Hopkins said:
Jo 1911, in general what factors come into play influencing your choice of powder for a break in regimen?
First off, Homer I think, JMO, I think your right. Done incorrectly I can see it causing problems. Hence my caveat "not to wet"
I've done just about every imaginable thing to a barrel you can think of and I would try the ATF (if warranted) but,,,,,, one sopping wet patch followed by a dry reinserted three times.
Thats my (just mine) method of wet bore firing. Over wet and puddles you definately want to avoid.
Hopkins
Now your asking questions that can draw more ridicule than barrel break in procedures ;D
Its OK its not the first time.
I could type pages of opinions born of my expieriences on this one subject and get laughed at for every sentence.
It goes far beyond barrel run in. (like the Aussie term better) It goes forth into accuracy and more importantly (to me) substainable accuracy.
Given a suitable projectile at the barrels preferred distance from the lands we can all see varying degrees of accuracy with different powders.
We can also see differing amount of shots fired, without cleaning and maintaining accuracy with different powders.
WHY?
I personally call this "bore condition". Not the condition of the steel but the condition of the fouling present in the bore.
That IMO is where accuracy begins, just begins, to start.
Steadily accumulate copper and accuracy will suffer.
Steadily accumulate carbon and accuracy will suffer.
You find the right powder for your particular barrel/bullet combo that will not accumulate either AND still produce accuracy and a winning combo is born.
Quick examples of sucesses in my endeavors.
2 factory Savage barrels in egg shoots with naked 35 gn Bergers and W-748. A winning combo that would shoot all season (500+) rounds with never a patch down the bore.
Same barrels could copper/carbon foul out with other powders in 20 shots.
I've been through five of those barrels but only two could dream of getting close to .25 moa with any consistency whatsoever. Never an easy task with factory chambers/bores.
My full custom 6PPC has well over 3000 rds down the tube. Still shoots well (well not great) if I scrub it clean constantly using n-133.
Toss Ramshot X-Terminator in it along with HBN coated pills and it becomes a 500+ rd barrel with no patchs. OK, outright accuracy is still not up to snuff with " national winning" 6 PPC's but consistency is there all year. 6 BR 1-14 likes the same combo just more of it. All year no cleaning.
I learned this stuff from my first accurate barrel and "the need" to fire 100 rds without cleaning in egg shoot competitions.
Its darn easy to find a barrel/powder/bullet combo that will shoot accurately with a cleaning rod always present.
I personally demand 100+ rds on all my barrels.
I still have my first hummer factory tube with well over 4000+ rds through it. Throat is visibly deteroriated without a scope and theres what I call "a divot" about half way down. Feel it with a patch easily enough. Expieriment gone awry I imagine. Maybe just a piece of rifling disappeared.
I'd wager I can screw that old burnt out varmint barrel on any Savage action and the first five shots out of the bore (prepped in just a fashion) with 35 gn Bergers(also prepped in just a fashion) would produce a zero group. No foulers needed. Extreme spread of 200+ fps.
Thats more than I ask or expect from my PPC.
Trying to resurrect that poor old barrel from the dead taught me just as much as when it was new and finicky.
Oddly enough the lesson was exactly the same. Bore condition is everything.
Does'nt much matter how perfect the steel is as long as the bullet has the "SAME EXACT FEEL" as it goes down that bore.
I've never loaded for the Swede but if appliacable I'd try W-760/H-414 or IMR-4350. Something with a little more carbon than Hodgen Extremes but not too much either.
Never saw any gun run "long term" on any powder with an "R" in front of it.
Oh Boy, sit back and watch the flames grow