• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

NBRSA & IBS

NBRSA & IBS
Two kissing cousins. Both have a piece the of action in USA benchrest. Both the IBS & NBRSA have members on the World Teams that compete for Team USA. Both talk the crap depends on which Range you shoot on in a particular day.
Let's go back when there was neither. I have to admit I have some very good sources so be careful how you respond. Benchrest has always had a following. It is the standard way of testing rifle, ammunition, and shooter for the ultimate accuracy that Page and Newick wrote about.
NBRSA
Early benchrest had 3 distinct areas prior to 1949. The Northwest the East and the Gulf Coast.
The Northwest mainly Washington State had the Puget Sound Sniper Congress that started competitions in 1944. The East had Harvey Donaldsen and the EBRSA shooting at Pine Tree in 1947 and other East Clubs. Texas had the San Angelo Cup not sure when they started. Point is the desire came about in 1949 for a National benchrest organization to compare all the great shooting that was being done. The first National meeting was in Denver in 1949. Here it was agreed to return in 1950 to record the beginning of the NBRSA. Postal National matches were fired in 1950 and World Records were recorded. Th first Rule Book was approved. Regions were established 6 to start with. The 6 were NW, MC, SW, NC, Eastern, GC. Schedules were approved.
In 1955 Group Nationals replaced the Postal Nats. Custer, S Dakota held the 1st shoulder to shoulder Nats. Walt Berger in his first year of BR went with George Kelbly to watch the competition. Good turnout.
One thing must be said here from 1950 to 1957 there was only one class,Unlimited Class almost all 10 shot events. In 1957 HV came on the scene. HV started as a 13# 12X scope gun. Also by 1960 there was still one benchrest organization, the NBRSA. The NBRSA was doing well. The SP & LV bag guns along with the HV came on in the early 1960's, what a hoot. The LV & Sporter were based on HV rules except were 10 1/2# guns and Sporter started with a 6X scope. When scope limitations were taken off the 10 1/2# & 13 1/2# guns became imbedded in what we know today. Hunter started I think in 1971 as a precision score game. In Hunter 6X scopes were the limit as they are today. Extremely tough competition. A man's game.
1969
The NE crowd formerly the EBRSA never warmed up to the NBRSA idea of National benchrest and at a meeting of the Eastern Region in 1969 voted themselves out the NBRSA taking the treasury and a list of Clubs that supported them. I have all kinds of names but not necessary.
In 1970 the IBS was formed. By-laws were written closely paralleling the NBRSA. Why not they had 20 years to learn from the NBRSA. The Eastern Region of the NBRSA eventually returned some of the prodigal clubs to their nest. The IBS looked in other countries for allies. As years went by the two organizations held their ground but BR shooters for the most part will go to where the best shoots are. NBRSA shooters crossed over even holding both cards and IBS shooters grudgingly lowered their guard not as easily but adopted the trust but verify mode.
Gunsmiths & Equipment
Here is where no organization can capture the others flock. BR shooters thrive on improving their equipment. Nobody that I know asks a gunsmith what their BR politics are. Smiths being a feisty bunch might seperate you from your hair if such a conversation went South quickly. Hart barrels, out of an IBS family business, are seen all over NBRSA country. Shilen made products in New York and Texas. I challenge anybody to identify which political BR Company made their equipment. Probably most manufacturer's would say they belong to both.
The Super Shoot coming up, the greatest shoot in the BR World, has plenty of NBRSA & IBS shooters as it should. I have many friends in both Organizations. I belong to both the NBRSA & IBS. San Gabriel BR Range, where I am Shoot Director to both NBRSA/IBS Shoots operates well in either discipline, has half of the Shoots for each. That's the way it will stay.
Future of Benchrest
The future looks good. Nice to have more younger shooters. The item that concerns me is the selfish nature of some that feel there is a leak in the dam but only want to make things worst. Regional meetings as the one's held recently in the Gulf Coast & SE Regions scare me because they take agenda items to the BOD meetings and then proceed to try and barter away our rights. The original NBRSA rule book of 1951 was 6 pages. It still works as the majority of what the 6 pages contained are still in the current book. One item I am most concerned with is the continual attempt to remove Sporter from the Rule Book. Knowing they can't remove Sporter they want to modify it out of existence. Well cow pucky on them. Not on my watch. Read my Post on this Competition Section about Sporter Class. Maybe somebody could do the LR history of both organizations also.

Well that's enough before I really get going on this. Remember I have 80+ documents on the beginnings of BR so be careful. Constructive dialogue accepted. Let it be said Let it be done.
Stephen Perry
 
StephenPerry said:
Chuck
Nice to be on a Forum that I don't to fight 3 legged venomous dogs and hyeenas.
Stephen

Stephen

Easy there big fella.;)

Great job. It's a shame there isn't a comprehensive history of modern Benchrest,1944 - 2006). Many of todays shooters weren't even born when it all started and they have no idea of how we got to where we are today.

A couple of years ago I wrote a little article for a cartridge collector journal that went into some of the history of the organizations but concentrated more on the cartridges themselves. It was well received by the collectors since most of them knew that Benchrest had an impact on cartridge development but most were not aware of the extent of it.

Anyway Stephen, here are a couple of comments I have. No way intended to criticize.

The original Benchrest organization in the Pacific Northwest was called the Puget Sound Snipers Congress. The travelling trophy, SNIPER KING, is the longest continuously contested Benchrest match and is awarded each year to the shooter posting the smallest 10-shot group at 200 yards fired at a couple of pre-selected tournaments.

Eastern shooters also started shooting informal matches in the same year that the Snipers Congress was formed,1944). I believe their first formal tournament was held in Johnstown NY in 1947.,Maybe that's the same as Pine Tree???)

Hunter Benchrest,HBR) actually started in California in the early 1960s and was not affiliated with NBRSA. It was not intended as a "precision score" game but was actually a bunch of guys shooting their hunting rifles,243, 244, 308) against one another. When NBRSA finally accepted HBR as a part of it's program they simply adopted the rules and equipment that were in use by the California guys. As it turned out, this was sorta contrary to the basic premise of Benchrest which is the development of extreme accuracy in rifles and ammunition. HBR kinda languished for a while until the rules were relaxed to allow more custom Benchrest type rifles, and it has grown steadily since.

Enough from me. Good job and keep it up.:thumb:

Ray
 
Ray
There might have been a Calif group shooting hunting rifles in the 1960's but Hunter class in the NBRSA started and still is a score class. I believe it started in 1971.
Don't be so quick to say BR started in the same year on both coasts. Some do that. The EBRSA only claims Pine as their 1st Shoot in 1947. We are both kinda close.
Stephen Perry
 
Stephen

This shows to go you that we really need a comprehensive history written before all of us old-timers are gone and the real story is lost to history.

My understanding is that the Richmond Rod & Gun Club was shooting score matches in the early 1960s with rules and targets very much like those adopted by NBRSA in 1965 on a trial basis. Vernon and Ray Speer actively supported and encouraged it's adoption by NBRSA.

It's also my understanding that the first targets were just one bull since the groups were big enough to score as is. It was only later when the rifles and shooters became good enough to require one bull for each shot.

BTW, I've tried to find one of those original targets, with no luck. There was also another target where the scoring rings were a different size than todays, but all of them are lost also.

Yeah, I've heard that arguement about who started first a million times. It still riles up some of the old Pacific NW shooters.

Ray
 
Ray
One thing about 1950 & 1960's BR there were a lot of letters written between shooters and management. I can help you with some of these. Richmond was unique in Calif BR. Never shot there but been there. Harvey Miller my smith way back when took me there. Stu Harvey is probably our best source for Calif BR. He says he goes back to 1959. SW Region was one of the original regions starting 1950 so there must be some records of BR shooting in Calif or Arizona. I was born in 1950. Wasn't an eye witness back then.
Stephen Perry
 
Interesting read. I am in disagreement with your premise that IBS & NBRSA are kissing cousins.
IBS is a democratically operated organization and NBRSA is a bunch of good old boys who like the status quo.
Your concern is the Sporter class, I could care less cause I am a confirmed score shooter.
The NBRSA has restricted score shooting to Hunter Class
,my first love) and has refused to approve Varmint for Score in any way shape or form. Every time it has been brought up at a Board of Directors meeting, the very thought has been squashed. I bet the membership would resoundingly approve this expantion of Score in NBRSA.
The NBRSA even instituted regulations that restrict where Nationals can be held which pretty much eliminates most of the clubs in the North West from hold National Championships. This is a slap in the face for a club like LaGrande, Or. This club has held 2 Hunter Class Nationals in the past 7 years and done themselves proud.
Between the NBRSA's last slap and just plan ignoring the wishes of score shooters in general, the LaGrande club is now hosting IBS matches. Even VFS shooters have a venue at which to compete. Why, someday they may even have a Sporter match, what ever that is.
I am not unsympathetic to your concerns Stephen, but I am overjoyed with the new opportunities that have arisen at my home club. I believe that NBRSA would just as soon see Score shooting banned from the face of BR. If they ever got it done I guess a lot of us Score Shooters would just find some other adventure.

Happy Trails
Ron Baldner
Boise, Idaho
 
Ron
I talked about Sporter because it is common to both Organizations. I didn't talk about VFS because it is an IBS Sport. NBRSA wants no part of VFS. Most NBRSA Clubs would not schedule it. With the exception of Hunter and I'm not sure about 600 & 1000 yd the NBRSA is a group shooting bunch and hopefully that will not change. I schedule 5 IBS Group Shoots a year along with 6 NBRSA Shoots.
Can't handle group shooting shoot Score. Besides my target frames are for group targets not the oversize VFS targets.
Stephen Perry
 
Ron

Unfortunately, what you said is true. I used to attend as many Regional and/or National meetings as my time would permit but I became more skeptical at each one. I would write comments and suggestions and speak directly to the Regional Director on matters that needed to be hashed out without going public. I now do none of the above. As you know I now shoot very little Varmint and devote most of my time to Long Range. The reason being that there is very little involvement in LR by the Board. However, that can sometimes be a two-edged sword because there are LR issues that need to addressed but I would rather live with what we have than start mucking up a discipline that, for the most part, simply lets shooters compete and experiment to their heart's content. I know that the NW Region has become more and more alienated from the heiarchy of NBRSA particularly over the Score and Long Range disciplines. I completely agree with how they,NW Region Clubs) have decided to address their concerns although I wish there had been another way.

To be fair, I have the greatest regard for the current and past SW Region Directors. Because of that, I still support the Representative organization of NBRSA over the Democratic IBS.

But I have to admit that I now have an old man's attitude - let the youngsters work it out. They will have to live with their decisions, not me. The same for politics.:rolleyes:

Keep em all in one hole! No, wait. Keep em all in the X-Ring.;)

Ray
 
I don't shoot hunter or vfs but what it seems to me is ranges that have group shoots don't have score and those who have score shoots don't have group. Anyway, I don't see why the NBRSA is against vfs at these score shooting ranges as it seems to make no difference to the group side of things, it's not as if they are both going to be shot at the same time.
 
My post regarding this subject is not here. Must have been too controversial. I am out of here for a week so will check back when I get back

Happy Trails
Ron Baldner
 
Ron
This is a different kind of forum from BRC. Mostly readers. Nothing wrong with that but no need for pyro-technics here. There is enough here to spread everybody out. I picked the Competition area because that is what I do. I think the editor keeps an eye on everything that comes in. My time on BRC became volatile ay times. This needn't happen here.
Stephen Perry
 
roninboise said:
My post regarding this subject is not here. Must have been too controversial. I am out of here for a week so will check back when I get back

Happy Trails
Ron Baldner

Ron,

Nothing was edited. Perhaps you had posted in another subforum.
 
Just got home from a week on an adventure. I see that Steve and Cheechako both read my original post but it is still no where to be found. How can that be/

Ron Baldner
 
NBRSA/IBS
I consider this an open ended thread and I will continue to add to it as I gather more info, this I have done. A good re-read.
Stephen Perry
 
Ron Baldner
Ron we never finished with your comments in NBRSA & IBS. Please continue. Since you are by trade a Hunter Shooter you are aware that VFS is a luke warm version of what you do. To be honest VFS saved the the IBS. Not bad. The NBRSA doesn't need such saving. Like I said I belong to both and run Shoots for both.
The NW is a perfect place for the IBS since there has been a good tradition of Hunter ranges. Run both NBRSA & IBS I did it at San Gabriel. Seems to be some strife and cornfusion up there. VFS will never be part of the NBRSA. Don't need it don't want it. Group shooting is where it's at.
Stephen Perry
 
StephenPerry said:
VFS will never be part of the NBRSA.

Stephen

We are both old enough to know better than to say "never". Everything changes over time, nothing stays the same. It's my opinion that NBRSA group shooting needs an influx of new ideas, now, because changes are so slow to take place that you suddenly wake up one morning and find that it's all gone and you're left wondering what happened. How many times have we sat around at an NBRSA group tournament lamenting the loss of the old-timers but never considering where the young shooters to replace them will come from. I shot my first competition in 1954,pistol) and have shot in just about every shooting discipline conceived since then. Many of them are now gone but when I was involved in them I could not have imagined that the day would come when they would be no more. Believe me, the day will come when a new generation of shooters will no longer have an interest in spending their fortune on equipment designed to make one tiny group after another, after another, groups so small that it will take more sophisticated measuring equipment than we now have just to see who won. I'm not sure it's our,old guys) responsibility to start the changes and personally I have no interest in doing so,I don't think you do either) but it will happen whether we take to it peacefully or have to be drug kicking and screaming into it. JMHO

Ray
 
Ray
What you say about change could be true. But if it happens outside group shooting it will have to be another Organization. I'm sure Score approached the NBRSA several times about adding the discipline but got the same answer. People that seek to have Score need to start their own Organization not ask the NBRSA to split theirs. Score shooters seem generally unhappy. These are not my exclusive opinions.
Stephen Perry
 
StephenPerry said:
Ray
What you say about change could be true. But if it happens outside group shooting it will have to be another Organization. I'm sure Score approached the NBRSA several times about adding the discipline but got the same answer. People that seek to have Score need to start their own Organization not ask the NBRSA to split theirs. Score shooters seem generally unhappy. These are not my exclusive opinions.
Stephen Perry

Stephen

I guess I should have been more blunt. If NBRSA Group does not respond to the need for change it WILL happen outside the organization and NBRSA Group will eventually die from old age.

Ray
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,788
Messages
2,203,189
Members
79,110
Latest member
miles813
Back
Top