• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Naval gun rifling cutter photo's

Consider the analogous problems associated with precision turning and trepanning (hollowing) of the gigantic forged propulsion driveshafts in aircraft carriers. (The long trepanning lathe bed in the aerial photo. The cutting head advances 45 in/hr. Puget Sound Naval Shipyard 1958)
20200110_111715.jpg
20200110_112623.jpg
20200110_115603.jpg


-
 
Last edited:
I think only a relatively narrow brass drive band incorporated into the body takes much engraving.
The article I linked to (previously) refers to copper driving bands, and copper fouling. It also mentions gain twist, but also tapered (ever widening) lands to maintain gas seal to the muzzle.
-
 
Last edited:
The way I understand it is the steel casing rides the lands. The band is there to engrave in the grooves and rotate the shell.

Added: so the band doesn't really support the weight of the shell. It's just there to turn it.
And for a gas seal, probably just as important as twist. The lands widen toward the muzzle to maintain gas seal.
-
 
Dusty, it would seem so, but in truth, it does not. The ship weighs over 50,000 tons, the guns have a recoil system that absorbs the vast majority of the energy.
In theory, since there is always a reaction to an action, it possibly moves a non measurable amount.

Good read, can't believe the weight of those projectiles and what velocity. (16" Creedmores)
 
Dusty, it would seem so, but in truth, it does not. The ship weighs over 50,000 tons, the guns have a recoil system that absorbs the vast majority of the energy.
In theory, since there is always a reaction to an action, it possibly moves a non measurable amount.

Reading the insert, I read that the battleship Missouri moves 6" sideways on a full broadside. That is a LOT of water moving sideways on the backside which in turn is going to create one hell of a trailing wake on the front side of the broadside. Somebody talks about ice. Ice is assuming the surface is frictionless. In a frictionless situation, the ship won't stop moving sideways. That is until something stops it. Water stops the ship.

The opinion created in the insert, and I'm not saying you are wrong jackieschmidt, say's to me that more mathematicians need to go out and get some REAL WORLD EXPERIENCE. I have seen dozens of pictures of Battleships doing a broadside to see a short trailing wake on the broadside. And most anyone who's been in a boat knows the difference between a wake and surface disturbance that the blast would create.

Again, think about 6" of water on the backside being moved by a 50,000 ton, 887'long, 30' deep surface. According to Bernouli, that would make a wave and leave a wake.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
164,672
Messages
2,182,516
Members
78,476
Latest member
375hhfan
Back
Top