Went out today to shoot. 30 degrees, overcast, high humidity, light wind at 12'oclock right into my face. Cold, but no mirage.
Set the target at 350yards and shot the 88ELD (30.5gns RL17), the 95 SMK (30.5gns RL17), the 85.5 (32gns RL-17), and the 80 ELD (32gns RL-17) all side by side. Tested a couple different seating depths with the 95, 85.5, and 80s and saw pretty poor results across the board.

I accidentally shot my frame, which is made of rebar and it trashed it. This target will need to be rebuilt.
If we were to assign the above target numbers: rows are 1,2,3,4 and the columns are A, B, C, D, and E then here is the breakdown:
1A: 95SMK, 2.7"
1B: 95SMK, 2"
1C: 6 shots, 88ELD, 2"
1D: 80 ELD, unmeasurable
2A: 85.5, 3.8"
2B: 85.5, 2.8"
2C: 85.5, 3.1"
3A: 80ELD, 1.6"
All other targets are my 20VT (
http://forum.accurateshooter.com/threads/my-20-vartarg-custom.3969176/)
Best group was shot with the 80ELD at 0.010" out of the lands or so (3A above):

The group is the 2 pairs of shots and one low and measured 1.6". The other 5 are from my vartarg that blew over to the edge of the target.
Feeling a little miffed. I mean, I went through the winter for 6 months without shooting, so some of this may be rusty skills, but I'm also concerned that something has changed with the gun. The 88s can shoot much smaller than they did today and the 20 Vartarg, which should be at a large disadvantage to the 22BR was shooting smaller.
I think I may be pushing the 85.5 too hard, even at the reduced 3200fps. I'll try running them down to 3100 or so and give that a try. On the bright side, every bullet made it to the target today!
Oh well. Scrub it down real good and load up some more for next weekend...
EDIT: I think I am at 450rnds down the tube now.