• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Savage ejection problem even after ejector and extractor upgrade

I have heard that Savage bolt headspace can vary from bolt to bolt.
That's lug length minus face depth.
Each bolt head must be headspaced to the rifle.
Here's 2 308 bolt heads.
what does yours measure?
View attachment 1536831

Removing metal from the barrel removes chamber length and exposes more of the case head.
Good point! I've never seen that much variance but good point! Most I've seen are around .125ish, so both of those are thicker than what I'd call normal. The good thing is that Savage requires less unsupported case than most other actions and that includes most customs. Most of which are closer to .150ish. That's part of the reason I like less bolt clearance than the "standard" .010. I have no idea where that number came from. Read years ago that the Rem 3 rings of steel design, which is VERY good if done right, was intended to have .003-.005 clearances at all areas other than headspace relating to chambering. That didn't last long because I don't think I've ever had a Remington in the shop that had those tolerances, though. Still, less is more here, generally speaking. I've seen it perform as designed and it flat worked. Meaning, the 3 rings. Even in a worst case...ppc case head on a 308 bolt face and a sako extractor. The extractor didn't fail and the brass failed at the ejector, not the extractor...fwiw. Good engineering Mike Walker!
 
Last edited:
You also appear to have contact rings (slight) across both lug faces.
Your bolt was working fine when it had a 308 barrel on it, and now a new barrel doesn't work.
New barrel sort of = new rifle.
I still say (not an expert here for sure) Face the bolt face about 0.003" with a bias toward the contact area. This will NOT change headspace. Taking material off bolt lug face reduces lug length about as much as it reduces face depth.
But that depends on your lug measurements.
 
Last edited:
I have heard that Savage bolt headspace can vary from bolt to bolt.
That's lug length minus face depth.
Each bolt head must be headspaced to the rifle.
A barrel change IS a new rifle.
Did the GunSmith chamber your barrel to the high end of the bolt head lug length spec or the middle?
Here's 2 308 bolt heads.
what does yours measure?
View attachment 1536831

Removing metal from the barrel removes chamber length and exposes more of the case head.

A simpler method (when using a barrel nut) is to measure the depth of the bolt face recess and make the go gage protrude .005" longer out of the chamber. If you're using a prefit and don't have a lathe, check to make sure you have this much clearance and I suppose you could use a file to carefully shorten the tenon if you can't or don't want to use a gunsmith. Savage's print of the action/barrel specifies a maximum of .130" of the go gage out of the shank, but best to make it have a relationship with the bolt face depth as above.
 
Something else I just want to clarify, so there's no confusion.
It is perfectly normal for the bolt to contact the end of the bbl on most actions, WITH AN EMPTY CHAMBER. The case or hs gage should stop it from happening when chambered though. Proper headspacing sets this gap. So yes, if the bbl is chambered too deep, the bolt could contact the bbl with a loaded chamber. As others have said, this should be corrected by taking some material off of the bbl breech end but I'm very skeptical that's your problem at all. The only thing to keep the bolt from falling all the way out of the action, forwardly, is the bolt handle if the bbl were removed. Yes, a Savage is a bit different but the principle is still the same.
Oh Ok, so should I run the same test with a shell casing in the chamber to see if the bolt is still contacting the barrel when a round is chambered? I ran the test with an empty chamber, that’s when the bolt was contacting the barrel only after pulling the trigger and dropping the hammer on the empty chamber.

As far as the bolt head measurement and rim width on the 2 different brands of brass I don’t have calipers or anything to really measure that. I’m not currently reloading but hope to be able to get the tools to start this year. Also the barrel was a pre fit that was chambered by northland shooters supply. I have a friend that can cut and chamber barrels and I should have just had him measure my action and cut a shouldered barrel for me but I thought the prefit would be cheaper and easier. Live and learn I guess
 
Would not the easiest way to check if the bolt is tight against the barrel would be to close the bolt UNCOCKED and pull the bolt handle forward and back. There should be some end play, if there I none then I would think the bolt is against the barrel. I think it was suggested to check how far the go gage sticks out of the chamber, and compare that to the depth of the bolt face counterbore. You might try that too.
I'm not really a Savage knowledgeable guy, so hope this makes sense.

FWIW
Steve Kostanich
 
So... I fought this exact problem with a couple of Savage actions. Only in 6.5CM. Barrels in other calibers worked just fine.

Wanna know what the problem is?

The brass. Specifically, Hornady.

Bear with me here.

The short version is that Hornady has a little looser tolerances on their extractor groove diameter than most - specifically they allow it to be *smaller* than most other brands (everything I tested, personally, but not exhaustive). The hook on the extractor is able to pull the case out of the chamber, but if it can't bottom out in the groove, the case becomes 'unlatcheded' when it clears the chamber and the ejector is pushing sideways on it. The case just drops right in the ejection port. Not every time, because not *all* Hornady cases are on the small size in the groove - just some.

If you go and cycle the brass through the gun, you'll find some that will eject *every* time, no problem. And you'll find some that will not eject, no way, just drop right there in the ejection port. And you'll find a few that will go either way, depending on how you manipulate the bolt. Take the ones that eject every time, and the ones that fail every time, and measure the groove diameter with a caliper - you'll see the difference.

IIRC, there is a max spec for the groove diameter, which most manufacturers stick pretty close to - more meat in that area means the primer pocket is a little bit stronger. *Technically* Hornady is still above the absolute rock bottom minimum spec diameter for the groove... but not by much, and somewhat inconsistent. Not surprisingly, Hornady brass also has somewhat of a rap for having 'soft' primer pockets compared to more premium brands - I suspect this might be part of why that is.

The easiest fix is to just use something other than Hornady factory ammo (and brass). Problem solved, and rock on.

Theoretically you can try pulling the extractor, and undercutting the lip a bit so it can maybe dig in a little further. Didn't work much better for me, but maybe you'll get lucky. Thinking about it... most of the 'upgrades we do to Savage extractors is to take up the slop in the ball detent - going from 0.125 to 0.140 ball, etc. - and might actually work against us in this particular situation. Lengthening the slot in the ejector pin might allow additional travel, maybe keeping it 'pinned' against the extractor a little better - but again, if memory serves, nothing really helped if the extractor hook wasn't able to bottom out against the groove in the case.

Previous post with actual numbers
 
The .125 ball might allow the extractor to go further in, but also slop further out.
If you want the extractor to have travel room ONLY in the in direction touch the ball relief on the under side on the outside edge and use the .140 ball.
(that would work better with a picture :) )
 
Last edited:
True. And per the linked post... it might be worth trying the WSM ejector / extractor, as they are subtly different in geometry than the 'regular' parts. Though why those aren't standard fare by now... <shrug>
 
I just had my son cut a 6.5 CM chamber for me. I have two Model 12 target actions. The depth of the recesses in the bolts are .003" different. I gave him the deepest bolt and asked him for .005" clearance from the face of the bolt to the back of the barrel just like any other build. It will work with my other action now just like the other seven barrels from three different manufactures. My OEM ejector spring has two coils ground off and drops the cases on the bench about a foot from the port every time.
 
Last edited:

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,564
Messages
2,198,550
Members
78,984
Latest member
Deon
Back
Top