Long thread for a simple answer. Yes.I asked if the current crop of PRS favourites in short barrelled guns could consistently make hits on steel out to 1200 yards.
Hi gang. Was wondering if any of you have shot your PRS race rigs outs to 1200 yards successfully? I''m not convinced 24-26" barrelled dashers and BRA's have the ballistics to do so, but I have no real world data.
Currently building a 6 Creedmoor on a Borden Alpine action with a 28"barrel with the hopes of hitting node around 3050-3100fps. 1000 yards seems to be achievable with the guns currently being used for PRS, but 1200 as those who have shot it know, is a different story.
I watched a shooter the other weekend with a Tac-Ops 308 and factory Federal match ammo hit nothing at 1200 after consistent hits from 600 to 1000. My 32" barrelled FTR rig shooting 200.20x pills does it easy. I know bigger cartridges will do it easier, but I want to know if the current PRS favourites will make the cut. We are having a steel event in a couple of weeks and only one PRS shooter has nominated. Was wondering it the longer ranges might have something to do with it.
I shot a Winchester model 70 stealth that I bought in 1993 in 308. All I ever shot out of it was 168 smks. For the first few years that I went prairie dog hunting in South Dakota that is what I used for a long range rifle. My shooting partner and I both shooting that rifle had numerous kills on prairie dogs between 1000-1450 yards. We either used a rangefinder, shot back at the truck or a handheld GPS unit to figure the distance.Disclaimer: I don't shoot PRS. I'm a knuckle dragging Palma shooter who mostly slings 155gr bullets out of a 30" 308 with iron sights at 1000 yrds at a 1-MOA X ring and 2-MOA 10 ring paper target.
There was a bit of discussion about bullets "making" it to 1200, the transonic effects, modern bullet design, etc. I'll offer a little food for thought.
1.) A 308 can push a Berger 155 hybrid to be supersonic at 1200 yards, and I personally saw someone do this to win a prone sling match over others shooting 6s/6.5s. 2.) I've also seen people push a 30cal 168gr Sierra matchking as hard as they can trying to make it to 1000 yrds, and it is like the bullet hits a brick wall at around 800-900 yards. It slows down fast, and tumbles like a gymnast as it approaches transonic speeds. If they happen to hit a target, they're likely keyholing and barely making it through the thick cardboard. 3.) I've pulled pits at 1000 for folks shooting 175 Sierras from a 308 with light loads and their bullets were coming through subsonic, yet their accuracy never dropped off.
That's three totally different 30cal bullets of increasing weight all shot from a long barrel 308. 155 hybrid is a modern design target bullet, the 168 is a old target bullet design created for 300meter ISSF target shooting with a boat tail angle that doesn't like transonic flight, and the 175 is a slightly more modern design (than the 168) with a better boat tail angle that allows for smooth transonic transition.
I'm curious: if you run the numbers on retained energy at target, does that number translate into a observable bullet impact/splash when using that to track your shots in PRS? Example: Using my local temps, air pressure, elevation and JBM ballistics: A 30cal-175SMK at 2650fps goes down to 1048 fps at 1200 and has 427 ft-lbs energy. A 6mm 105 Berger target hybrid at 3000fps goes down to 1351fps at 1200 and has 425 ft-lbs of energy. Would the impacts look similar, or would the size of the 308 make a more noticeable impact seen via scope?
Sorry if I'm intruding on your PRS focused discussion. Just found the discussion interesting.
That is pretty cool. With the right twist rate barrel length and load, I'm sure it can be done. Really smoking a 168 at 2900fps would make for about 72MOA drop. At the normal 168 speeds of 2700, it is around 85MOA. Dropping in on the prairie dogs like mortar fire!I shot a Winchester model 70 stealth that I bought in 1993 in 308. All I ever shot out of it was 168 smks. For the first few years that I went prairie dog hunting in South Dakota that is what I used for a long range rifle. My shooting partner and I both shooting that rifle had numerous kills on prairie dogs between 1000-1450 yards. We either used a rangefinder, shot back at the truck or a handheld GPS unit to figure the distance.
To the last part of your post, basically does a bigger diameter, heavier bullet make impacts more easily seen, from my somewhat limited experience, yes. A 175 or heavier 308 bullet definitely makes a bigger 'splash' than say a 107 class 6mm, even though the retained energy is nearly identical. I compare it to tossing a marble in the pool, versus tossing a baseball in. They both hit with the same speed, but the bigger ball will make a bigger splash.Disclaimer: I don't shoot PRS. I'm a knuckle dragging Palma shooter who mostly slings 155gr bullets out of a 30" 308 with iron sights at 1000 yrds at a 1-MOA X ring and 2-MOA 10 ring paper target.
There was a bit of discussion about bullets "making" it to 1200, the transonic effects, modern bullet design, etc. I'll offer a little food for thought.
1.) A 308 can push a Berger 155 hybrid to be supersonic at 1200 yards, and I personally saw someone do this to win a prone sling match over others shooting 6s/6.5s. 2.) I've also seen people push a 30cal 168gr Sierra matchking as hard as they can trying to make it to 1000 yrds, and it is like the bullet hits a brick wall at around 800-900 yards. It slows down fast, and tumbles like a gymnast as it approaches transonic speeds. If they happen to hit a target, they're likely keyholing and barely making it through the thick cardboard. 3.) I've pulled pits at 1000 for folks shooting 175 Sierras from a 308 with light loads and their bullets were coming through subsonic, yet their accuracy never dropped off.
That's three totally different 30cal bullets of increasing weight all shot from a long barrel 308. 155 hybrid is a modern design target bullet, the 168 is a old target bullet design created for 300meter ISSF target shooting with a boat tail angle that doesn't like transonic flight, and the 175 is a slightly more modern design (than the 168) with a better boat tail angle that allows for smooth transonic transition.
I'm curious: if you run the numbers on retained energy at target, does that number translate into a observable bullet impact/splash when using that to track your shots in PRS? Example: Using my local temps, air pressure, elevation and JBM ballistics: A 30cal-175SMK at 2650fps goes down to 1048 fps at 1200 and has 427 ft-lbs energy. A 6mm 105 Berger target hybrid at 3000fps goes down to 1351fps at 1200 and has 425 ft-lbs of energy. Would the impacts look similar, or would the size of the 308 make a more noticeable impact seen via scope?
Sorry if I'm intruding on your PRS focused discussion. Just found the discussion interesting.
i think most of mikes tac-ops .308's are built around the 168 fed gold metal match. He has a-lot of LE and military customers.Hi gang. Was wondering if any of you have shot your PRS race rigs outs to 1200 yards successfully? I''m not convinced 24-26" barrelled dashers and BRA's have the ballistics to do so, but I have no real world data.
Currently building a 6 Creedmoor on a Borden Alpine action with a 28"barrel with the hopes of hitting node around 3050-3100fps. 1000 yards seems to be achievable with the guns currently being used for PRS, but 1200 as those who have shot it know, is a different story.
I watched a shooter the other weekend with a Tac-Ops 308 and factory Federal match ammo hit nothing at 1200 after consistent hits from 600 to 1000. My 32" barrelled FTR rig shooting 200.20x pills does it easy. I know bigger cartridges will do it easier, but I want to know if the current PRS favourites will make the cut. We are having a steel event in a couple of weeks and only one PRS shooter has nominated. Was wondering it the longer ranges might have something to do with it.
I'm curious: if you run the numbers on retained energy at target, does that number translate into a observable bullet impact/splash when using that to track your shots in PRS? Example: Using my local temps, air pressure, elevation and JBM ballistics: A 30cal-175SMK at 2650fps goes down to 1048 fps at 1200 and has 427 ft-lbs energy. A 6mm 105 Berger target hybrid at 3000fps goes down to 1351fps at 1200 and has 425 ft-lbs of energy. Would the impacts look similar, or would the size of the 308 make a more noticeable impact seen via scope?
Sorry if I'm intruding on your PRS focused discussion. Just found the discussion interesting.
You wont offend most 308 shooters, as we know why folks opt for the higher BC, flatter shooting cartridges. Sorry in advance if that offends anyone.If I wanted to "Ring steel" at, 1,000 - 1,200 yards, RELIABLY, I would choose, a High BC, 140 - 144 grain Bullet for, a "Blown out", 6.5 X 55 GWI or, AI at, 2,950ish FPS with, "reasonable recoil" and Flat shooting,..
NOT, an old, .308 that,,, drops like, a Rock !
SORRY in advance, if that, offends anyone.
You wont offend most 308 shooters, as we know why folks opt for the higher BC, flatter shooting cartridges. Sorry in advance if that offends anyone.![]()