run a test on 10 different primers one day and get different info the next day. A powder manufacturer assured me that nobody would ever calculate the surface area of every kernel in a load, but weighing powder is the best we can do. Just because the weight indicates the same, that does not mean the square inch area of exposed powder is the same. Mass versus surface is not exactly the same, shot to shot. You nor anyone else knows what variable may come up on the next shot. Although small, they are variables. Pressure Trace indicates this with the wide swings in pressure. One shooter may experience 5,000 psi high to low. The next guy could experience up to 7,000 psi, and some have seen a bad primer lose 10,000 psi from the high. These are match primers. We are not talking 60 years ago stuff as you mention. I have seen guys make a tuner adjustment (one builds tuners and win matches), yet he says, where the heck did that come from. You tell me how you know exactly where to move a tuner in the middle of a match that will compensate for the variables that you are not even aware of. I've done plenty of testing on barrel harmonics and counting pixels. We have a patent pending on a pressure regulating device that could show some promise. Air gun guys figured this out long ago. Now they use regulators. I realize mixing air guns with a powder burner is apples to oranges, but it gets to the point that its really a pressure thing, shot to shot, causing much of our problems. Folks are doing the best with what we have and may I say, doing well! If folks want to use tuners, go for it. I hope it works for you. Its not my inability to know what to do with a tuner. Thats why I don't use one. We sure don't need to make out like it's the magic bullet! I often can widen the node with just a 2-3 oz weight and do my load develop. That's no magic bullet either and that's why probably nobody on this thread is winning every match they attend!
I agree with much of your rant. I also win my share of matches as do many others that tune the way I do.

Beyond that, ya kinda lost me.
 
While I haven't measured, the reportedly velocity uniformity of air rifles is amazing. Even for springers. We have a lot to learn.
Sure is and a .750 straight air rifle bbl provided the very first bit of data that I've referred to.
Frankly, it's a lot easier to find people to question things than it is to find people to do the testing for themselves. Not you, as I'm sure you understand.
 
This may help provide anyone with a good understanding of "PC" within the context of this thread.
I had to refamiliarize myself as well to be sure I was understanding correctly as it relates to tuners.
Positive Compensation vs Negative Compensation
explained in Post #6
Interesting post from the office T-Rex, with all due respect I’ve never heard of him or seen him on any firing line. Which long range competitor would he be ?
Thx
 
Interesting post from the office T-Rex, with all due respect I’ve never heard of him or seen him on any firing line. Which long range competitor would he be ?
Thx
Good question, Perhaps get on "the Hide" and ask him as well about the info I relayed
Supposedly he was asked by the Military to solve some problems for them as he states here in post 271...
could be how he gained part of his experience


Here is some more info on the subject - Rimfire but the principle stills holds
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,802
Messages
2,203,309
Members
79,110
Latest member
miles813
Back
Top