• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Those who sort primers by weight...

Gets even worse...

Just sorted 600 Federal 215M LR Match. the distribution was fairly even across .351-.360 mg.

I'm considering sorting those in +/-1mg batches. i.e. .351/.352/.353

With that sort of spread in each batch, (I would end up with a little over 3 batches) was it really worth the sorting time?

Would you sort more and try to shrink it down to 5 tighter batches i.e .357/.358, .359/.360?

This sorting gets old but the storms predicted for this weekend will make for some cabin fever.
I sort mine into a clear Plano fishing worm box, remove your outliers on each end, then shoot sequentially. No grouping necessary.
 
I sort mine into a clear Plano fishing worm box, remove your outliers on each end, then shoot sequentially. No grouping necessary.

Thanks. Interesting. I had not considered that.

I might do that in reverse order. Reducing the priming compound charge (all things else assumed equal) as the day warms up.
 
I shoot f- class club matches monthly. I sort my primers on my fx120i. I sort both BR2s and Ginex primers into batches of .02 gn. and put them back into the original trays. With sorted primers, and the correct powder (N555) both my 284 Shehane and my 7 PRCW normally give me SDs of 5 or below with no vertical flyers. I use the outliers for load development and sighters. Now if I could learn to read the wind and eliminate the horizontal flyers I could get really good.
Sorting primers isn’t for everyone, it is definitely a pain in the butt, absolutely unnecessary for hunting or normal shooting. However for long range competition where a match is won or lost by one point or an X or two I feel that it is worth the time.
 
Show me something to make me wrong. :) If the Short Range folks learn something they hide it under a bushel...
Pete, one example is the bullet making thread on here. Excellent exchange of info on one of the most important pieces of the accuracy puzzle.


Since you winter down South....tell us what you're testing in the off season. And the results.

Good shootin' :) -Al
 
Last edited:
Pete, one example is the bullet making thread on here. Excellent exchange of info on one of the most important pieces of the accuracy puzzle.


Since you winter down South....tell us what you're testing in the off season. And the results.

Good shootin' :) -Al
I know a lot more people are making their own bullets and I know that there are bullets and there are bullets. I'm pretty sure the vast majority of those individuals do not make their bullets available to the general public so whatever they learn isn't available to the general public. What use, to the shooting community, is one or a few shooters having a source for the ultimate bullet if they aren't generally available?


I'm 81 now and my time for testing and my mind will no longer allow me the ability to do much where memory is required. I appreciate what you do and thank you for putting in the time and money to do it.
Do you sell bullets?

Keep pullin them handles :)

Pete
 
Last edited:
I know I did this s couple years ago and posted it, not that anything matters besides your targets but....

20260123_175408_copy_567x1008.jpg

^^^^small sample of some 205s i sorted, with the 2 extremes set out and circled.
20260123_175513_copy_567x1008.jpg
20260123_180649_copy_567x1008.jpg
^^^^dissolving out the go juice (yellow)

Tom
 
I have started sorting my primers by weight. CCI 450s.
Have found 5 to 10 fps velocity change between the different weight sortings.
Was somewhat surprised with the overall uniformity with the CCI 450s.
Has improved my ES and SD, but still struggling with wind.
 
View attachment 1734882drying^^^

View attachment 1734884^^^^^result less the go juice^^^^

For what it's worth on a cold weekend that I need to make some bullets rather than shoot!

Tom
Just thinking about all the threads on primers. I really liked the pix of primers going off in the dark showing the volume difference in flame and sparks.

  • If a primer has a heavier charge, it’s the same as more powder.
  • The primer charge variation affects how the flame and heat penetrate the powder column and its rate of burning,
 
Took me about 1hr. to sort 300 for SWN
-All weights in grams-
70- .336/.341, for 3x20+ at 600 (-Outliers)
30- .348/.350, for. “ “ (+Outliers)
200- .342/.347, for Fri/Sat/Sun(Median group)
300 Total
No string fire of 15/20+ will have more than a .003g weight spread.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9647.jpeg
    IMG_9647.jpeg
    944.3 KB · Views: 18
Took me about 1hr. to sort 300 for SWN
-All weights in grams-
70- .336/.341, for 3x20+ at 600 (-Outliers)
30- .348/.350, for. “ “ (+Outliers)
200- .342/.347, for Fri/Sat/Sun(Median group)
300 Total
No string fire of 15/20+ will have more than a .003g weight spread.

.003 spread sounds reasonable.
 
Okay, I've said this many times on this forum. In fact almost every time sorting primers has been mentioned.
"I will quit shooting before I weigh primers!".
Well, after being locked down by chemo treatments, poor weather and may other boredom causing reasons I decided to see just what this primer sorting biz is about. It was quite surprising what I found.
I set a digital scale that can measure 3 places down to .001 to grams and been weigh sorting a fresh box to CCI400 primers. I sorted them in a preset (in my mind) parameter of .01 spreads. As I went through them I came upon one primer that was WAY heavier than the other 999 and a few that were quite a bit lighter. It was tedious but broke the boredom. Later, in another boredom stupor, I decided to weigh a fresh brick of CCI450. That's when I found out these kind of fell in the same range of variance as the CCI400 and (as suspected) they were a bit heavier than the 400's. During the first 100 pack it dawned on me that the one prime mentioned above in that brick of 400's was in the weigh range of these 450's.
I'm not ready, in spite of that lone incident, to say sorting is the panacea but I'll come back with some results when things are nicer and weather makes for more hospitable test sessions.
 
After getting the new FX scale, and being bored, I weighed 200. CCI 450 primers. Would have to go to loading room, however I was pleased to find the consistency. Don't know if I would bother weighing again.

Weighed a few CCI 400. considerable lighter & weights fluctuating.

To all a good night.
 
So, even with sorted primers, shouldnt the chrono numbers share similar numbers except the fps ?
It's those primers weight at each end of the bell curve when fired together that'll result in a measurable ES. Primers at one end bell curve used with those grouped right nest to them aren't going to show anything but a decent SD.
 
weighing primers and sorting your brass by case volume capacity will lower your ES/SD #'s for sure, sort your bullets, trim and point them and it might shrink your groups at 600 and 1K......but who wants to do that nonsense :)
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,812
Messages
2,263,801
Members
81,586
Latest member
Hollywood Gun Shop
Back
Top