• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

No love for Ruger?

When the Number One came out, most everyone was pretty enthusiastic about it. I certainly was. The workmanship on those early Ones was damn good. The same was true of the early 77's. Those who had Number Ones were anxiously awaiting the new bolt action.
As I said, the quality was damn good. Checkering was excellent. The stock shape was nearly perfect. The bolt handle was weird! The angled guard screw was novel and it seemed, to me, to work pretty well.
Like all manufacturers, Ruger made changes, over the years. As with all manufacturers, these change were seldom made with the intent of improving quality and always made to improve the bottom line. In spite of this, Ruger has produced some pretty good stuff. I traded a Model 70, in 280 Rem, I had built, for a Ruger Number One and a Ruger 77 in 338RCM. There were things I hated about the 77 (short stock, poor checkering) but the darn thing shot well and functioned well. I reshaped the stock recheckered it then sold it to a short guy! The Number One was a donor rifle and is now one of my favored hunting rifles. WH
 
  • Like
Reactions: SSL
These two .22 sp101 revolvers I've had 20 and 30 years and shot countless bricks of ammo.They are among my favorite pistols.
As a bonus they are such bricks I can use them as hammers.the SP101 Isn't a light nimble pistol like a Smith .22 kit gun but I prefer them.

20220224_175434.jpg
 
Last edited:
Tricks in tuning Ruger tang and Mark II rifles are not well known.

A. Free float the magazine box-you want it loose between the floor plate and the action.

B. have that center screw only finger nail tight, or remove the screw entirely

Douglas replaced the barrels on a few of the Ruger Tang safety actions for me and they all would shoot 1/2" at 200 yards for hunting rifles. Douglas barrels in 22/250, 243 Win, 25/06, and 308 win. made the Tang Safety rifles shoot some very respectable groups. The Tang safety rifles had an adjustable trigger and I could massage mine down to 1-1.5 lbs for hunting.

I had a friend buy a Ruger Tang safety rifle in an odd ball caliber like 7x57. I met him at the range and the rifle was shooting horrible. I was watching him shoot from several benches away. He wanted to sell me me the rifle for cheap money during a rage. I asked him to let me tweek the rifle a little, and he said he did not care if I put the rifle in the burn barrel and set it on fire.

I took the rifle apart, removed the magazine box, and left the center screw on the table, then shot the rifle as a single shot. The rifle shot 3/4"-1 1/4" with Factory ammo, not bedded nor the barrel free floated. I saw this same issue in many of the Ruger Tang Safety rifles I purchased used for cheap money. If the barrel had any hint of a tight or loose spot with a tight fitting punch type jag, The rifle was mailed off to Douglas for a new barrel. 1/2" groups at 200 was our "normal" groups after load tweeking with those Douglas barrels. Way back then, every rifle got a 1/32 bullet jump from the lands(the talking heads had proclaimed that the 1/32" bullet jump to be magic.)
 
Last edited:
Rugers-- #! They shoot good after you seperate the forearm & nothing touching the barrel. The tang safety models are hit & miss on barrels. I scoped one of my better shooters & i didn't like what i saw. I am not going to. scope any more. New Blackhawks- I'm about 3 & 3 = in the 90's they were pretty cheap. I only had one 22, a SS single action. I didn't like it so i gave it to my sun=in-law. He likes it. I think Bill Ruger was one of the finest men in the gun industry. He gave us good guns at good prices- what more could you ask?
 
I've got a several, split mostly between No. 1's and M77's and have had nothing but good luck with them. Mostly 22 CF's but I've got a .243, .260 and a .280 and they're all 1 inch or less guns.
 
First Ruger was a bolt varmint .220 Swift bought back in 1975 used. Didnt have it long and was too inexperienced to be a judge on it. Bought a #1 in .22-250 new about 1983. Very pretty, wouldnt shoot to my satisfaction. Had two Mini 14's and 3 mini 30's. Wasn't looking for match accuracy but could not get any of them under 3" at 100 yards no matter what modification. I have two 10/22's that are custom except for the reciever. They shoot well. Other than that, Has a Ruger American sent back and was replaced. Junk. Sold it off after they replaced it with a new one without firing it. I like their short barreled single action revolvers. But, I am donre with Rugers.
 
Also have two Ruger .44 mag early Deerslayers. Just for nostalgia sake. Had multiple Old Single Six's. None any more.
 
In my experience, Ruger and precision shouldn't be used in the same sentence. I've seen the odd ones that really shoot, but they are scarce, and the aftermarket parts just aren't out there
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,278
Messages
2,215,993
Members
79,547
Latest member
M-Duke
Back
Top