Here's another quick video (35-seconds) I made today while using the new Teslong.
From in a 30-cal Krieger barrel with the powder fouling cleaned out, but with no copper remover, then left for an extended time. It shows well what copper fouling looks like after time has elapsed and it's erosion factor as it rusts:
Sorry, but have to disagree with that philosophy. Based from my own experience, feel if you had removed the copper also, all 3 of your groups would have had a better chance of staying consistently small. Plus the erosion factor of leaving copper fouling in, to get ran over even more, can be detrimental to the barrel surface under such fouling.That's what my .308 Krieger barrel in my RPR looked like through my Teslong scope before I took it out today. I left the copper fouling in and fired 175 Federal Premium Match today instead of my hand loads (they've been sitting around for a while). 1st 5 round group was .148 (I felt I should quit there and go home with a smile). Next 5 round group at .219 (still making me smile). Next was .351. Well. . . leaving that copper fouling I saw worked out well.This Teslong scope really works well and shows more that I care to look at.
![]()
Thanks. I guess I am just a little nervous, having never ordered anything directly from overseas. (at least that I know of)Don’t worry. Teslong has excellent customer service. They ship pretty fast too considering it’s coming from overseas.
You are welcome. I have the hard scope and this new model. The new one is much better.Thanks. I guess I am just a little nervous, having never ordered anything directly from overseas. (at least that I know of)
We're not talking big bucks here anyway.