CatShooter
fguffey said:Quote from: 243winxb on Yesterday at 07:46 AM
If loading on a progressive press, i would want more than 3 thousands. Each station of a progressive may produce a different shoulder bump.
And then Catfish posted:
But only ONE STATION does any bumping.
Someone has to explaine to catfish the shell plate does not have a designated sizing position, a disciplined reloader would measure the deck height of each position on the shell plate to determine the effect of each position.
Then there is the basic understanding of shop skills. The shell plate hangs out and off of the ram. the cantilever effect reduces the effectiveness of the ability of the press to size.
F. Guffey
Well... since we all know that you invented the progressive loading machine, then perhaps you can contact Dillon and tell them they are making BIG mistakes in their designs.
Cuz actually, a progressive machine DOES have a designated sizing station, and even if someone was dumb enough to put a sizing die in the wrong station, it is still ONE STATION, unless you want to have more than one sizing die in a progressive press... but who would do something as stupid as that??
I personally own 2 Dillon 1050's, one Dillon 1000, and a Dillon 550, a commercial RCBS linear loading machine, and two Hornady Progressive machines... that is 7 progressive loading machines, and is just for the home play place.
For work... we do it larger.
Our brass came in 6x6x6 boxes... that are 6 feet by 6 feet by 6 feet weighing over a half a ton (No lot numbers





And moved the cases with a forklift.

Between 2010 and 2012, I loaded 18 tons (36,000 pounds) of 223.
So, Mister Goofy, tell me about progressive loading machines when you get chance, but AFTER you get through with telling Dillon (and Hornady and RCBS) what they are doing wrong.