Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dusty, the current trends have been to err on the side of more clearance rather than not enough.I think yall may soon learn it doesnt take as much neck clearance as you thought too.
I only measured a couple this morning from my gold box and they varied as much as .0006-.0008 in thickness measuring around the neck. They are not concentric from the ID to the OD.Dusty, the current trends have been to err on the side of more clearance rather than not enough.
Years ago, I strived to keep the clearance at just about .001. This was because I fell for all of that stuff that came out of the Houston Warehouse. I was even reading ehere shooters turned their necks, fired them, then turned them again in a effort to get that clearance just right.
Later, I found out it was better, especially when shooting in the upper load window, to get more generous. Now I shoot for .002 over the loaded round.
The problem with this latest brass is it is darned near “zero” With a flat base bullet.
After talking to you last night, I decided to sit down and check a bunch of this new stuff for variations in the wall thickness. They are not that great. Some are as thin as .014 on one spot, and as much as .015 in another spot. I machined a mandrel in my lathe, and pushed several up onto it to check them with my “tenth” indicator. Sure enough, all exhibited between .0006 and .001 runout.
Maybe some of those guys that got laid off at Remington during the bankruptcy went to work for Lapua.![]()
I did exactly the same thing with a few new 220R cases this morning using my Mit .0001 indicator. They were closer to .015 than not on the ones I checked. I didn't check them all around but should've.Dusty, the current trends have been to err on the side of more clearance rather than not enough.
Years ago, I strived to keep the clearance at just about .001. This was because I fell for all of that stuff that came out of the Houston Warehouse. I was even reading ehere shooters turned their necks, fired them, then turned them again in a effort to get that clearance just right.
Later, I found out it was better, especially when shooting in the upper load window, to get more generous. Now I shoot for .002 over the loaded round.
The problem with this latest brass is it is darned near “zero” With a flat base bullet.
After talking to you last night, I decided to sit down and check a bunch of this new stuff for variations in the wall thickness. They are not that great. Some are as thin as .014 on one spot, and as much as .015 in another spot. I machined a mandrel in my lathe, and pushed several up onto it to check them with my “tenth” indicator. Sure enough, all exhibited between .0006 and .001 runout.
Maybe some of those guys that got laid off at Remington during the bankruptcy went to work for Lapua.![]()
All I know is if I went to a no turn neck, the same thing would happen to me. Good luck Jackie.
Seems like my old necks were .017 maybe? Blue box from many years ago.
I have no problem with using this brass in a match.Even my no turn chamberings get turned twice just for this reason. Out of the box brass is not suitable for match use no matter what chambering. Neck turning with my motor and 21st century neck turner is not ever an issue for me
Are those 4 different pieces or the same ones rotated?Okay here is 2 pieces of brass that I necked up to 6mm, showing what it started at and ended up being. So yes we are off .001 to .0015 to large.
Two 220r then necked up to 6mm, went from .015 to .0145 #1 and from .0145 to .0140 #2Are those 4 different pieces or the same ones rotated?
That brings up another probably irrelevant point: The un-turned neck walls taper continuously to the case mouth. So thickness where everyone seems to position their ball mic (mid-neck) would be thicker than at the case mouth, and thinner than near the shoulder junction. I use a stop on my ball mic to regulate the ball's position below the mouth. To compare my neck walls with someone else's on the forum, we'd both need to both sample at the same depth, wouldn't we?After talking to you last night, I decided to sit down and check a bunch of this new stuff for variations in the wall thickness. They are not that great. Some are as thin as .014 on one spot, and as much as .015 in another spot.
I’m glad you stated this. At times it’s preached on this forum that if your bullet won’t fall “like rattling down a chimney pipe” into your fired case neck, your going to have accuracy issues and fliers. I think there are always exceptions to that rule.I think yall may soon learn it doesnt take as much neck clearance as you thought too.
Al, when we shoot our regular turned neck cases, the wall thickness stays uniform Through numerous firings.Jackie, I'm curious what the neck thickness would measure after you chambered and fired a couple. -Al
I think most factory brass does.Jackie, the reason I mention it is that the Lapua cases I have here have a definite 'funnel' shape to the inside by pin guage.