drop_point
Silver $$ Contributor
I would imagine the mechanics are more similar than different between an Arken and a Vortex that is in a similar price range.You also have to remember that the Arken price point is a lot lower than many of the optics everyone compares them against, ie; Vortex razor, NightForce, etc. So if they are even somewhat close in performance, that’s pretty impressive.
I think it’s fair to say the Arken optical quality is ‘on par’ with scopes in the $500-$1000 range, perhaps even better than some, but I would trust the “mechanical” reliability of an Arken over anything Vortex produces. If you took a Vortex Venom and put it thru some of the turret torture testing like many have with the Arken, I wouldn’t bet a single penny that the Vortex would hold up like the Arken does. That’s a lot more important trait for a scope to have. So if optical quality is similar, then the going with the Arken is the clear choice.
If you have owned a lot of Vortex products and haven’t had a mechanical failure on turrets or side focus yet, then you probably aren’t using them very hard at all
I have seen these guys that tout "Japanese glass, better than a Razor!".
For $400, maybe I'll try one for myself and if it doesn't work, some sucker will buy it off me.