• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Tuners

Seriously? Why haven't you seen that? Everyone else has seen you bested by other using tuners. One has to look no further than the results of Tack Driver 5 for this evidence. IMHO, false statements such as the above are self inflicted damage to credibility.
You missed my point. The slogan was shoot a tuner or get beat by one, meaning they were such an advantage that eventually they would be on every rifle. And you wouldnt win a match without one. Thats not the case. It has not happened. I didnt mean I have never been beaten by a guy using one, in no way was that what I meant. Im just going off of experience gained from 100s of rifles and 1000s of barrel and all the shooters I have worked with.
 
I shoot with some of the best in the world whose names they would not want mentioned. 100/200 BR, Tack Driver, Long range bench and f-class, and several ELR guys. The few who have them do not touch them. It is literally an ornament on the end of the barrel, be it right or wrong. I realize you have a product to sell and thats ok. I rest my case.
I have been using tuners for close 20 years. Never moved one at a match yet. But they have kept me in tune being competitive and winning way more than my share of matches with limited resources. I don't move them during a match because I don't consider myself knowledgeable enough to do so. Also a good reason some should not offer opinions when they not only don't have the knowledge but have no experience on the subject.
 
Last edited:
I would not consider moving mine during a match unless shooting unlimited sighters was available to me. I use a little saying that works for probably no one else but me...LOL......Down & Out....When the temp goes down I adjust the tuner out, then hit the sighter. I am by NO means a scientific guy. You don't have to know all the whys to make these things work for you......At least that has been my experience.

Regards
Rick
 
Wtf does it have to do with any one range Mike? Tuners are in use here at about the same rate as elsewhere in the 1000 yard game. I'll be heading down after work Thursday to shoot actual real matches again. I don't have any ornaments on any of the barrels making this trip, but that doesn't mean there aren't any in my house. Moving towards bigger calibers, so the brakes I guess are sort of fixed ornaments.

They move poi around at 1000 also, I've seen that personally...that's about as far as I got on my "version 3" of trying to find what advantage they could provide for my game. I'm not shooting every non work day these days, so testing back burner shit just doesn't get done. I know it to be fact that we still can NOT use the wrong load. You can turn that sucker all you want, you can even use your mouth if that's your thing. You're not finishing at the top if the load isn't right, with or without tuners.

At this point I see guns with tuners competing and winning, although the rifles are tuned with loading still. I see no disadvantages not having one also, so time will tell. Seems odd that close all (possible 100%) of the records in 1000 yard are without. I think it's just dumb luck, but it is a fact either way.

Thanks, Tom
When I said range, I could have used the word geography just as easily. Some ranges(geographical areas) see more tuner use than others, for any number of reasons, as I'm sure you can imagine. That's all I was saying.

As for the rest of your post, all I can say is that there are a lot of people that will disagree with you and surely, there are also those that will agree, too. But yes, there are several examples of records in SR, 600 and 1000 yard f class and br. But frankly, records are great but aggs are where matches are won. Keeping a rifle/load in peak tune over the course of a day or multiple days is what a tuner can do. And, they can be used to tune when traveling long distances pre-loaded.

But lets get some things straight, because some of your remarks imply things that I do not claim.

1. I've never said that you can't win without a tuner
2. I've never claimed that tuners replace normal load work up.
3. I've never claimed that tuners will make your smallest groups smaller, if you were well tuned before. They can only improve tune if you're not really in tune. Perfect tune is perfect tune, either way.

They are a tool, not a crutch. If you feel like your tune never changes, you don't need a tuner...but that literally flies in the face of physics and chemistry. If ya go pre loaded and tune goes away with a tuner, you can fix it. Without a tuner, you're stuck with an out of tune rifle.

You act like I haven't been around this game for 20+ years and your remarks appear to misrepresent what I have said and come across quite condescendingly.

This has been a good thread. It doesn't need to become a pissing match because you feel differently, for whatever reason. Clearly, by the number of pages and posts made here, there are a lot of people that have found this thread to be of value. I know for sure too, that a lot of people are reading it but not commenting to avoid the pissing match that derogatory remarks tend to lead to. It's pretty simple really. Scroll on by or add something of value, please.
 
Last edited:
When I said range, I could have used the word geography just as easily. Some ranges(geographical areas) see more tuner use than others, for any number of reasons, as I'm sure you can imagine. That's all I was saying.

As for the rest of your post, all I can say is that there are a lot of people that will disagree with you and surely, there are also those that will agree, too. But yes, there are several examples of records in SR, 600 and 1000 yard f class and br. But frankly, records are great but aggs are where matches are won. Keeping a rifle/load in peak tune over the course of a day or multiple days is what a tuner can do. And, they can be used to tune when traveling long distances pre-loaded.

But lets get some things straight, because some of your remarks imply things that I do not claim.

1. I've never said that you can't win without a tuner
2. I've never claimed that tuners replace normal load work up.
3. I've never claimed that tuners will make your smallest groups smaller, if you were well tuned before. They can only improve tune if you're not really in tune. Perfect tune is perfect tune, either way.

They are a tool, not a crutch. If you feel like your tune never changes, you don't need a tuner...but that literally flies in the face of physics and chemistry. If ya go pre loaded and tune goes away with a tuner, you can fix it. Without a tuner, you're stuck with an out of tune rifle.

You act like I haven't been around this game for 20+ years and your remarks appear to misrepresent what I have said and come across quite condescendingly.

This has been a good thread. It doesn't need to become a pissing match because you feel differently, for whatever reason. Clearly, by the number of pages and posts made here, there are a lot of people that have found this thread to be of value. I know for sure too, that a lot of people are reading it but not commenting to avoid the pissing match that derogatory remarks tend to lead to. It's pretty simple really. Scroll on by or add something of value, please.
Actually I just don't want folks to feel like because they shoot at this range that they are somehow retarded like you literally did imply. Nothing I said is condescending so don't be an ass just because a guy or gal might chose to come shoot here. To be honest, an apology would have sufficed.

Me trying to tell you how tuners can work is like you telling me how to tune a 1,000 yard rifle. I wouldn't even try, nor did I, and especially not in a condescending way.

This is a place people test/tune and verify if the rifles are or are not going out of tune, and adjust if necessary. And so therefore, nothing is "felt", it is proven fact and adjustments are made accordingly.

And just FYI, there are more records having to do with aggregates than single targets...like 4 to 1 ratio, and they take months to complete.

Thanks, Tom
 
What’s wrong with asking for multiple opinions and comparing notes ?
Definitely Nothing wrong with asking people, but a lot of what happens is people just want to talk .. at some point you have to pick a path and see how the dust settles…if you don’t like the approach change some shit up and again document results actual results and not “theory” or “what ifs” get out there and figure some shit out.. who gives a Rats ass if it lines up with another approach… to get them to work properly or effectively really is not a esoteric situation at all…

Shawn Williams
 
Take it as you will. It was meant to carry a point but with humor, not crap. Yes, sometimes, less IS more. If you don't agree, that's ok. We can agree to disagree and move on.

One more analogy is...you get 5 opinions and 4 are wrong. Do you average them to get the answer you want or do you test for yourself?

Really no wrong answers give, people just get butt hurt when people have a different approach… my biggest takeaway in all things tuning is try some shit … tuners are no different and it’s total ok if it doesn’t work just pick another path… my biggest decision come from “potential “ what my targets suggest has “potential “ period it’s a ever evolving study and we sure have learned a lot along the way with this approach… it’s not always anecdotal because people don’t understand

Shawn Williams
 
Actually I just don't want folks to feel like because they shoot at this range that they are somehow retarded like you literally did imply. Nothing I said is condescending so don't be an ass just because a guy or gal might chose to come shoot here. To be honest, an apology would have sufficed.

Me trying to tell you how tuners can work is like you telling me how to tune a 1,000 yard rifle. I wouldn't even try, nor did I, and especially not in a condescending way.

This is a place people test/tune and verify if the rifles are or are not going out of tune, and adjust if necessary. And so therefore, nothing is "felt", it is proven fact and adjustments are made accordingly.

And just FYI, there are more records having to do with aggregates than single targets...like 4 to 1 ratio, and they take months to complete.

Thanks, Tom
I hope no one believes that I was calling them retarded. I didn't say that, nor anything like that and if you can show me where I did, I'll gladly apologize for it. Like your last post, it seems you are putting words in my mouth that simply were not said. Why would you do that...twice?

Lets just move on. You do your thing, Tom.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,641
Messages
2,199,884
Members
79,025
Latest member
Stanwa
Back
Top