No Cooper 4 ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Thread starter Hippy
- Start date
bobinpa
Gold $$ Contributor
I'll second that!!!!!! That is a real shame. The article said he was dazzled by his speech, more like baffled by his BS!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-10-27-prez-money_N.htm
MODERATOR:
The following is posted on the Cooper Firearms website. Seems like USAToday may not be telling the entire story:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-10-27-prez-money_N.htm
MODERATOR:
The following is posted on the Cooper Firearms website. Seems like USAToday may not be telling the entire story:
looks like he is shooting himself in the foot with his own gun. if he doesnt, barock insane obama will do it for him.
Sounds like they are taking the same path S & W did. Not a good business decision if you ask me, to alienate your customers.
SDH
SDH
Charliemac
Silver $$ Contributor
I think he needs the Zumbo treatment. This info should be widely disseminated. I think most riflemen would agree that Cooper ... doesn't deserve our money. Charlie Mac
Apparently mr. cooper doesn't mind paying for the "change" to socialism.......his lifestyle won't change.....he'll just pass on the taxation to his customers...........IF there's any left! I will definitely not be one now.
Once upon a time,early 1930's) there was this mesmerizing speechmaker, in Germany, I believe.....well you know the rest of the story.
Once upon a time,early 1930's) there was this mesmerizing speechmaker, in Germany, I believe.....well you know the rest of the story.
Obama, the most liberal, and least qualified candidate to ever make the US Presidential election finals, rates an 'F' grade from the NRA.
It amazes me that anybody can vote for this liberal tool, let alone a person who makes his living in the firearms industry.
Dan Cooper ... states he's concerned with how far right the Republicans have moved recently.
John F. Kennedy, may he rest in peace, would be WAY right of McCain. The liberal agenda has worked beautifully for them. Control the schools and the media, and you've created a couple of generations of morons. Basing their "thought" on emotions, i.e. they're not thinking at all.
Fight the good fight, friends. Liberalism really is a mental disorder. They believe they have the right to your productivity. It's immoral and disgraceful. Fight the intolerant left. The hateful left. The irresponsible left. The communist left. Turn off your television. It's a sewer pipe for the left.
It amazes me that anybody can vote for this liberal tool, let alone a person who makes his living in the firearms industry.
Dan Cooper ... states he's concerned with how far right the Republicans have moved recently.
John F. Kennedy, may he rest in peace, would be WAY right of McCain. The liberal agenda has worked beautifully for them. Control the schools and the media, and you've created a couple of generations of morons. Basing their "thought" on emotions, i.e. they're not thinking at all.
Fight the good fight, friends. Liberalism really is a mental disorder. They believe they have the right to your productivity. It's immoral and disgraceful. Fight the intolerant left. The hateful left. The irresponsible left. The communist left. Turn off your television. It's a sewer pipe for the left.
NATE is right on target! The mainstream media is without any doubt biased towards the left, and this is just the beginning.
Once they seize total power, the "fairness" doctrine they enact, WILL silence any that disagree with their policies.
This is not looking good, I believe we are are own worst enemy.
The claim that the GOP has moved too far right is laughable.
We live in a day where repeating a lie often enough renders it believable, and fact searching gets lost in the rhetoric.
Once they seize total power, the "fairness" doctrine they enact, WILL silence any that disagree with their policies.
This is not looking good, I believe we are are own worst enemy.
The claim that the GOP has moved too far right is laughable.
We live in a day where repeating a lie often enough renders it believable, and fact searching gets lost in the rhetoric.
Yep. Get the word out.
Looks like USA TOday has taken it down. I am "making a copy" under fair use, since Gannett is not being "fair".
More executives sold on Obama
By Ken Dilanian, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON — Dan Cooper, a proud member of the National Rifle Association, has backed Republicans for most of his life. He's the chief executive of Cooper Arms, a small Montana company that makes hunting rifles.
Cooper said he voted for George W. Bush in 2000, having voted in past elections for every Republican presidential nominee back to Richard Nixon. In October 1992, he presented a specially made rifle to the first President. Bush during a Billings campaign event.
This year, Cooper has given $3,300 to the campaign of Democrat Barack Obama. That's on top of the $1,000 check he wrote to Obama's U.S. Senate campaign in 2004, after he was dazzled by Obama's speech at that year's Democratic National Convention.
Cooper is a player in one of the little-told dramas of the 2008 presidential campaign: how Obama has been able to out-raise Republican John McCain among swaths of the business community, outperforming previous Democratic presidential nominees in drawing business support
Cooper changed sides, he said, "probably because of the war. And also because the Republican Party has moved so far right in recent years."
He also likes Obama's message about "the retooling of America, which involves the building of middle-class jobs and helping American small business be competitive with those overseas."
In 2000 and again in 2004, George W. Bush out-raised his Democratic rival among employees and executives of nearly every business sector, according to the non-partisan Center for Responsive Politics, which codes contributors by occupation.
In this election, however, Obama has bested McCain among employees and executives in finance, insurance and real estate; health; communications; law; and "miscellaneous business," according to the center's tally of contributions through August.
McCain has maintained the traditional Republican lead in transportation, construction, defense, energy and agribusiness.
In the miscellaneous business sector — which includes retail, service industries and many small enterprises — Bush out-raised Democrat John Kerry, $20.6 million to $14.8 million in 2004. Obama has taken in $20.5 million from that sector to McCain's $13.4 million, records show. Those numbers don't include September and October, when Obama was raising tens of millions but McCain's campaign was not taking private donations. McCain accepted $84 million in public financing while Obama opted out of the federal system.
Obama has taken in twice as much as McCain from employees of pharmaceutical and related companies, the center found. And Obama has raised $5.1 million from workers at computer and Internet companies, compared with McCain's $1.3 million.
Among Obama's contributors, 5,845 list "CEO" or "chief executive" in their title, compared with 2,597 of McCain's donors, according to election records compiled by CQ MoneyLine. In the 2003-04 cycle, 3,567 of Bush's donors were listed that way, compared with 1,686 for Kerry.
"I guess he can't accuse us of being the candidate of big business," McCain spokesman Brian Rogers said. He noted that some Democrats are raising money for McCain, and he criticized Obama for forgoing public financing.
Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt noted that unlike Obama, McCain accepts money from federal lobbyists.
"Our campaign has been funded by more than 3.1 million Americans who gave an average of $86," he said.
Mary Kay Cashman runs a Caterpillar franchise in Nevada. She has given $68,600 to Republican candidates over the years, including $2,000 to Bush in 2003. This year, she changed her registration to Democrat to caucus for Obama in the Nevada primary.
"There's an abundant amount of evidence that the status quo isn't working and the direction needs to be changed," she said. Asked why she didn't support Democrat Al Gore in 2000 or Kerry in 2004, she said, "There are personality traits that are required in a leader, and neither Gore nor Kerry had those."
Bill Struve runs a small business in Wilmington, N.C., that develops metal clay, which is used in making jewelry. He said the only time he hasn't backed a Republican for president is when he cast a vote for independent Ross Perot in 1992. He has given Obama $2,300 this year. "The Republicans have … lost their footing on economics," he said.
Bob Clark of Missouri and Victor Hammel of Pennsylvania are CEOs of large businesses who tend to back Democrats but also donate to Republicans. Clark runs Clayco, a St. Louis real estate development firm. Hammel leads J.C. Ehrlich, a pest-control company based in Reading, Pa..
They are the types McCain had hoped to attract. Instead, Clark, who raised thousands for Bush in 2000, has raised more than $500,000 for Obama. And Hammel, who regularly gives money to Republican Sen. Arlen Specter, has donated $2,300 to Obama.
"Barack is definitely more liberal than I am," Clark said. "But I'm willing to compromise on some of those issues for what I think is the greater good."
Hammel said, "I would rather pay a little higher tax on a higher profit than a lower tax rate on lower profits."
Looks like USA TOday has taken it down. I am "making a copy" under fair use, since Gannett is not being "fair".
More executives sold on Obama
By Ken Dilanian, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON — Dan Cooper, a proud member of the National Rifle Association, has backed Republicans for most of his life. He's the chief executive of Cooper Arms, a small Montana company that makes hunting rifles.
Cooper said he voted for George W. Bush in 2000, having voted in past elections for every Republican presidential nominee back to Richard Nixon. In October 1992, he presented a specially made rifle to the first President. Bush during a Billings campaign event.
This year, Cooper has given $3,300 to the campaign of Democrat Barack Obama. That's on top of the $1,000 check he wrote to Obama's U.S. Senate campaign in 2004, after he was dazzled by Obama's speech at that year's Democratic National Convention.
Cooper is a player in one of the little-told dramas of the 2008 presidential campaign: how Obama has been able to out-raise Republican John McCain among swaths of the business community, outperforming previous Democratic presidential nominees in drawing business support
Cooper changed sides, he said, "probably because of the war. And also because the Republican Party has moved so far right in recent years."
He also likes Obama's message about "the retooling of America, which involves the building of middle-class jobs and helping American small business be competitive with those overseas."
In 2000 and again in 2004, George W. Bush out-raised his Democratic rival among employees and executives of nearly every business sector, according to the non-partisan Center for Responsive Politics, which codes contributors by occupation.
In this election, however, Obama has bested McCain among employees and executives in finance, insurance and real estate; health; communications; law; and "miscellaneous business," according to the center's tally of contributions through August.
McCain has maintained the traditional Republican lead in transportation, construction, defense, energy and agribusiness.
In the miscellaneous business sector — which includes retail, service industries and many small enterprises — Bush out-raised Democrat John Kerry, $20.6 million to $14.8 million in 2004. Obama has taken in $20.5 million from that sector to McCain's $13.4 million, records show. Those numbers don't include September and October, when Obama was raising tens of millions but McCain's campaign was not taking private donations. McCain accepted $84 million in public financing while Obama opted out of the federal system.
Obama has taken in twice as much as McCain from employees of pharmaceutical and related companies, the center found. And Obama has raised $5.1 million from workers at computer and Internet companies, compared with McCain's $1.3 million.
Among Obama's contributors, 5,845 list "CEO" or "chief executive" in their title, compared with 2,597 of McCain's donors, according to election records compiled by CQ MoneyLine. In the 2003-04 cycle, 3,567 of Bush's donors were listed that way, compared with 1,686 for Kerry.
"I guess he can't accuse us of being the candidate of big business," McCain spokesman Brian Rogers said. He noted that some Democrats are raising money for McCain, and he criticized Obama for forgoing public financing.
Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt noted that unlike Obama, McCain accepts money from federal lobbyists.
"Our campaign has been funded by more than 3.1 million Americans who gave an average of $86," he said.
Mary Kay Cashman runs a Caterpillar franchise in Nevada. She has given $68,600 to Republican candidates over the years, including $2,000 to Bush in 2003. This year, she changed her registration to Democrat to caucus for Obama in the Nevada primary.
"There's an abundant amount of evidence that the status quo isn't working and the direction needs to be changed," she said. Asked why she didn't support Democrat Al Gore in 2000 or Kerry in 2004, she said, "There are personality traits that are required in a leader, and neither Gore nor Kerry had those."
Bill Struve runs a small business in Wilmington, N.C., that develops metal clay, which is used in making jewelry. He said the only time he hasn't backed a Republican for president is when he cast a vote for independent Ross Perot in 1992. He has given Obama $2,300 this year. "The Republicans have … lost their footing on economics," he said.
Bob Clark of Missouri and Victor Hammel of Pennsylvania are CEOs of large businesses who tend to back Democrats but also donate to Republicans. Clark runs Clayco, a St. Louis real estate development firm. Hammel leads J.C. Ehrlich, a pest-control company based in Reading, Pa..
They are the types McCain had hoped to attract. Instead, Clark, who raised thousands for Bush in 2000, has raised more than $500,000 for Obama. And Hammel, who regularly gives money to Republican Sen. Arlen Specter, has donated $2,300 to Obama.
"Barack is definitely more liberal than I am," Clark said. "But I'm willing to compromise on some of those issues for what I think is the greater good."
Hammel said, "I would rather pay a little higher tax on a higher profit than a lower tax rate on lower profits."
OK, I'm just checking to make sure this got posted. I'm going to every gun board that I can to make sure people see this.
Here's a copy of the email that I sent to info,at)cooperfirearms.com
Mr. Cooper,
I read in disbelief of your support for Barak Obama in USA Today and was completely disgusted by it. Giving your support to a Senator with an "F" rating from the NRA who has worked his entire political life trying to gut the Second Amendment compels me to write this email.
Be assured that Cooper Firearms will never get a dime from me and that I will work on convincing anyone that I can, to not to do business with your company also.
I'm sure that Smith & Wesson and Jim Zumbo both remember when they turned their backs on firearms owners.
Frank XXXXXXX
Here's a copy of the email that I sent to info,at)cooperfirearms.com
Mr. Cooper,
I read in disbelief of your support for Barak Obama in USA Today and was completely disgusted by it. Giving your support to a Senator with an "F" rating from the NRA who has worked his entire political life trying to gut the Second Amendment compels me to write this email.
Be assured that Cooper Firearms will never get a dime from me and that I will work on convincing anyone that I can, to not to do business with your company also.
I'm sure that Smith & Wesson and Jim Zumbo both remember when they turned their backs on firearms owners.
Frank XXXXXXX
Cooper Arms have printed a retraction to the USA Today article on thier website for anyone interested.
They claim Dan Cooper contributed to the Obama campaign in an attempt to defeat Hillary.
They also claim to have donated three times the money to McCain.
Still doesn't make sense to me. The USA Today article was pretty implicit about Dans support for Obama. We can always trust the media to tell the truth.
I think its simply damage control.
Now if anyone tells me Savage donated to Obama I'll simply puke.
They claim Dan Cooper contributed to the Obama campaign in an attempt to defeat Hillary.
They also claim to have donated three times the money to McCain.
Still doesn't make sense to me. The USA Today article was pretty implicit about Dans support for Obama. We can always trust the media to tell the truth.
I think its simply damage control.
Now if anyone tells me Savage donated to Obama I'll simply puke.
Upgrades & Donations
This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.
Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.
You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.
To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.
Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.
You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.
To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.