Tucker video of Rittenhouse

[243Mendoza]

The Democrats/BLM are using criminals, that they released from jail on the pretext of Covid, to push their agendas by terrorizing citizens. This is the same tactics used by the Nazis in the 20's. Democrat congressmen and senators have threatened more violent protests if Trump is reelected: vote for a Harris administration and she will call back her attack dogs.

 

[243Mendoza]

I feel that he should come with suits against the networks that were slandering him.

Ray

Has this video been blocked?

 

[Mark W]

Has this video been blocked?

Yep, it sure looks that it. If you haven’t noticed lately freedom of speak only goes one way anymore.

 

[brokeasajoke]

There needs to be some enlightenment on who's rifle it was and why he was actually there. I've read different stories. Truth is he was being portrayed as firing into protesters by the media when the full video shoes much more (whether he was in the right or wrong).

 

[cotntop]

I totally agree with Ray. This progressive movement has been gaining speed since the late 60's. Man never got anywhere by being silent but an ass kicking. An older gent said to me that this country has a three party system, Right Wing, Left Wing and Chicken Wing. The writing is on the wall and only the ignorant will ignore.

 

[243Mendoza]

At 17 it was illegal for him to be in possession of that gun. It was also illegal for him to possess that gun in Mn. And it was illegal for him to be threatening, let alone shooting anyone, regardless of the circumstances. That's what's referred to as compounding a felony...

I've read that he was working at lot he was given the weapon by the owner of the car lot to protect his property.

Yep, it sure looks that it. If you haven’t noticed lately freedom of speak only goes one way anymore.

 

[Raythemanroe]

I've read that he was working at lot he was given the weapon by the owner of the car lot to protect his property.

What I have heard, he didn't cross state lines with the firearm and was legal.. I'm sorry some of us are trying to attach those that have the balls but I'm guessing this is why we are here in the first place..


Ray

 

[timeout]

Has this video been blocked?

You can still watch it here:
https://www.foxnews.com/media/kenosha-shooting-new-footage-kyle-rittenhouse-tucker

 

[INTJ]

At 17 it was illegal for him to be in possession of that gun. It was also illegal for him to possess that gun in Mn. And it was illegal for him to be threatening, let alone shooting anyone, regardless of the circumstances. That's what's referred to as compounding a felony.

He's just another dumb kid (remember, he does not possess a prefrontal cortex at that age, and can't perform higher thinking tasks) who was improperly indoctrinated by his parents. Not the first kid I've/we've seen like that. But his errors will cost him a good portion, perhaps all of his freedom for the rest of his life, AND MORE IMPORTANTLY his parents will lose everything to the civil lawsuits that follow, and maybe even their freedom. Perhaps that is a small bit of justice for the mind fuc* they gave him.

Killing someone is almost never the best course of action, and that is something that most thinking adults will agree upon. (Some may want to read that sentence again carefully before you start flaming).

This is a very regrettable situation. 5 lives have been, or will be permanently changed for the worse, and for no good reason. A senseless act of violence by an unthinking minor in possession of a weapon that he should never had his hands on without adult supervision, and leaving 2 people dead.

Driving over the speed limit is also illegal. At best, all the kid should be convicted of is "misdemeanor count of possession of a dangerous weapon under the age of 18."

He absolutely has the right to be there and defend himself. He was also unwise to be there.

 

[BP1]

The Democrats/BLM are using criminals, that they released from jail on the pretext of Covid, to push their agendas by terrorizing citizens. This is the same tactics used by the Nazis in the 20's. Democrat congressmen and senators have threatened more violent protests if Trump is reelected: vote for a Harris administration and she will call back her attack dogs.

True but when Trump is re-elected I’m sure he’s deal with theses peaceful protesters and a fashion they’re not gonna like..

 

[saunaking]

At 17 it was illegal for him to be in possession of that gun. It was also illegal for him to possess that gun in Mn. And it was illegal for him to be threatening, let alone shooting anyone, regardless of the circumstances. That's what's referred to as compounding a felony.

He's just another dumb kid (remember, he does not possess a prefrontal cortex at that age, and can't perform higher thinking tasks) who was improperly indoctrinated by his parents. Not the first kid I've/we've seen like that. But his errors will cost him a good portion, perhaps all of his freedom for the rest of his life, AND MORE IMPORTANTLY his parents will lose everything to the civil lawsuits that follow, and maybe even their freedom. Perhaps that is a small bit of justice for the mind fuc* they gave him.

Here is what the law reads in Wisconsin for someone under 18:Giving, loaning or selling a dangerous weapon to someone under 18 is a felony and carries a sentence of up to 3½ years in prison and a $10,000 fine unless the firearm is used for target practice or hunting. If that gun is used in a homicide or suicide, the person can be charged with a felony carrying up to six years in prison and a $10,000 fine. This reads for the person who gave, borrowed or sells the "dangerous weapon"; not the person who uses it. The rifle was borrowed to him and did not cross state lines.

Kyle worked as a life guard in Kenosha, even though he lives in Illinois. (BTW, Kenosha is in Wisconsin, not Minnesota). He spent the time after work that day removing graffiti from a school that the rioters had defaced the night before. He was there helping a group in the evening that were protecting downtown businesses. Should he have been there as a 17 year old kid that night? Probably not, but he had as much of a right to be there as any of the dirtbags that were rioting. If anything, he should be commended for showing the restraint he did when other rioters were coming after him. He never "threatened" anyone with the rifle, and only protected himself when attacked. I'm not sure most of us that have seen combat would have had as much restraint.