I own and, for some situations/operations, use pneumatic assist via devices (have 3 f them, for use with the LEE CAST CLASSIC presses) made by Charlie Hood - the only operation where I let the pneumatic assist override 'tactility' is for core 'squirting'/forming; for this operation, the uniformity of pressure and speed produce much more uniform core weight.I will just add this...more a question than an answer, but here goes.
Most presses offer tremendous leverage which HAS to reduce what is felt in the handle, right? So, with today's technology in measuring pressures, by one means or another...wouldn't it make more sense to utilize better pressure measuring of today, deleting ALL leverage and just mounting a hydro or pneumatic cylinder to the ram, giving 1:1 pressure difference measurements...vs "feel" through all that leverage? Hand made has been the standard for a really long time, based on " feel" with a ton of leverage involved.
Regardless of diameter/weight, via a given core squirt/form die, the Hood air assisted Lee Classic Cast presses produce cores with an extreme weight range of < 0.1 Gr.- very similar to what one can expect with cores purchased from Charlie (Hood Custom Products). The SAME core form die, mounted on any of the RockChucker, Ammo Masters, or, B&A clones will produce an extreme range of 0.3 Gr., with the vast majority falling into a range of 0.2 Gr.


With full automation, we can control speed, pressure, and dwell . . . but, until AI takes over, and replaces humans entirely, automation cannot/does not incorporate 'TACTILE JUDGEMENT' - "that felt funny".

Using 'hillbilly' methodology, to provide some sense of pressure/force required to point [.30 Cal.] bullets, once in a while, I'll attach my "bow/archery-scale" to the 18" long handle (compound block-face to face of 2" diameter ball handle) on one of the Niemi converted AmmoMaster (RCBS) presses and 'weigh' a few point-up pulls. This measurement produces 73-75 pounds of peak force - this is how all of my thirty caliber 112 and 118 Gr. bullets are pointed - even at this peak force, the tactile feedback is quite valuable, and helps assure UNIFORMITY - some (most?) would be surprised at the accuracy of the judgement one developes to identify the 'stinkers'.
That said, in testing, a very high percentage of the 'stinkers' shoot quite well . . . but even yours truly won't use the 'funny feelers' in a registered tournament where I intend, against all odds, to win.


Last edited: