Yessss!! This makes a lot of sense! I knew the dampening magnets had something to do with it, but could not figure out why. I also had noticed that the spigot for the auxiliary weight was magnetic but assumed Ohaus had made sure it was far enough to not be affected by the magnets.It's not too important exactly where the magnets are, as long as they're well clear of the damping blade. What is important is that they are not moving around, particularly on the 10/10.
Why on the 10/10 I hear you ask? The beam on the 10/10 scale is non magnetic, as with all modern scales, however, on the 10/10 the spigot where the auxiliary weight hangs IS magnetic, it's only an inch away from the damping magnets and I'm sure does have a slight effect. Probably not much of a problem if the magnets are fixed and the pull is consistent but, as with all delicate measurements, consistency is the key.
I believe it's this ferrous spigot causing the movement you observe when you place a magnet near the beam.
It doesn't seem very practical having to do this constantly, Is it just the nature of the beast?
When I work on the 10/10 scales I usually place a small strip of felt where the beam crashes down, it makes the scales much nicer to use.
HOZ53
The thin spring strip on the 10/10 is an approach to weight indicator device. A scale without this device, say a 505, will only start to read when it's just a couple of grains off it's set weight, if you throw a charge and it's 2.5 or 5.5 grains light the scale will still be stuck on the bottom.
With the 10/10, the spring strip acts on the bottom of the damper blade and starts to lift the beam off the bottom stop at around 5 grains, this makes for a much smoother beam lift when trickling to weight.
This device is also found on the RCBS 5-10 and funnily enough on the Lee scale.
Additionally (for those interested) the effects of the magnets on the auxiliary weight spigot are also seen as the blades move forward or backward on the agate bearings. That small amount of play is enough to affect the return to zero after weighing.
Do you really have to baby the scale when removing the pan, adjusting the large or small poise? I have resorted to holding the beam down when moving either poise as well as making sure the position of the blades on the agates is unchanged, after every adjustment and weighted charge.
Should I not expect it to go back to EXACTLY the same spot every time and consider that part of the +/- 0.1 gr?
Last edited: