Busdriver said:You're going to make hundreds of viable challengers in our sport... With all the secrets out, it's going to be hard to keep ahead of the pack.
DO IT!!!
Nando-AS said:Erik,
It sounds like a good idea, and I will watch them.
I have learned how to do a multitude of things, from programming in C^ to replacing the trigger on a Scar 17s, by watching You Tube videos. I have also learned that there are a lot of You Tube How-To video ‘producers’ that do not really know what they claim they know.
Also, even when the information is, or appears to be reliable, the video is useless because the camera is not properly focused or trained on the actual subject being discussed. Other times, the protagonist stands between the camera and the subject of the video, and thus totally renders the video useless.
I am confident that your videos will be first class, definitely reliable, and very helpful.
A hint, if I may.
When titling your videos, it may be a good idea to end the title with a number, as a suffix; and at the end of each video, mention that there may be an update or a follow-up to the video just watched – even if you don’t anticipate a follow up. Numbering the titles and hinting at a possible sequel will allow you to supplement the information you have provided and hopefully your audience will watch the latest and greatest.
It would be possible that after publishing a video you may realize that you omitted something, or perhaps you will have done further work on the subject at a later date. In either case, you can create the follow-up video, give it the same title as the original, but with proper sequence number as the suffix to the title, and your fans will be sure to find it more easily.
Good Luck!
Nando
Erik Cortina said:Nando-AS said:Erik,
It sounds like a good idea, and I will watch them.
I have learned how to do a multitude of things, from programming in C^ to replacing the trigger on a Scar 17s, by watching You Tube videos. I have also learned that there are a lot of You Tube How-To video ‘producers’ that do not really know what they claim they know.
Also, even when the information is, or appears to be reliable, the video is useless because the camera is not properly focused or trained on the actual subject being discussed. Other times, the protagonist stands between the camera and the subject of the video, and thus totally renders the video useless.
I am confident that your videos will be first class, definitely reliable, and very helpful.
A hint, if I may.
When titling your videos, it may be a good idea to end the title with a number, as a suffix; and at the end of each video, mention that there may be an update or a follow-up to the video just watched – even if you don’t anticipate a follow up. Numbering the titles and hinting at a possible sequel will allow you to supplement the information you have provided and hopefully your audience will watch the latest and greatest.
It would be possible that after publishing a video you may realize that you omitted something, or perhaps you will have done further work on the subject at a later date. In either case, you can create the follow-up video, give it the same title as the original, but with proper sequence number as the suffix to the title, and your fans will be sure to find it more easily.
Good Luck!
Nando
I was actually thinking about simply naming them something like:
"Precision reloading tips #1: Making a dummy round"
"Precision reloading tips #2: Measuring to the lands"
"Precision reloading tips #3: Neck turning Part 1"
"Precision reloading tips #3: Neck turning Part 2"
"Precision reloading tips #3: Neck turning Part 3"
"Precision reloading tips #4: Primer pocket uniforming"
Or:
"Precision reloading tips #1: Making a dummy round"
"Precision reloading tips #2: Measuring to the lands"
"Precision reloading tips #3: Neck turning Part 1"
"Precision reloading tips #4: Neck turning Part 2"
"Precision reloading tips #5: Neck turning Part 3"
"Precision reloading tips #6: Primer pocket uniforming"
Which format do you guys thing it would be best to name the videos?
Erik Cortina said:Another idea I have is to do actual testing on things we do such as brass weight sorting, bullet sorting, meplat trimming, pointing, etc and shoot them side by side at 1,000 yards to verify results.
What do you guys think?