Bat Rastard
Gold $$ Contributor
I would respectfully disagree, as this flies negatively in the face if all the A&D fx120i users as well as the tuned beam scale guys including myself that can hold 2 inches of vertical at 1000 yards without an Analytical scale.Those types of scales and slide rules successfully sent men into space and back. But now you MUST have an analytical capable of measuring a fraction of a powder kernel.
Oh I agree, just a little sarcastic humor!I would respectfully disagree, as this flies negatively in the face if all the A&D fx120i users as well as the tuned beam scale guys including myself that can hold 2 inches of vertical at 1000 yards without an Analytical scale.
Scott, I would love to hear why.I have one, I do not use it. I could, but I don’t. If you wish to know why, I’ll be happy to answer.
Scott Parker
Somehow, I knew you would have a Stanton. I have a couple of Ainsworth and a Christian Becker.Although the 304 is a solid well made scale it's certainly not the most sensitive of reloading scales. When the 304 was available, say 1970-1990's it was quite an expensive scale compared with other common reloading scales but, back then, there was very little concern about single kernel accuracy. A tenth grain repeatability was good and a factory rifle that could shoot 1moa was also good - Now we just expect more.
Here's a couple of my beam scales - The original "Dial-o-grain" 1930 style and a Stanton AD4 from 1950's.
![]()
No doubt about it Ainsworth was a craftsman of the highest order, and mostly self taught.My Ainsworth picks up the mass of a pencil line on a small piece of graph paper.