Grimstod
Machinist, Designer, and Shooter.
I do not remember the numbers but he did say that it was so significant that it made it useless for ballistic calculations.How much error did he find in dopler? I assume this also effects the labradar.
I do not remember the numbers but he did say that it was so significant that it made it useless for ballistic calculations.How much error did he find in dopler? I assume this also effects the labradar.
Matrix 150 & 160 are quite viable. KevinIt'll be nice to have more heavy options in the 6.5... right now the eldms are the only readily available bullet pushing that 150 area
You guys keep mentioning these but a google search yields nothing.Matrix 150 & 160 are quite viable. Kevin
Didn't hornady just put some money into a Doppler system to make sure their bc's were accurate...in my limited experience everything seems to jive when punched into a ballistics calculator
Think that may be the 308 bullet your talking about. Yes Sierra did make a 155 mk but years ago. Discontinued now and yes it wasn't built like the 142smk. I would think if Sierra built one today, it would be superior to the 142. Especially with there TMK design out.Not sure if anyone mentioned it, but Sierra has a 155gr bullet out for the past 20years. It's bc is less than their 142 but you could use its specs in Quickload to get some idea on pressures generated and velocities.
Think that may be the 308 bullet your talking about. Yes Sierra did make a 155 mk but years ago. Discontinued now and yes it wasn't built like the 142smk. I would think if Sierra built one today, it would be superior to the 142. Especially with there TMK design out.
Looking at the picture this bullet has the same amount of bearing surface as the 140s. Just a longer noes. So longer throat, maybe just not that much. I am thinking .185 of freebore vs my usual .175. With the 140 .175 still has a lot of bullet in the case.
Agreed, Dave Kiff tells me he thinks a .200 freebore is best for the 140 Hybrids, so with this bullet having an almost identical amount of bearing surface should be easy to build a 6.5x47 that can shoot both. We shall see where it likes to jump from. H4350 will be a must or something in the burn range.
Think about this too. Most fellas running 140 use varget and get 2750 and if you can switch to a bullet that has a much higher BC and produces the same muzzle velocity with 41-42gr of H4350 that is a win win. I am excited now and no longer skeptical.
QL shows .264, 155, Sierra HPBT LR MatchK 9570, apparently Sierra does not make it anymore.Think that may be the 308 bullet your talking about. Yes Sierra did make a 155 mk but years ago. Discontinued now and yes it wasn't built like the 142smk. I would think if Sierra built one today, it would be superior to the 142. Especially with there TMK design out.
Use a drop tibe. I have a short freebore (.167) and can get in 42 before i hit compressionThe problem I've run into using over 41gr H4350 is compressed loads. I do not like compressed loads. So, I run Viht N550. I will say that H4350 has shot well for me in spite of compression.
Think about this too. Most fellas running 140 use varget and get 2750 and if you can switch to a bullet that has a much higher BC and produces the same muzzle velocity with 41-42gr of H4350 that is a win win. I am excited now and no longer skeptical.
Do you season your brass before starting load development?If I were you, I'd remain skeptical about the associated pressure penalty likely to be encountered.
There's no "free lunch" in Physics...