• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Skip's Shims

Again, you guys can't convince me a steel sizing die and a steel shell holder change dimensions if you just smash them together in a press harder.

Now, having said that. If there is a gap between your die and shell holder and you're changing shims while a gap remains then that's another circus and group of monkeys. But that's not what at least some guys say they are doing.
If my setup will not allow for enough sizing I’ll take a touch off the end of the die to add clearance. You could do the same and take some off the top of your shellholder. Since I use the Redding comp shellholders I’ll take it off the die if I need clearance.

Btw I have a feeling there’s some miscommunication going on in this thread and subsequent arguing has ensued.
 
Well I guess I deserve that even if it's not true.
Not really directed at you but I can see how it might look that way and I'm sorry for that. I know you aren't him, just trying to lighten things up a little. These days over half the people on this sight haven't even been around long enough to know who he is, just a little inside joke for some of the members that have been around for a while . LOL

On another note I think I see where you might be having a disconnect with this whole setting up the die with shims. When guys say they are setting up say with a .010" shim from the start that means they are doing a regular die set up, bottoming out on the shell holder, then they lock the die ring in place, remove the die and install a .010" shim and try a piece of brass then measur. If they need more bump then they reduce the amount of shim as needed. Buy doing it this way it eliminates potentially ruining a piece a brass by over bumping it as could be the case by bottoming out the die on the shell holder and sizing a piece of brass. Hope this helps you understand better as I think this may be where you where having a disconnect with the shim setup.
 
Last edited:
Not really directed at you but I can see how it might look that way and I'm sorry for that. I know you aren't him, just trying to lighten things up a little. These days over half the people on this sight haven't even been around long enough to know who he is, just a little inside joke for some of the members that have been around for a while . LOL

On another note I think I see where you might be having a disconnect with this whole setting up the die with shims. When guys say they are setting up say with a .010" shim from the start that means they are doing a regular die set up, bottoming out on the shell holder, then they lock the die ring in place, remove the die and install a .010" shim and try a piece of brass then measur. If they need more bump then they reduce the amount of shim as needed. Buy doing it this way it eliminates potentially ruining a piece a brass by over bumping it as could be the case by bottoming out the die on the shell holder and sizing a piece of brass. Hope this helps you understand better as I think this may be where you where having a disconnect with the shim setup.
And I completely understand that. The OP of this thread either doesn't set his up that way or he did a very bad job of explaining it.Screenshot_20230325_062910_Chrome.jpg
 
And the above is what makes no sense to me. Simply smashing a steel die against a steel shell holder with more force and expecting the brass within the die to change size?
 
Last edited:
Use feeler gages to set the proper gap between the bottom of the die and the shell holder.
This way you can be a member of the My Wife Has All My Money Club.


7FfXhJ7.jpg
 
Last edited:
I believe the confusion lies in this paragraph-

Fourth, if you set up your FL die properly with the shims, you can change the amount of bump simply by replacing the shim. There are different methods to set up the FL die with them. For me, setting up with the .010" work better for ME since it gives me a wide range of bump options by using one of the thinner shims in the set which range from .008 down to .003. Set up this way, the shell holder is always in contact with the die. You never have to change the lock ring of the die to make a sizing adjustment.

A picture or two of the “set up” may clairlfy this for readers.
Thx
 
I had used shims the same way, but for a different purpose. I have 4 bolt action 8MM Mauser rifles and I used the shims so I could use a single die to properly size the brass for each rifle w/o having to reset the die each time I wanted to reload. I tried the witness mark idea, but I could not get that to work well enough for me. The shims worked perfectly. As the years went on I was fortunate enough to have the funds to buy each rifle its own die.
 
And the above is what makes no sense to me. Simply smashing a steel die against a steel shell holder with more force and expecting the brass within the die to change size?
I suggest you move on. Use other method. Skip Shims are not the only method; others work equally well perhaps even better for some. I merely offered it as an inexpensive alternative. I've explained the process in detail and don't have any more that I can offer.

I'm sorry I can post a picture; I've never been able to successfully to that. However, I don't understand how a picture of a shim under the lock rings is going to clarify its use. I don't see how posting a picture of a measurement with a bump gauge before and after that clearly show the shoulder has been bumped by using a thinner shim after the initial setup is going to clarify the issue.

You seem to have a problem understanding that if a FL die is turned down beyond contact with the shell holder that the case will receive more sizing. If you read the standard instructions by RCBS for setting up a FL die you will see that they tell you to screw the die down 1/8 to 1/4 turn from where the die contacts the shell holder. This creates a "cam over" condition and increases the sizing. Most of us know that is not a good practice because it results in too much sizing that's why bump gauges are used to set the FL die to a lessor cam over condition to produce the optimum sizing for that die. But the point is that turning the die down increases the sizing up to a point.

I really don't wish to debate this issue anymore.
 
Not really directed at you but I can see how it might look that way and I'm sorry for that. I know you aren't him, just trying to lighten things up a little. These days over half the people on this sight haven't even been around long enough to know who he is, just a little inside joke for some of the members that have been around for a while . LOL

On another note I think I see where you might be having a disconnect with this whole setting up the die with shims. When guys say they are setting up say with a .010" shim from the start that means they are doing a regular die set up, bottoming out on the shell holder, then they lock the die ring in place, remove the die and install a .010" shim and try a piece of brass then measur. If they need more bump then they reduce the amount of shim as needed. Buy doing it this way it eliminates potentially ruining a piece a brass by over bumping it as could be the case by bottoming out the die on the shell holder and sizing a piece of brass. Hope this helps you understand better as I think this may be where you where having a disconnect with the shim setup.
I completely understand that, however that is not the way everyone in this thread describes how they set the die up to use the shims. At this point it's beating a dead horse anyway. I have 2 sets of shims ordered and when they arrive I will prove or disprove the described set ups to myself.
Thanks to you who have remained cordial in your replies. I appreciate candor. Insults and name calling, not so much.
 
I completely understand that, however that is not the way everyone in this thread describes how they set the die up to use the shims. At this point it's beating a dead horse anyway. I have 2 sets of shims ordered and when they arrive I will prove or disprove the described set ups to myself.
Thanks to you who have remained cordial in your replies. I appreciate candor. Insults and name calling, not so much.
Good answer. I think you both are correct in some aspect.
DSHORTT is correct in that when steel is in firm contact with another piece of steel, there is no give and no room for further bump.
K22 is correct when he says that removing a shim or turning a die down a tad bit after shellholder-to-die contact will usually give more bump.

This apparent paradox is due to the “slop” in the press or the press flexing under pressure. The press has many links made of different materials and additional pressure is sometimes needed to guarantee max shoulder bump. Of course, it depends on the press. I would not expect this flex to be a factor in a Prazipress or the new Zero.
 
Last edited:
Here is a little story that may increase the understanding of some who have posted here. Going on 30 years back I had a .220 Swift and a RCBS, one piece FL sizing die. The chamber was in a factory Savage barrel, and I have it on good authority that those dies were made to size down to SAAMI minimum spec. for loaded ammunition. In other words they changed the diameter of a fired case quite a lot, which requires more effort than one that is a close fit to a chamber. When I first set up the die, I raised the ram of my Rock Chucker to the top of its stroke and screwed the die down until it touched the shell holder, and tightened the lock ring. Then I lubed a case and ran it fully into the die, and noticed something. There was now a gap between the die and the shell holder. Curious, I got out my set of automotive feeler gauges and found the one that fit the gap. It was .006. Thinking about it for a minute, it became obvious that this was caused by linkage stretch, and that if I needed it, I had an additional .006 of down die adjustment to work with. This is why you can gain some sizing when adjusting a die, a little more toward the shell holder when it was initally set up to touch the shell holder with no case in place.....linkage stretch, or in some cases compression.

On the Skips shims, If you do an initial die setup with a .010 shim under the lock ring, and you need to change the die setting because of additional spring back from the brass becoming work hardened from repeated firings and sizing. All you have to do is to substitute a .009 shim, check the result, and if the bump is not happening or is not enough, substitute the .008 shim and so on. The initial setup with the .010 shim should be done just as if it was not there. What the shims do is give you the ability to easily make PRECISE adjustments by substituting progressively thinner shims. Doing this freehand is more difficult because of how little the die is turned to make a .001 adjustment. For those who have not done the calculation (1 divided by 14) one full turn moves the die .071".
 
Here is a little story that may increase the understanding of some who have posted here. Going on 30 years back I had a .220 Swift and a RCBS, one piece FL sizing die. The chamber was in a factory Savage barrel, and I have it on good authority that those dies were made to size down to SAAMI minimum spec. for loaded ammunition. In other words they changed the diameter of a fired case quite a lot, which requires more effort than one that is a close fit to a chamber. When I first set up the die, I raised the ram of my Rock Chucker to the top of its stroke and screwed the die down until it touched the shell holder, and tightened the lock ring. Then I lubed a case and ran it fully into the die, and noticed something. There was now a gap between the die and the shell holder. Curious, I got out my set of automotive feeler gauges and found the one that fit the gap. It was .006. Thinking about it for a minute, it became obvious that this was caused by linkage stretch, and that if I needed it, I had an additional .006 of down die adjustment to work with. This is why you can gain some sizing when adjusting a die, a little more toward the shell holder when it was initally set up to touch the shell holder with no case in place.....linkage stretch, or in some cases compression.

On the Skips shims, If you do an initial die setup with a .010 shim under the lock ring, and you need to change the die setting because of additional spring back from the brass becoming work hardened from repeated firings and sizing. All you have to do is to substitute a .009 shim, check the result, and if the bump is not happening or is not enough, substitute the .008 shim and so on. The initial setup with the .010 shim should be done just as if it was not there. What the shims do is give you the ability to easily make PRECISE adjustments by substituting progressively thinner shims. Doing this freehand is more difficult because of how little the die is turned to make a .001 adjustment. For those who have not done the calculation (1 divided by 14) one full turn moves the die .071".
Thanks for clarifying what I thought was a simple concept. I was just trying to help and offer another way to manage bump, inexpensively. Apparently, I confused some members which I apologize. But I can assure, those Skip Shims work.

Conventional presses like RCBC, Redding, Lyman, etc. have inherent cam over tendencies precisely as you described because of the play in the linkages. My press in an RCBC Jr., over 50 years old. Using the Skip Shims and a bump gauge (Whidden) I can make precise bump adjustments.
 
Thanks for clarifying what I thought was a simple concept. I was just trying to help and offer another way to manage bump, inexpensively. Apparently, I confused some members which I apologize. But I can assure, those Skip Shims work.

Conventional presses like RCBC, Redding, Lyman, etc. have inherent cam over tendencies precisely as you described because of the play in the linkages. My press in an RCBC Jr., over 50 years old. Using the Skip Shims and a bump gauge (Whidden) I can make precise bump adjustments.
Your post was both timely, and well written. I wish that I could say that all of mine have been. Having spent some time in front of students explaining things, I have become acutely aware that individuals may need something explained in a different way in order that they may understand. That was all that I was trying to do.
 
So reading all of this if you have a press like a lee classic cast press with hard stop on linkages you can't size anymore? Since once you remove thicker shim and go to thinner shim you don't have anymore camming ability?or will the lee classic cast with hard stop still have some play to gain more sizing after hard stop on linkages and shell holder? I'm using Redding comp shell holders and thinking of ordering shims as well but want know or understand what I'm doing for sure.
Sorry to add to confusion but trying to learn as well.hate to read all of this and come away confused thx
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,449
Messages
2,195,310
Members
78,883
Latest member
FIDI_G
Back
Top