I’m kinda wondering if the fact that a hornady case has right about 55 gr h20 and Peterson is 50
should one consider a max book load -5 grains as max published data? Because if that’s the case I’m far over max with where I started my work up.
I took my old load that shot well, reduced by 1% and worked up in .2 incriminates, if all is equal then I should had started even lower..
I know I need to speed check it..
A few years ago I was working a 338 Win Mag with 225 grain Hornadys. The manual said 2900 fps was the max velocity with the max load. I achieved 2900 fps with the min load. No pressure signs. I stopped load development, took apart the remaining rounds, and started with a lower powder charge with my testing.
I consider the max published velocity in the bullet maker manual for a given powder and bullet, corrected for barrel length, to be a good guide to what the max velocity can be without exceeding SAAMI pressures. This is probably plus or minus 50 fps.
So at whatever powder charge I reach the max published velocity, assuming no other pressure signs, I consider to be the max charge.
Realize the first pressure sign, often a primer starting to flatten, usually doesn't show up until past 65,000 PSI. I know one fellow, a ballistics consultant for the US Army, saw as much as 80,000 PSI with no pressure signs on one lot of brass as measured by his Oehler 43 PBL strain gauge.
So anyway, I think a chronograph is one of the best tools available to help determine max loads. There is no ballistic free lunch. If we are getting 100 fps over what the manual shows, we are likely well over pressure, regardless of how much below max our powder charge might be.
So get/borrow a chronograph and your questions will be answered.