Here's the previous thread on this issue. It's quite long but the link at the top explains what issues are being litigated. I didn't search it all, but as I recall, there's a pic of the ad I spoke of.
http://forum.accurateshooter.com/th...be-sued-over-sandyhook.3974637/#post-37454190
Quote from the article.
"The regulation of advertising that threatens the public's health, safety, and morals has long been considered a core exercise of the states' police powers," Justice Richard Palmer wrote for the majority.
One caution: News media no longer reports news in a factual manner but instead mixes a lot of OPINION intertwined with some quotes. One has to be careful to sort out the facts, "just the facts ma'am" as Jack Webb used to say.
The fact is that the high courts have generally upheld the 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, rejecting lawsuits against gun manufactures. This case is no exception as the high court rejected all elements except the advertising issue.
EDIT: My post in the linked thread (#36) references a screen grab on the evening news, so maybe someone with better searching skills than me can find that screen grab.
Ok, here's an example I found:
https://www.businessinsider.com/heres-how-guns-are-advertised-in-america-2012-12