• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Thermal binos for hunting, what’s your opinion…

I, like most of you think that for big game hunting to locate animals to hunt is like cheating the animal and the sport.

I do carry a thermal handheld with me however, while hunting. It has come in handy in locating downed animals that decide to die in heavy brush. Sometimes it involves climbing a tree to see into the thick stuff.

I located deer for a young fellow once, that expired in a river and was mostly submerged and jammed in a log jam.
Without the thermal we would never have found it. So, it has it uses for recovery.
 
Now that this question has been raised - I now have to ask how using thermal binos for location is that much different than a network of trail cams with low light sensitive cameras, IR LED illumination, and a Wifi connection? I would bet that a large number of hunters who are against thermal imaging for locating big game still use tech like this which to some degree also allows stacking the deck against game.

I have no skin in this game as the little bit of hunting that I do has nothing to do with trophies and is primarily focused on random undesirable pest varmints.

I think it is inevitable that the technology utilized will be continually pushed to the limit of the law. Even primitive seasons such as muzzleloader have been affected. Just look at smokepoles that are pushing 2600 fps.
 
I struggle with this. One of my pet peeves that sets me off is baiting. Flame me if you like, it's your prerogative. If it's legal in your area, you're not breaking the rules. If it's not, and you are, you are no better than any run of the mill poacher. Would I bait if I could? No, but that's my personal viewpoint. Others will and will not agree.

Since the dawn of time, hunting has advanced in methods and equipment. Todays hunters have monumental advantages over hunters of the past. The questions is, where does each individual hunter draw the line as to how far they want to go to take advantage of those advancements. One hunter can say "I bait while you use scent lures, grunt calls, etc. What makes what I'm doing any less "sportsmanlike" than you?" There is no easy answer.

I have a thermal scope I use only for recovery, when necessary. I don't scout for targets with it. Could I? Legally, sure. Do I want to? No, but that's my personal reasoning. Some say trail cams are a huge disadvantage, to the prey. I can tell you from experience (this year especially) that a deer on a trail cam DOES NOT equal one in the freezer. If I took every 8 point+ buck I saw on a cam this year, I'd have to build an addition for all the trophies and build a commercial room sized freezer. I never drew my bow, nor raised my gun this year.

What I do believe is that if your locality has rules, ALL participating should follow them. Anyone who is not has the advantage to take, and even lure, deer that they would not have normally harvested. As methods and technologies advance, the rules and laws will need to evolve with them, but who's to say of those laws infringe upon the concept of fair chase?

I think the answer lies in what you want to take away from the hunting experience. I always look upon tech advances and think to myself "what would I do if there were no batteries, cell phones, or powered equipment involved? Could I be an effective hunter if I had to go without those advantages?
 
Again, thanks for the input. Let me tell you about brothers elk hunt, not a big deal but it illustrates a point. He drew a late bull tag, we went to where we always go. It’s a meat, occasionally we will shoot a bull over 350 but the majority of the bulls we tag in that area on the late hunt are spikes and rag horns. My brother went to one ridge, I started on a ridge that parrelled his ridge. Usually when we walk those two ridges out some action happens. It’s canyon country and you can see for a 1000 yards in some areas, other areas are thick. I had my daughter with me, it was her tag. I heard his truck turn off and gave him a 10 minute head start, we were still using headlamps. As legal light came two shots rang out, I had them pegged in his location. I figured he got lucky and was done. Me and my daughter started our walk, about two hours into our walk a side by side came down to the end of the ridge we were walking. They parked and I could tell they were recovering an elk. We looped around them and head back to our side by side since they were talking and laughing, I knew that area was done for the morning.

When we got back to our side by side my brother was there, no blood. I asked if that was him. No, he said as he was walking up to the point we glass off and two guys were already there, as soon as he noticed them they shot, twice. They never saw him. It was at exactly legal time. Ok, that’s no big deal it happens. A couple hours later they came out with a nice bull, maybe 340. They had it propped up so it was easy to see. They wanted to chat, young guys, excited. I talked to them, I like it when I see young people have success, anyone for that matter. They told me exactly what happened, they were sitting the point an hour early, in the dark. They were using thermal binos and had two bulls spotted, they waited for legal light and made the shot on the bigger of the two bulls. It was a long shot but they knew how to shoot. They didn’t hide the fact they were using thermals, they are legal, no reason to hide the fact. I should clarify thermal binos are legal, thermal optics/scopes are not. They did nothing wrong. That was my first encounter with this thermal big game hunting. I believe I’m correct in the legality statement but I’m not sure, I don’t use them so I never have cared.

Fast forward to our New Mexico deer hunt. We were hunting with a friend who operates a guide service. As we sat one day eating lunch way back in a hell hole I told him the elk story. He said I was about 2 years behind the curve, that just about every big game guide he knew are using them and that they were taking some big elk and deer. We talked quite a bit, he refuses to use them but he also added that he might reconsider because the competition is having a lot of success. He has had multiple big bulls he had scouted taken out using thermal binos in big country.

After that I started paying some attention and asked a couple more friends who work for some big name guides during the fall. They confirmed that they were using them a lot but that they try and keep it quiet so the game and fish doesn’t outlaw them. Since then we had a Coues deer hunt and another guide was way back in horses hunting an area we were hunting, they were on the same out cropping three days in a row, they obviously had something worth the pursuit and they were hunting it hard. No thermals, just the typical Swarovski 15x and a couple big eye set ups. Nice guys, hunting fools and they’ve taken some monster Coues deer. I like and respect that.

Ever since coming home I’ve debated the subject internally. My own feelings are like many of yours, I don’t like it. However, even if they were to outlaw thermals for this use on big game many of these guides would keep using them because of the nature of the business, some would cease I’m sure. Arizona outlawed game cameras a couple years ago, mostly because the guides in the strip area were putting out a lot of cameras, every cattle pond/ tank up there had 20-30 cameras on it. Even though the state outlawed them I know of one big game guide who refuses to pull them and his legal time is ready for a challenge.

One of the fun things about Coues deer is the challenge of spotting them, they are nick named the grey ghost and for good reason. They can simply disappear, anybody who’s hunted them knows this. Use a thermal and you’ll change the “grey ghost” into Rudolph and something about that just seems wrong. I’m not sure what the answer is but I hope this trend dies and comes under scrutiny, it just seems like cheating to me. Sit down scan a canyon or ridge in minutes and move to the next, I don’t like it.

All that being said I highly support thermal optics both scopes and scanners to hunt coyotes, pigs and recover dead or wounded animals. That makes sense.

I have no idea how they would regulate this issue, I’m not sure they can without outlawing thermals in your possession and I dont like that either. Heaven knows we are over regulated as it is. That’s my two cents. I’m sure this topic will be debated heavily in the near future.
 
Last edited:
I think there's a big difference between a trail cam and thermals. When you build a network of trail cams on a mobile network across multiple properties, then you're approaching the use of a thermal optic as described in the original post, and I'm really not a fan of it. This becomes even more true when its done by an outfitter in order to put a client on a "Target Buck". Trying to decided which one of your 5 stands on the property to hunt without applying significant hunting pressure to each of the areas is one thing. Maximizing the amount of $$ you can charge somebody to kill a wild animal is a different story. If I the state won't let me take my legally harvested deer, turn it into snack sticks, jerky, and summer sausage and sell it, then they should also have stringent regulation on how/what outfitters do to make money off of the same wild game.

I don't usually get into the baiting discussion because its illegal here. I suspect that the deer get accustomed to the practice so it doesn't make a huge difference one way or another. I can see where it would be beneficial for a putting meat in the freezer, especially with archery equipment where you need to be reasonably close. I've yet to see a big mature buck be motivated by food of any kind during November or December though. Even the big does are quick to catch on to areas that get a lot of human traffic, and will quickly change their routines to avoid perceived danger during the rut. Its always frustrating to go out and hunt a honey hole for the first time during the rut just to have a big doe circle you until she's down wind and then bust you only to find out that somebody's uncle had been in the stand earlier in the season.... Not that it has ever happened to me...

I'm fine with thermals and drones for recovering downed animals. Once the animal has been wounded, I'm good with ALMOST anything that can increase the odds of recovery. I also have no issues with using thermals when the goal is population control. I don't think any hog or coyote hunter is terribly concerned with stuff like that, and I totally get it. Bottom line is that there aren't many business out there making a lot of money by offering coyote hunts. Realistically, any time you can hunt something at night, I'm probably going to be okay with the use of thermal and/or NV. It only makes sense to do as much as you can to accurately identify what you're shooting at. I'm of a similar opinion in regards to other technology. I'm okay with almost anything that can be done to improve the accuracy and lethality of the hunter in the name of reducing the number of wounded animals that are not retrieved. The problem comes when those advancements are then used by hunters to significantly increase their perceived range only to end up wounding and loosing just as many animals. That's an ethics (and safety) issue for the hunter though.

At the end of the day if the state wants the size of the herd reduced, they pretty much have to either allow more hunting options and/or more tech to be used. Once they allow it, it's hard to shut that switch back off again.
 
I think there's a big difference between a trail cam and thermals. When you build a network of trail cams on a mobile network across multiple properties, then you're approaching the use of a thermal optic as described in the original post, and I'm really not a fan of it. This becomes even more true when its done by an outfitter in order to put a client on a "Target Buck". Trying to decided which one of your 5 stands on the property to hunt without applying significant hunting pressure to each of the areas is one thing. Maximizing the amount of $$ you can charge somebody to kill a wild animal is a different story. If I the state won't let me take my legally harvested deer, turn it into snack sticks, jerky, and summer sausage and sell it, then they should also have stringent regulation on how/what outfitters do to make money off of the same wild game.

I don't usually get into the baiting discussion because its illegal here. I suspect that the deer get accustomed to the practice so it doesn't make a huge difference one way or another. I can see where it would be beneficial for a putting meat in the freezer, especially with archery equipment where you need to be reasonably close. I've yet to see a big mature buck be motivated by food of any kind during November or December though. Even the big does are quick to catch on to areas that get a lot of human traffic, and will quickly change their routines to avoid perceived danger during the rut. Its always frustrating to go out and hunt a honey hole for the first time during the rut just to have a big doe circle you until she's down wind and then bust you only to find out that somebody's uncle had been in the stand earlier in the season.... Not that it has ever happened to me...

I'm fine with thermals and drones for recovering downed animals. Once the animal has been wounded, I'm good with ALMOST anything that can increase the odds of recovery. I also have no issues with using thermals when the goal is population control. I don't think any hog or coyote hunter is terribly concerned with stuff like that, and I totally get it. Bottom line is that there aren't many business out there making a lot of money by offering coyote hunts. Realistically, any time you can hunt something at night, I'm probably going to be okay with the use of thermal and/or NV. It only makes sense to do as much as you can to accurately identify what you're shooting at. I'm of a similar opinion in regards to other technology. I'm okay with almost anything that can be done to improve the accuracy and lethality of the hunter in the name of reducing the number of wounded animals that are not retrieved. The problem comes when those advancements are then used by hunters to significantly increase their perceived range only to end up wounding and loosing just as many animals. That's an ethics (and safety) issue for the hunter though.

At the end of the day if the state wants the size of the herd reduced, they pretty much have to either allow more hunting options and/or more tech to be used. Once they allow it, it's hard to shut that switch back off again.
In SD if the state would want to decrease the deer herd they just have to increase the number of deer permits, they are hard to draw in a lot of units.
The thermal issue with outfitters is a bad idea, they could just as well have them in a corral. The poor basterd that can't afford the thermals is at a huge disadvantage,
Not to mention the ops statement of the outfitters with a crew of people scouting.
 
Again, thanks for the input. Let me tell you about brothers elk hunt, not a big deal but it illustrates a point. He drew a late bull tag, we went to where we always go. It’s a meat, occasionally we will shoot a bull over 350 but the majority of the bulls we tag in that area on the late hunt are spikes and rag horns. My brother went to one ridge, I started on a ridge that parrelled his ridge. Usually when we walk those two ridges out some action happens. It’s canyon country and you can see for a 1000 yards in some areas, other areas are thick. I had my daughter with me, it was her tag. I heard his truck turn off and gave him a 10 minute head start, we were still using headlamps. As legal light came two shots rang out, I had them pegged in his location. I figured he got lucky and was done. Me and my daughter started our walk, about two hours into our walk a side by side came down to the end of the ridge we were walking. They parked and I could tell they were recovering an elk. We looped around them and head back to our side by side since they were talking and laughing, I knew that area was done for the morning.

When we got back to our side by side my brother was there, no blood. I asked if that was him. No, he said as he was walking up to the point we glass off and two guys were already there, as soon as he noticed them they shot, twice. They never saw him. It was at exactly legal time. Ok, that’s no big deal it happens. A couple hours later they came out with a nice bull, maybe 340. They had it propped up so it was easy to see. They wanted to chat, young guys, excited. I talked to them, I like it when I see young people have success, anyone for that matter. They told me exactly what happened, they were sitting the point an hour early, in the dark. They were using thermal binos and had two bulls spotted, they waited for legal light and made the shot on the bigger of the two bulls. It was a long shot but they knew how to shoot. They didn’t hide the fact they were using thermals, they are legal, no reason to hide the fact. I should clarify thermal binos are legal, thermal optics/scopes are not. They did nothing wrong. That was my first encounter with this thermal big game hunting. I believe I’m correct in the legality statement but I’m not sure, I don’t use them so I never have cared.

Fast forward to our New Mexico deer hunt. We were hunting with a friend who operates a guide service. As we sat one day eating lunch way back in a hell hole I told him the elk story. He said I was about 2 years behind the curve, that just about every big game guide he knew are using them and that they were taking some big elk and deer. We talked quite a bit, he refuses to use them but he also added that he might reconsider because the competition is having a lot of success. He has had multiple big bulls he had scouted taken out using thermal binos in big country.

After that I started paying some attention and asked a couple more friends who work for some big name guides during the fall. They confirmed that they were using them a lot but that they try and keep it quiet so the game and fish doesn’t outlaw them. Since then we had a Coues deer hunt and another guide was way back in horses hunting an area we were hunting, they were on the same out cropping three days in a row, they obviously had something worth the pursuit and they were hunting it hard. No thermals, just the typical Swarovski 15x and a couple big eye set ups. Nice guys, hunting fools and they’ve taken some monster Coues deer. I like and respect that.

Ever since coming home I’ve debated the subject internally. My own feelings are like many of yours, I don’t like it. However, even if they were to outlaw thermals for this use on big game many of these guides would keep using them because of the nature of the business, some would cease I’m sure. Arizona outlawed game cameras a couple years ago, mostly because the guides in the strip area were putting out a lot of cameras, every cattle pond/ tank up there had 20-30 cameras on it. Even though the state outlawed them I know of one big game guide who refuses to pull them and his legal time is ready for a challenge.

One of the fun things about Coues deer is the challenge of spotting them, they are nick named the grey ghost and for good reason. They can simply disappear, anybody who’s hunted them knows this. Use a thermal and you’ll change the “grey ghost” into Rudolph and something about that just seems wrong. I’m not sure what the answer is but I hope this trend dies and comes under scrutiny, it just seems like cheating to me. Sit down scan a canyon or ridge in minutes and move to the next, I don’t like it.

All that being said I highly support thermal optics both scopes and scanners to hunt coyotes, pigs and recover dead or wounded animals. That makes sense.

I have no idea how they would regulate this issue, I’m not sure they can without outlawing thermals in your possession and I dont like that either. Heaven knows we are over regulated as it is. That’s my two cents. I’m sure this topic will be debated heavily in the near future.
like we all know- money talks and follow the $—. these thermal bino methods you describe for big game hunts are not fair chase to me. that is not the experience I want on a big game hunt. I dont know if the trend can be reversed but id say the chances are low.
using thermals for coyotes /varmints anytime is okay to me though. i saw a young guy- german engineer working here in the states at the range i go to this past year. he said he was going guided black bear hunting in the west. i was thinking - i know places i could shoot one out the back door alot closer than that but anyway he had all swaro optics
bino-spotter- scope and it all operated together likes been said here - ranges the animal and tells you how to aim. not the experience i want either. even target shooting which i do quite a bit of- if all i have to do is push a button and the system finds the target- calculates the shot and fires the gun - im not gonna do that either. Im just Old School but i know we cant stop what the call progress.

Oh the German guy off coarse was driving a Beemer to
 
One thing I know is true (for myself). Before trail cams bowhunting was more fun. I imagined one of those 170" bucks walking by....I admit I have most of the high tech toys. I am more efficient now, maybe. I like load development and shooting almost as much as hunting.

Back in 1980 I got a M70 in 243 with a Weaver scope. Sometimes I miss those days....
 
Off topic, but now I wonder how much game poaching goes on here in Texas with these thermals.
This says thermals are legal in Texas with no restrictions. Early 2023 so may not be current.
 
This says thermals are legal in Texas with no restrictions. Early 2023 so may not be current.
I meant people using them to poach game at night. Very illegal .
 
Scanning a canyon, drainage, ridge, woodlot, etc.. and instantly knowing if there is any animals there... Well, it sure takes the "woodsmanship" out of hunting, in my opinion. For me, like Jrsolocam mentioned, the not knowing is fun.
 
While the technology is impressive, IMHO using thermals to hunt big game gives a hunter and/or a guide an unnatural advantage that makes a mockery of the ideal of fair chase. Great for controlling predator or invasive/destructive populations, but too much for big game. A modern take on spot lighting. I feel the same about scouting with drones.

FWIW,

MQ1
 
I wouldn't think that regulation would be all that difficult. You can't have thermals while carrying a legal hunting firearm in the group. Make the fines and penalties stiff, like 7 figures stiff, and confiscate everything from everyone when a violation is found. As far as an outfitter using game cams that are outlawed, I'd report them and let them learn just how much authority the state has. That prosecutor gets paid every day, so he might as well be getting paid to bankrupt some pos poacher.
 
So with thermals I'd be able to look into the steep thick heavy covered canyons and draws of western Oregon without ever stepping foot in them?
Yeah, NO!!
It's definitely an unfair advantage given to the hunter, taking the "HUNT" out of the equation.
Finally something myself and ODFW are in agreement with.
 
So with thermals I'd be able to look into the steep thick heavy covered canyons and draws of western Oregon without ever stepping foot in them?
Yeah, NO!!
It's definitely an unfair advantage given to the hunter, taking the "HUNT" out of the equation.
Finally something myself and ODFW are in agreement with.
So how do you stop a nature lover not hunting scouting for you? He goes out, no hunting license, no gun. Pans the area with a thermal and later let's his hunting buddy know? Even if laws are put in.place you can't violate another person's rights. This has been going on in bass fishing since the advent of pro tournaments. Locals will prefish and hole(stock fish) in an area. Then they will give a Pro inside info. In this case there is.money involved. I'm not necessarily for or against. Bottom line even with state laws.....it won't prevent this. Wait for thermal drones if they aren't here already. How far will a thermal reach? What distance?
 
So how do you stop a nature lover not hunting scouting for you? He goes out, no hunting license, no gun. Pans the area with a thermal and later let's his hunting buddy know? Even if laws are put in.place you can't violate another person's rights. This has been going on in bass fishing since the advent of pro tournaments. Locals will prefish and hole(stock fish) in an area. Then they will give a Pro inside info. In this case there is.money involved. I'm not necessarily for or against. Bottom line even with state laws.....it won't prevent this. Wait for thermal drones if they aren't here already. How far will a thermal reach? What distance?
Mike I get what your saying, you can't stop folks from trying to circumvent the laws and regulations for thier personal satisfaction.
December of 24 OSP raided a poacher who had been using thermals up out of the Portland area.
Looking at the table of seized antlers and firearms was laughable yet angered me.
Nothing was trophy class, it was just killing to be killing and not hunting.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,254
Messages
2,192,250
Members
78,784
Latest member
Vyrinn
Back
Top