Sorting bullets, brass, and primers.

[Rich S]

Yeah that’s why I shot for 1/2 a day mixing different weight bullets. That’s just a typical group! How’s that for a tendency? Kinda got boring!

Bart

Bart
Have you tested at longer ranges also.

 

[BartsBullets]

Bart
Have you tested at longer ranges also.

Rich,

Here’s the point! Those that sort and fuss over a couple of tenths of weight between bullets are Wasting their Time! It just doesn’t show up. Not at short or long range.

Bart

 

[Ned Ludd]

Rich,

Here’s the point! Those that sort and fuss over a couple of tenths of weight between bullets are Wasting their Time! It just doesn’t show up. Not at short or long range.

Bart

But it might improve both personal character and manual dexterity.

 

[INTJ]

I just purchased this and didn’t quite understand that you are measuring every single primer....when you said 2 primers a minute, I didn’t believe you or didn’t understand what you said all the way....this will take some practice and testing for me to see if it is worth the effort

It did take a few FPS off my extreme spreads, and it eliminates measuring primer depth, reseating, and sorting by primer seating depth. For me it's about a wash in the amount of time it takes, but I know my primers are seated as consistently as they can be seated. I only do it for BR.....

 

[whatwind?]

I just used it (k&m) for the first time on 20 cases and it’s not too bad only issue I run into is handling the primer from measurement to hand/table and into seater stem, overall not too bad.....my “zero” had a .006 range, most Re-zero’d back to zero, maybe I am thinking about that wrong, either way it’s not bad and worth a test, thanks for sharing

 

[INTJ]

I just used it (k&m) for the first time on 20 cases and it’s not too bad only issue I run into is handling the primer from measurement to hand/table and into seater stem, overall not too bad.....my “zero” had a .006 range, most Re-zero’d back to zero, maybe I am thinking about that wrong, either way it’s not bad and worth a test, thanks for sharing

That sounds about right. Most pretty close and a few .005" or so out. I think that is mainly due to variances in primer height, but a little of it must have to do with variations in pocket depth--even on uniformed pockets.