The couch isn’t that bad . At least you know where you’ll be and what to expect. Kinda like it there myself… A lot quieter…I feel like I opened a pandoras box. Of course, every time I go to checkout at one of our vendors, I swear this should be all I finally need. Uh huh......cheaper than a booby bar I guess. And my bride is less apt to make me sleep on the couch.
Funny, when I was younger I would get pissed over the couch. Now I don't give a rip, except I can't walk the next day. I think I will stay in graces with her.The couch isn’t that bad . At least you know where you’ll be and what to expect. Kinda like it there myself… A lot quieter…
The problem is if the body of the case also has a thicker side the case can warp when fired. Also, the base of the case can be tilted due to uneven expansion on the thinner side.the picture on the right is common...even with the best of brass...wouldnt a pressure ring form at the weakest point first? The thin side...sure seems to me it would. I will stay with my ball mics...multiplying by 2 and adding the bullet diameter isnt that difficult.
Why have you decided to start turning your case necks? Do you have a tight neck chamber? What caliber are you working with?So... as I jump down this rabbit hole of turning necks, a question arises. Is it important to actually know the neck thickness of our brass, or know what the variance is we see when measuring different points around the neck? What brings this thought to mind, can we establish variation with conventional micrometer or does it have to be a ball micrometer? My knee jerk reaction is as long as we can establish variation, we can obtain out goal. Obviously the accuracy obtained with a regular micrometer is at play here, but is it any easier or more difficult than with a ball micrometer?
Any help is appreciated.
Well....I have been seeing just enough fluctuation in velocity to make me wonder if this might help a little. And no, I'm not running a tight neck chamber.Why have you decided to start turning your case necks? Do you have a tight neck chamber? What caliber are you working with?
Get a recliner. You can thank yourself later.Funny, when I was younger I would get pissed over the couch. Now I don't give a rip, except I can't walk the next day. I think I will stay in graces with her.
Variation in neck wall thickness may effect accuracy but not extreme spread. Neck tension, among other things, can effect velocity. If you are shooting a standard SAAMI chamber and you are doing anything other than cutting off the high spots to uniform thickness the best you can you will be creating other problems. Try buying some better brass depending on what caliber you are working with.Well....I have been seeing just enough fluctuation in velocity to make me wonder if this might help a little. And no, I'm not running a tight neck chamber.
It was my intention to only skim the necks for starters. This is Lapua brass.Variation in neck wall thickness may effect accuracy but not extreme spread. Neck tension, among other things, can effect velocity. If you are shooting a standard SAAMI chamber and you are doing anything other than cutting off the high spots to uniform thickness the best you can you will be creating other problems. Try buying some better brass depending on what caliber you are working with.
I'm gonna play with this also. What i plan on doing is finding the thinnest neck in the bunch and set the cutter at that, then proceed.It was my intention to only skim the necks for starters. This is Lapua brass.
.
A BALL END MICROMETER is the best way to go here.So... as I jump down this rabbit hole of turning necks, a question arises. Is it important to actually know the neck thickness of our brass, or know what the variance is we see when measuring different points around the neck? What brings this thought to mind, can we establish variation with conventional micrometer or does it have to be a ball micrometer? My knee jerk reaction is as long as we can establish variation, we can obtain out goal. Obviously the accuracy obtained with a regular micrometer is at play here, but is it any easier or more difficult than with a ball micrometer?
Any help is appreciated.
