• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Ohaus 1110 / RCBS 304 The coolest scale EVER!

It has a dial that is in .1grains. I can visually split tenths of a grain.
It is big enough that I don't have to have my reading glasses to use it.
It is definitely a cool machine.
 

Attachments

  • 20220511_172633.jpg
    20220511_172633.jpg
    534 KB · Views: 8
Last edited:
Those types of scales and slide rules successfully sent men into space and back. But now you MUST have an analytical capable of measuring a fraction of a powder kernel.
 
Those types of scales and slide rules successfully sent men into space and back. But now you MUST have an analytical capable of measuring a fraction of a powder kernel.
I would respectfully disagree, as this flies negatively in the face if all the A&D fx120i users as well as the tuned beam scale guys including myself that can hold 2 inches of vertical at 1000 yards without an Analytical scale.
 
I would respectfully disagree, as this flies negatively in the face if all the A&D fx120i users as well as the tuned beam scale guys including myself that can hold 2 inches of vertical at 1000 yards without an Analytical scale.
Oh I agree, just a little sarcastic humor!
 
The Dial O Grain scale is the same basic scale as the Dial O Gram scale that Ohaus sells to middle school science classrooms for $75 per. The beam heads are large, quite heavy and have a dampening system that is less than robust. The powder pan is also quite heavy. The dial operation relies on a coiled spring thus making it a hybrid of a mass balance and a spring scale and therefore more complicated than necessary.
The addition of the dial amounts to an additional poise on the beam head. This makes three sources of error versus two for any scale that I care to use for powder charges. For these reasons, I use other scales that are much better suited to the task.

Scott Parker
 
Although the 304 is a solid well made scale it's certainly not the most sensitive of reloading scales. When the 304 was available, say 1970-1990's it was quite an expensive scale compared with other common reloading scales but, back then, there was very little concern about single kernel accuracy. A tenth grain repeatability was good and a factory rifle that could shoot 1moa was also good - Now we just expect more.
Here's a couple of my beam scales - The original "Dial-o-grain" 1930 style and a Stanton AD4 from 1950's.


 
Although the 304 is a solid well made scale it's certainly not the most sensitive of reloading scales. When the 304 was available, say 1970-1990's it was quite an expensive scale compared with other common reloading scales but, back then, there was very little concern about single kernel accuracy. A tenth grain repeatability was good and a factory rifle that could shoot 1moa was also good - Now we just expect more.
Here's a couple of my beam scales - The original "Dial-o-grain" 1930 style and a Stanton AD4 from 1950's.


Somehow, I knew you would have a Stanton. I have a couple of Ainsworth and a Christian Becker.
 
My Ainsworth picks up the mass of a pencil line on a small piece of graph paper.
No doubt about it Ainsworth was a craftsman of the highest order, and mostly self taught.
All these beautiful machines are so undervalued. For the chain dial balance in the above post I recently paid just $35 They make the ordinary reloading scale look crude by comparison..
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,834
Messages
2,204,458
Members
79,157
Latest member
Bud1029
Back
Top