kanuck said:seymour fish said:9.8 gr
Could you be more specific.
rchouser said:memilanuk, great link. Noticed that the 300 Rum didn't make the list. I wonder if the case is just too big.
rchouser said:memilanuk, great link. Noticed that the 300 Rum didn't make the list. I wonder if the case is just too big.
all that page gave me was a 404 error from hodgons.Well, maybe you could as well. Otherwise, you asked an open-ended question, and got the same sort of answer.
What caliber are you interested in? What bullet weight? Supersonic, subsonic, etc.?
Have you seen this page?
A couple of links to the reduce loads powders.
https://www.hodgdon.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/h4895-reduced-rifle-loads.pdf
Yes I have data from hodgons for reduced loads for the 243 and most all are with h4895. I have never tried them though.Hodgdon is suggesting, by only publishing reduced loads for H4895, that there is something special about it for the purpose. But there's not. There are many powders suitable for reducing safely down to about 60% of max. One more obvious example is IMR 4895 which of course is very similar to the Hodgdon version. But there are many more, just look in the Richard Lee book, Chapter 10, the section on using the "1 Grain Factor" (page 112 in the Second Edition). Any powder that shows a value in the "1 Grain Factor Velocity " column for a particular bullet weight is suitable for reducing. The Lee algorithm allows you to iteratively calculate an estimate of the velocity after reducing the charge by a number of grains. I used the factor provided for IMR 4895 with a 130- gr bullet in 270 Win, and the result was reasonably close to my chronograph readings. I used it to load down from the max 2957 listed to 2500 fps.
-