• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

The OCD Load Development Theory

Having read several posts about load optimization theories, I would like to post my own. You all know about OBT (Optimal Barrel Time) and OCW (Optimal Charge Weight). My theory is called OCD (Obsessive Compulsive Disorder). It involves endless fussing over the smallest details of cartridge construction and dimensions and interminable load tests (Audette ladders, Baney ladders, Aluminum ladders (both step and extension) and, the ultimate; Round Robin, Third Party, Double Blind, Mechanical Rest, Tunnel Tests). OCD may not actually result in a single round fired in competition or afield, but provides the satisfaction of knowing that no detail, however insignificant, is overlooked. Using OCD techniques, it is possible to find the ultimate load for a rifle easily within 2 or 3 barrels, 4 tops. [br]
Another important aspect of OCD is the collection and detailed knowledge of every handloading gadget, fixture, gauge, press or other device known to humankind. The more obscure, both origin and purpose, the better. Proper OCD use of these tools can winnow a full production run of brass to a set of 5 cases that are completely indistinguishable from each other. A new breakthrough area is the emerging use of scanning, tunneling electron microscopy to sort brass on the sub-atomic level, eliminating molecular variances demonstrated to produce flyers. Less powerful optical microscopes are useful when sorting powder into kernel groups. I corresponded with a well-known (in the OCD community) powder-sorter and learned a great deal of useful information that I plan to apply in my next load series. We all wish him well and hope for an early release from the state facility. He had a few problems that needed attention after sorting an 80-pound lot of H335. Dynamic bullet-spinning fixtures help us to sort bullets based on true gyroscopic data gathered at rotational rates equal to those experienced during firing. One of these devices recently became unstable and sheared 12 grade 8, 1/2" mounting bolts. When the fixture stopped bouncing around the shop forty-five minutes later, we were able to determine that a few thousandths of bullet jacket separated during testing, catastrophically destabilizing it. If we had not caught it, that flawed bullet might actually have been fired, ruining the group. Group measurement is another important area that separates OCD from less exact systems. All groups are fired with a 1000x telescope that allows use of a sewing needle point as aiming reference. Triply-redundant Laser interferometers provide group measurement precision to 200 nanometers, eliminating most ties. [br]
OCD is a dedicated discipline and not for everyone. While it does not need to be fully applied in all aspects to have beneficial results, one cannot call oneself truly OCD until there are no more details to examine. Thankfully, we have not yet reached that point and the quest continues!
 
Kinda sounds like when I wrote a letter to Shooting Times editor about being proud of the family jewels, namely a pile of fresh reloaded beautiful pieces of ammo.
 
regretfuly,this all sounds similar to the thoughts that go thru my mind sometimes.....although, not as extensive!
I feel that so many people probably do the same, instead of keeping it simple,I would like to say i keep it simple, but have had many long winded debates with friends about some of the most outlandish possible causes of in-accuracy.....
Pretty funny post....enjoyed it!
 
A buddy of mine told me when I first got in to shooting if most people spent as much time shooting as they do load testing their groups would get smaller.
Bob
 
Finally a person I can relate to. However I think you are plowing some old ground here. First "Scanning Tunneling Electron Microscopy" (STEM as it is commonly called) is not new. There was three chapters on this subject in the 1997 book titled "1,739 Easy Steps to Preparing your Brass for Reloading" so I would not agree that it is new. I'm willing to concede that it might have been a breakthrough- if by breakthrough you mean it allowed us for the first time to shoot 20 shot 100 yard groups that when measured with our Interferometers - were less than the diameter of the bullet we were shooting. But if you recall a negative minute of angle at 100 meant that at 500 even our most powerful Interferometers (I noticed your only using a Triple) had a difficult time measuring the groups and at 1000 the groups were so small it appeared the target was untouched.


Second thing is I believe we have advanced the ball as far as we can by Powder Sorting single base powders. A friend of mine ,one of the first PS'rs (Powder Sorters), is now experimenting with Powder Blending. That is where you first powder sort two different powders then you blend the two sorted powders together and you then sort the blend powder and use that for your loads. My friend advises that you should only shoot BP (Blended Powder) loads in rifles that have no-turn barrels (ie. where the barrel bore diameter is at least .50000011 larger than the cartridge diameter). If you do not know if your rifle has a no-turn barrel take it to a Gunsmith however many Smith may not the tools necessary to make the measurement so they may need to send to someone who has.

Regarding the problem you had with your DBSF - I think you need to read the instructions more carefuly when you get a new tool. I own three DBSFs all purchased from high quality Companies so I think I know what I am talking about here. The instructions (at least my instructions) are clear in that the fixture is to be "WELDED" to the base - the Grade 8 bolts are "NOT" to be use as the primary means to attach the fixture to the base - they are simply a safety backup in case a weld were to fail.

I noticed you did not mention what dies you are using to reform your prefired bullets. I am thinking about getting into reforming prefireds. I have an opportunity to buy 30,000 previously fired .224 120Gr. Match Grade Hollow Based Boat Pointed VLDs for about one half the price of new bullets so any advice or insight on reforming prefireds would be appreciated.

Enjoyed your post - A kindred Spirit
Taxman
 
Steve,
Just read your post.
When I was about 18 years old, which was a hell of a long time ago, I bought a Lee Loader for my Remmy 700 22-250. I purchased whatever powder was listed in the used Hornady manual I found at an old bookstore and that I could also find in stock at the local K-mart/reloading center along with a few primers. I read the instructions and started loading ammo. No attention to case length, primer pocket, COAL or anything else that I can recall. I weighed my charges on an old balance scale that was quite used when I got it and seated my bullets to the same length as the factory rounds. When I had shot those rounds up, I repeated the process again. As we all know, as the years pass, recall of what actually happened versus your memory can be different, but it seems to me I was able to shoot almost every time everything that rifle pointed at. For certain, a lot of Oklahoma coyotes were absent for the nightly howl. Now, today, I measure everyting twice, clean everything to the point of idiocity, read everything I can get my hands on to help improve accuracy of a 200 yard group by small degrees, spend money on the best loading paraphernalia and rifles I can afford, well, you know the drill.
At the end of the day though, I am not sure I have gained a hell of a lot in accuracy. The journey has been a good one though and a lot of fun.
Enjoyed your post.
Bob
 
So where do we get one of the tunneling microscopy devices?
I keep getting shots out at 3 oclock and 9 oclock which the best components, most expensive scopes, stocks,barrels and most meticulous load developement dont seem to repair. All I can put it down to is some sort of imbalance in the bullet.
 
I fall somewhere between Howard Hughes, and Chuck Norris(who roundhouse kicks arrogant ammo to send a message to the others)..
 
Thank you kind sirs for the great info, I have just recently started getting my feet wet in this whole accuracy thing, and what an education it has, is, and will be. Now, after this latest information overload, I have decided to just stick with the "keep it simple, stupid" mentality. Now, if I could just decide on the throat length, and lands angle for my build I will be set.
Thanks for the laugh guys.
 
Are you saying there is another way to do it besides the OCD way? If so I would like to hear it though I am not sure I could break from my OCD ways
 
I have heard that some of the realy top shooters have resorted to something realy esoteric called "wind flags" or something like that??? I, not sure if these go on the rifle or are part of the reloading equipment, but they arent as expensive as Juenke machines or sodiummonopolymolypythelethylethylate core projectiles, so I dont think I will go that extreme.
 
Guys guys guys someone will be killed if a dbfs isn't anchored correctly. Come on simple welds and bolts will not hold this device. Everyone knows that you have to put pillars down to bed rock and fill with concrete this is the only way that it can be used safely. Do not forget that all bearings should be lubricated with unicorn tears.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,256
Messages
2,215,316
Members
79,506
Latest member
Hunt99elk
Back
Top