Exactly.dkhunt14 said:I don't think it is any different. I would want my hunting gun pillar bedded with Devcon and chambered just as good as a bench gun. My Smith builds both and most bench rest builders do the same. If the smith lies it's time to get a new smith. Matt
R&D and guarantee from a hunting rifle in a particular chamber would be the same as with a BR gun.zfastmalibu said:How is the method of building and accurate rifle different in a hunting rifle or br rifle?
dkhunt14 said:I don't know of any builder that guarantees 1/4 moa accuracy. Rem 40x used to guarantee 1/2 and some others did also. He said he wants 22 cal 1/4 moa. I would do a 22Br or Dasher. That would make it possible. Matt
You hit the nail on the headeffendude said:dkhunt14 said:I don't know of any builder that guarantees 1/4 moa accuracy. Rem 40x used to guarantee 1/2 and some others did also. He said he wants 22 cal 1/4 moa. I would do a 22Br or Dasher. That would make it possible. Matt
The original question of the poster doesn't reflect his current thinking. He knows he doesn't need a 1/4MOA rifle to shoot coyotes and a honest 1/2MOA rifle will produce awes at every rifle range I have shot at. I think everyone agrees that the poster will have to write a big check to any smith who will make that 1/4MOA claim before building the rifle. Heck, most shooters would struggle to get that out of a rifle in a hunting configuration.
I believe many of the replies to this thread are attempting to say there are better ways to spend money. I can almost guarantee far more coyotes are shot using a 2MOA rifle with a $100 scope which spends its life in the rack of a truck than with a high buck rifle.
Get an accurate rifle, scope load your ammo and enjoy it.
Scott
Yeah but the hunting guns I see that are accurate are built with benchrest gun techniques. Mattmikecr said:You hunt for prairie dogs? Really? You stalk them with your 17lb BR gun?
Well anyway,
A 1/4moa gun is only that in actual use, and not per build.
So when you have a system you can carry in the field(actual hunting), and it produces 1/4moa of accuracy in this application, with enough energy to kill intended game, then you hold a 1/4moa hunting gun no matter who built it. I credit your work in this as well.
Until then, no amount of pedigree guarantees this, and it cannot be predicted or assumed. If it could be, then there would be the guarantees out there. Right? I don't see em, not even for 17lb+ naval guns built for BR.
I'm not saying that any particular guns, custom or factory, couldn't be 1/4moa hunting guns. I'm saying it can't be assumed that a gun well purpose built for bench rest has a better chance at it than a gun well purpose built for hunting.
And either way, it isn't such a hunting gun until it proves to be so with practical field use.