plinker625 said:
Robin Shaprless is the VP at Redding robin.sharpless@Redding-Reloading.com, tell him not the staffers that man the phones. The OP can whine, whimper, and publicly scold them but nothing is going to change. Priorities lie elsewhere, hell they have just started shipping product that was announced 6 months ago. There is a solution that does not cost much money, use the Forster die boxes! Problem solved. Hell, I bet if the OP asked John Walton at the Gunstop he may get Forster Die Box with the next purchase of Competition Dies..... there are bigger fish to fry and a better use of capital dollars to suit just a few people.....
Thank you for the contact info. I will be contacting Robin with my issues.
As for a cheap solution, that has never been the issue. I’m well aware that there are cheap solutions, and beyond that I can make anything I want, I could go design a box, make a silicone rubber mold and pull as many bootleg XL Redding cases as I want, or CNC machine some out of solid aluminum, but if you notice the title of the thread it’s not about looking for a solution, it’s about principles and making a company do the right thing.
Bringing a product 95% of the way home is not acceptable when you are selling in the premium market. I like Redding, I like their products and buy many of them. I have all the respect in the world for the hard working machinist that put out top notch work, I do however have a problem with whatever bean counter decided it’s ok to forgo a new tool and pretty much screw the guys buying there most expensive stuff.
Call me a whiner, I could care less, this isn’t about putting $300 Redding dies in a $5 Forester box, this is about money being hard to come by in this economy and expecting top notch products and service when paying top notch prices.
I wouldn’t buy a Ferrari and put a $20 Autozone car cover on it, I wouldn’t put a nice Blaser OU in a $15 Chinese made case with half hazard zippers and thus I do not want to put my top of the line Redding dies in anything but a properly designed Redding case with a Redding sticker and part number. Clearly you expect less for your money and that’s fine, doesn’t mean everyone should be happy with the circumstances.
You also claim the reason they are not doing it because for one, the capital is high and two, there are not enough users to justify it. Well I hate to say it but you may have just made my case for me. I’m not sure how much you know about molding but there are steel tools that run forever and cost a fortune and then there are low run “soft†tools made from aluminum. These tools come at a fraction of the cost and are perfect when you don’t need a million parts from the tool. We have set up customers with soft tools and have pulled 30,000 units EASY from them, my guess is a soft tool for such a box would be in the 15K range, maybe a little more. When paying $200-300 a die set its not unreasonable to ask the company to sacrifice 1% profit to deliver a complete product.
And why should a proprietor of a small business have to take up the slack to make a multi-million dollar firm like Redding’s product better? That’s ludicrous and I’d never ask someone to do that, it’s not anyone fault but the smartest guys in the room at Redding, and again I for one am not looking to put my Redding dies in a Forester box.
Go read some of the articles on the web about profit In the firearms and reloading industries, these companies are NOT hurting right now, they are adding shifts and making more money than ever and I for one am glad they are, that’s the American way! But that same capitalist system that allows companies with solid products to thrive also allows the consumer to take their hard earned money elsewhere if they feel they are not getting a fair shake. This is of course is my personal opinion and only that, but as a long time supporter of Redding and their products I feel it’s their turn to pay it forward and bring a properly designed box to market that ACTULLY works with their current offerings, not the products for 20 years ago.