This thread started out well. And as usual the "we're better than them" starts.
That's the only thing that sucks about competition. Ones not better than the others. Dividing shooters with false pride is desperation.
It's spreading throughout this country.
If your comments are directed toward me, Johnny, I'm afraid you've misread and misunderstood me.
For starters, every word I said is true..not false at all.
Second, I've been in the br game long enough that I well pre date ubr and I can tell you that I'm not envious of other orgs. In fact, I hope they all do well. Not sure where that came from either but if you wanna talk about it in more detail, I'm happy to, as I very much consider you a friend and I'm sure we can do so, respectfully and cordially.
As for advertisement, what i said wasn't intended as that but I can't control how you took it. So...
With that all out of the way, it should be more apparent to the op why combining orgs is a stretch. Albeit a well intentioned one that sounds good.
Tell me how we can integrate a 4 target, six bull, caliber neutral, 11 pt scoring system with IBS or NBRSA score. I can tell you that in the first couple of years of ubr, we held them alongside of ibs matches...side by side, together. The choice was left up to the shooters at the time, which one we'd continue with. Lost a couple of guys but overall, matches grew under the then new ubr format. I can go into a lot more detail but I no longer hold any grudges against any org and want the best for all.
Judging from a couple of posts here, it seems there's a chip on a couple of shoulders but it's not on mine. Having fun and enjoying the company as well as the sport as a whole, is what br is about. Viability is a factor, of course. So I want all to do well.