dmoran said:
Catfur -
If you've never tried it, your input is total speculation. Which is fine and your right.....
My input is based on my understanding of the laws of physics, which may be imperfect, flawed or just plain wrong. A tuner affects the internal ballistics of a fired round (by changing the vibration moments of the barrel) by attempting to minimize the effect of barrel vibration on the direction of the bullet as it exits the muzzle. Once it leaves the muzzle, the laws of external ballistics apply, and what direction it left the barrel is unchanged regardless of the target distance. What physical process allows the change in barrel harmonics that a tuner provides to have a
different effect at 1000 yards than 100?
While you may experience better results personally by tuning at 1000 rather than 100, I would argue that it's exceedingly difficult to empirically prove that you are really getting better because the change in barrel harmonics, due to the fact that the effect of other factors beyond barrel harmonics (wind, SD, etc...) are magnified to a greater extent at 1000 than at 100. The effects of the barrel harmonics over any reasonable measurement are likely swamped out by the other factors.
There are so many factors that affect shot precision that I'd think you'd want to take as great pains as possible to isolate the factor you are measuring from other factors.
Maybe something else that you are doing when you tune at 1000 is actually what is providing the difference in results (who knows what that might be).
Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't know how. If I am wrong (and I've been wrong before and will be wrong again), I'd really like to know why I'm wrong and not just that I'm wrong.